asd-ste100
Skill14 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English — one meaning per word, active voice, simple tenses, short sentences, small noun clusters. The visual-explainer and visual-plan skills require it for every human-readable string they produce. Also use it whenever the user asks for Simplified Technical English, or for plain, unambiguous prose.
32 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- hamzzaqureshi/gravidextheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nateslabach/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- smartwatermelon/claude-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- twistedmelonman/claude-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- gerardbalaoro/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- tarrragon/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use handoff, tdd and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 5 projects that use this
GoogleSkilltdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions32 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 32
- humanlayer/humanlayer★ 13ksame name
- danyuchn/asd-ste100-skill★ 6.2ksame name
- filipstrand/mflux★ 2.6ksame name
- nuelcyoung/asd-ste100★ 39same name
- cfcosta/writing-styles★ 32same name
- prithivrajmu/asd-ste100★ 16same name
- nateslabach/skills★ 6same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
- A-Ariyanto/ASD-STE100-skill★ 4same name
- Ahm3tJ4f/skills★ 4same name
22 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- challenge-planSkill
- visual-apiSkill
- visual-explainerSkill
- visual-planSkill
- visual-schemaSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 31 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Write English in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English.
- Distinctive: line 50
Do not write a marketing phrase, a tagline, or an abstract slogan.
- Very specific: line 62
If the project has no CONTEXT.md, do not invent one.
- Distinctive: line 68
Never drop a fact, a condition, a caveat, or a scope qualifier to meet a limit.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 31 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ASD-STE100 — Simplified Technical English
Write English in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English. STE is a controlled language. The aerospace industry built it so a reader who cannot ask a follow-up question still reads the text one way only. The rules are countable. Check your prose against them as you write.
When to use
- A skill requires it. The
visual-explainerandvisual-planskills require it for every human-readable string in their output. - The user asks for Simplified Technical English, or for plain, unambiguous prose.
Precedence
These rules set the default shape of the English you write. A more specific instruction takes precedence on whatever it addresses. This includes an instruction from the user, from project instructions, from an invoked skill, or from an established convention in the file you edit. Where the more specific instruction is silent, these rules apply.
Follow the more specific instruction without comment. Do not cite this style as a reason to override it. Do not ask permission. This exception applies to an explicit instruction only. Do not relax these rules because a topic feels casual or because other prose seems friendlier.
Never apply these rules to
- Code. This includes identifiers, syntax, and string literals.
- Quoted material. This includes error output, command output, file contents, and another person's words. To rewrite a quotation is falsification, not simplification.
- Text where the exact wording carries the meaning. This includes a command to run, an API name, a config key, and an exact error string.
Rules
| Rule | Limit |
| Noun clusters | Maximum 3 words stacked as a modifier. Break a longer stack apart and name the relationship. |
| Sentence length | Maximum 20 words for an instruction or a procedure. Maximum 25 words for descriptive text. |
| One instruction per sentence | Do not join two instructions with "and" or "then". |
| Active voice | Use the passive voice in descriptive text only, and only when the actor is unknown or irrelevant. |
| Simple tenses only | Use the infinitive, the imperative, the simple present, the simple past, and the simple future. Use a past participle as an adjective only. Do not use the present perfect, the past perfect, or a compound auxiliary. |
No -ing verb forms | Use an -ing word as a technical noun, or as part of one, only. |
| No hedge stacking | Do not chain modal verbs, as in "may have been caused by". State the uncertainty as its own plain sentence: "The cause is not confirmed." |
| One word, one meaning | Use one term for one concept and repeat it. Do not rotate synonyms for the same idea. |
| Plainest available word | Prefer the short common word to the formal or rare word. |
| Define domain terms | Define a term that is not common English at its first use. Do not carry undefined shorthand forward. |
| No ellipsis | Keep the subject, the verb, and the article explicit, even when the sentence reads longer. |
| Paragraphs | One topic. Maximum 6 sentences. |
| Vertical lists | Use a numbered or bulleted list for 3 or more steps or conditions. |
Headings and titles
A heading names its subject. It is not a slogan. A reader who sees only the heading must understand what the section is about.
- Name the real workflow, system, page, endpoint, or step.
- Do not write a marketing phrase, a tagline, or an abstract slogan.
- Bad (slogan): "From customer task to phone conversation".
- Good (plain): "How the phone-call workflow works".
This rule applies to every title, scene heading, and section heading.
Project vocabulary
STE permits a project to define its own approved vocabulary of technical nouns and verbs. A CONTEXT.md file at a repository root is that vocabulary.
If the project has a CONTEXT.md, use its terms exactly as it defines them, in the part of speech it defines. Never substitute a synonym for a term it defines. Never use a word that its _Avoid_ lines reject. Do not redefine its terms inline, because the glossary is the definition.
If the project has no CONTEXT.md, do not invent one. Do not present any term as already established. The rules above apply without change: define a term at first use, prefer the plainest word, and use one term for one concept.
Length is not terseness
The caps apply to each sentence, not to the response. Clarity is the goal, not concision. A long answer in short sentences is correct.
Never drop a fact, a condition, a caveat, or a scope qualifier to meet a limit. Split the sentence instead.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

