recall-reasoning

---
name: recall-reasoning
description: Search past reasoning for relevant decisions and approaches
user-invocable: false
---

# Recall Past Work

Search through previous sessions to find relevant decisions, approaches that worked, and approaches that failed. Queries two sources:

1. **Artifact Index** - Handoffs, plans, ledgers with post-mortems (what worked/failed)
2. **Reasoning Files** - Build attempts, test failures, commit context

## When to Use

- Starting work similar to past sessions
- "What did we do last time with X?"
- Looking for patterns that worked before
- Investigating why something was done a certain way
- Debugging an issue encountered previously

## Usage

### Primary: Artifact Index (rich context)

```bash
uv run python scripts/core/artifact_query.py "<query>" [--outcome SUCCEEDED|FAILED] [--limit N]
```

This searches handoffs with post-mortems (what worked, what failed, key decisions).

### Secondary: Reasoning Files (build attempts)

```bash
bash "$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/.claude/scripts/search-reasoning.sh" "<query>"
```

This searches `.git/claude/commits/*/reasoning.md` for build failures and fixes.

## Examples

```bash
# Search for authentication-related work
uv run python scripts/core/artifact_query.py "authentication OAuth JWT"

# Find only successful approaches
uv run python scripts/core/artifact_query.py "implement agent" --outcome SUCCEEDED

# Find what failed (to avoid repeating mistakes)
uv run python scripts/core/artifact_query.py "hook implementation" --outcome FAILED

# Search build/test reasoning
bash "$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/.claude/scripts/search-reasoning.sh" "TypeError"
```

## What Gets Searched

**Artifact Index** (handoffs, plans, ledgers):
- Task summaries and status
- **What worked** - Successful approaches
- **What failed** - Dead ends and why
- **Key decisions** - Choices with rationale
- Goal and constraints from ledgers

**Reasoning Files** (`.git/claude/`):
- Failed build attempts and error output
- Successful builds after failures
- Commit context and branch info

## Interpreting Results

**From Artifact Index:**
- `✓` = SUCCEEDED outcome (pattern to follow)
- `✗` = FAILED outcome (pattern to avoid)
- `?` = UNKNOWN outcome (not yet marked)
- Post-mortem sections show distilled learnings

**From Reasoning:**
- `build_fail` = approach that didn't work
- `build_pass` = what finally succeeded
- Multiple failures before success = non-trivial problem

## Process

1. **Run Artifact Index query first** - richer context, post-mortems
2. **Review relevant handoffs** - check what worked/failed sections
3. **If needed, search reasoning** - for specific build errors
4. **Apply learnings** - follow successful patterns, avoid failed ones

## No Results?

**Artifact Index empty:**
- Run `uv run python scripts/core/artifact_index.py --all` to index existing handoffs
- Create handoffs with post-mortem sections for future recall

**Reasoning files empty:**
- Use `/commit` after builds to capture reasoning
- Check if `.git/claude/` directory exists

More agent context in parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2

107 other files this repository gives its agents, the first 60 shown.

Also found in one other repository

The same file, byte for byte, in the weekly crawl of public GitHub.

• parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33.9k