agentleFS
parhambparhamb/design-skills/ux-content/SKILL.md

ux-content

Skill21 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Content strategy and UX writing: plain language, microcopy, labeling, read/unread states, localization, and content freshness. Use when writing or reviewing UI copy, error messages, empty states, tooltips, onboarding text, or any in-product content.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every word in your UI is a design decision.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Avoid: "Something went wrong."

    line 34
  3. Distinctive:

    Use: "We couldn't save your photo.

    line 35
  4. Distinctive:

    Use: "Create account" / "Send message" / "Place order"

    line 39
  5. Distinctive:

    Avoid: "To complete your order, please enter your card details below."

    line 42
  6. Distinctive:

    Use: "Enter your card details to complete the order."

    line 43
  7. Distinctive:

    Leave 30 to 40% expansion space for German, Finnish, and Russian translations.

    line 68
  8. Distinctive:

    When applying this checklist to a screen, flow, or codebase:

    line 77

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Content and UX Writing

Every word in your UI is a design decision. Good UX writing reduces friction, builds trust, and guides users to their next step. It carries the same weight as visual design.


Checklist

ItemGuidance
Plain languageWrite at a 7th-grade reading level. Short sentences and common words.
Data accuracyUser-entered data is validated and shown back correctly. No stale values.
UGC distinctionUser-generated content is in a visually distinct container from editorial content.
Read and unread indicatorsRead and unread items are visually differentiated with a bold title or a colored dot.
Localization qualityTranslations are reviewed by native speakers. Machine translation alone is not sufficient.
Content freshnessOutdated content is flagged, archived, or removed after a defined threshold.

UX Writing Principles

Be specific, not vague

  • Avoid: "Something went wrong."
  • Use: "We couldn't save your photo. Check your connection and try again."

Write for the action, not the object

  • Avoid: "Submit"
  • Use: "Create account" / "Send message" / "Place order"

Front-load the key information

  • Avoid: "To complete your order, please enter your card details below."
  • Use: "Enter your card details to complete the order."

Be consistent with terminology Pick one word for one concept and use it everywhere. If one screen says "Save" another should not say "Store" or "Keep" for the same action.


Microcopy Patterns

ContextPattern
ButtonVerb plus noun: "Download report", "Add photo"
Destructive buttonSpecific verb: "Delete account", not "OK"
Placeholder textA genuine hint, not a repeated label: "Search by city or ZIP"
Error messageWhat happened and how to fix it
Success messageConfirm the action and suggest the next step
Loading textWhat is loading: "Uploading photo..." not just "Loading..."
Empty state headlineEmpathetic and forward-looking (full standards in ux-error-handling)

Localization Notes

Strings should never be concatenated. Use placeholders: "Hello, %@" not "Hello, " + name. Leave 30 to 40% expansion space for German, Finnish, and Russian translations. Date, time, number, and currency formats are locale-specific — always use platform formatters, never hardcode them. Right-to-left languages require layout mirroring, not just a text direction change.


How to Review

When applying this checklist to a screen, flow, or codebase:

  1. Go through every checklist item and mark it Pass, Fail, or N/A — never skip items silently.
  2. Cite specific evidence for each finding: the screen, component, file, or line it applies to.
  3. Tag each failure with a severity: Blocker (breaks the experience), Major (hurts usability), or Minor (polish).
  4. End the review with the top 3 recommended fixes, ranked by user impact.

Related Skills

  • ux-error-handling — the error message formula and empty-state standards
  • ux-forms — labels, placeholders, and validation copy
  • ux-accessibility — plain language as an accessibility requirement

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.