plain-english
Skill10 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub
Translates technical content into plain English for non-technical stakeholders by converting jargon into business language, surfacing decisions and impact early, and producing actionable recommendations with clear ownership and timeline. Use when the user asks to simplify technical content, write an executive summary, explain something in layman's terms, rewrite for non-technical audiences, or translate jargon for management or stakeholders. Applies to document types such as technical reports, architecture decision records, incident summaries, risk assessments, and status updates. Distinct from general writing or documentation skills by its focus on audience identification, decision-first structure, and jargon elimination for non-technical readers.
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- joelio/plain-englishtheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- niksavis/handilytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- niksavis/basiclytheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- sorawit-w/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ptrandev/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- meowdiocre/meowpitheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use find-skills.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
VercelSkillfind-skills
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- b1rdmania/claude-plain-english-skill★ 46same name
- Tradelord223/plain-english★ 14same name
- joelio/plain-english★ 9same name
- fedemelo/agent-config★ 4same name
- naticorrea-03/claude-code-skills★ 4same name
- Harish-here/maddog★ 3same name
- meowdiocre/meowpi★ 3same name
- CorySchulz/skills★ 2same name
- JoseArron/skills★ 2same name
- niksavis/basicly★ 2same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository81 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/development/biome-complete/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/development/bun-development/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/development/commanderjs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/documentation/markdown-authoring/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/package-mgmt/mise-complete/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/testing/bdd-testing/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agents-mdSkill
- cache-auditSkill
- context-radar-auditSkill
- create-contextSkill
- guided-interviewSkill
- handover-document-creatorSkill
- load-contextSkill
- pick-modelSkill
- pinSkill
- professional-honestySkill
- rules-managementSkill
- save-contextSkill
- session-reflectionSkill
- socratic-methodSkill
- vault-captureSkill
- vault-consolidateSkill
- vault-fetchSkill
- vault-searchSkill
- bird-fortune-political-satireSkill
- brooker-esque-media-satireSkill
- clarke-dawe-esqueSkill
- comedy-style-skill-generatorSkill
- cunk-esque-mockumentarySkill
- gervais-esque-cringe-satireSkill
- monty-python-esqueSkill
- pryor-esque-confessional-standupSkill
- rock-esque-observational-standupSkill
- biome-completeSkill
- bun-developmentSkill
- commanderjsSkill
- conventional-commitsSkill
- humanizerSkill
- journal-entry-importSkill
- markdown-authoringSkill
- mermaid-diagramsSkill
- professional-communicationSkill
- sop-structureSkill
- logql-generatorSkill
- mise-completeSkill
- context-indexSkill
- create-context-fileSkill
- follow-upSkill
- goal-trackerSkill
- nasa-pm-lessonsSkill
- plan-createSkill
- plan-executeSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- risk-registerSkill
- tech-debtSkill
- tech-evaluationSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- bridgeSkill
- challengeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
Before writing a single word, ask:
- Distinctive: line 46
If a reader only reads the opening, they must still know what to do.
- Distinctive: line 74
Every action item MUST follow:
- Distinctive: line 107
Hard rules: ALWAYS state audience · ALWAYS define acronyms · ALWAYS lead with key message for executives · NEVER hide decisions · NEVER use …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Plain English Writing
Translates technical content into decision-ready communication for non-technical stakeholders.
When to Use
Apply when writing for: executives, business managers, compliance/legal, or cross-functional stakeholders without the requesting team's domain knowledge.
When Not to Use
Skip when writing for engineers or technical specialists. You may optionally apply selective translation for mixed audiences; consider keeping technical depth for peer reviews or developer-facing docs.
Mindset
Technical writing optimises for completeness. Plain-English writing optimises for decisions.
Before writing a single word, ask:
"What does this person need to decide or do — and what is the minimum information required for that?"
The single most reliable fix: move the recommendation to sentence one. Everything else is secondary.
Decision Framework
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OPENING (required) │
│ Problem + Business impact + Action needed │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUPPORTING CONTEXT (only if needed) │
│ Background / Options / Tradeoffs / Timeline │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ APPENDIX (optional) │
│ Technical detail / Metrics / Implementation │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘If a reader only reads the opening, they must still know what to do.
Workflow
Step 1: Identify Audience
executive (zero jargon) | manager (minimal jargon) | compliance/legal (tech translated) | cross-functional (inline definitions). See references/constraints-and-fallbacks.md for the audience depth guide.
If unknown: Audience: unknown. Applying manager-level clarity (fallback).
Step 2: Define the Outcome
One sentence — what must the reader decide or do? Write it before drafting.
Step 3: Draft Key Message First
Opening must contain: problem + business impact + required action.
BAD: [3 paragraphs of background] "...we recommend approving the budget."
GOOD: "We need your approval for a $50k security fix by Thursday. [Impact follows.]"Step 4: Add Supporting Context
Every action item MUST follow:
[Owner] must [specific action] by [concrete deadline].BAD: "The database should be optimized."
GOOD: "Database team (Alex) must optimize query performance by March 15."For acronym-heavy documents, extract all acronyms first:
grep -oE '\b[A-Z]{2,}\b' file.md | sort -uDefine each, then draft — rewrite still leads with key message, not the glossary.
Step 5: Verify
- [ ] Every acronym defined on first use.
- [ ] Opening paragraph contains the key decision or recommendation.
- [ ] All technical terms translated — no unexplained jargon.
- [ ] Every action: [Owner] must [action] by [deadline].
- [ ] Paragraphs are concise and scannable.Constraints
Hard rules: ALWAYS state audience · ALWAYS define acronyms · ALWAYS lead with key message for executives · NEVER hide decisions · NEVER use passive voice for owned actions · NEVER leave deadlines undefined · NEVER present options without a recommendation.
Fallback paths (state explicitly at the top of your output before writing):
| Situation | Prefix |
| Unknown audience | Audience: unknown. Applying manager-level clarity (fallback). |
| Unknown terminology | Define inline: "TLS (the encryption protocol that keeps data private)" |
| Conflicting priorities | Multiple critical issues — leading with risk and deadlines. |
Full formats: references/constraints-and-fallbacks.md.
Anti-Patterns
Full catalogue: references/anti-patterns.md.
| # | Anti-pattern | Fix |
| AP-1 | Jargon without translation | ALWAYS translate or remove every specialist term |
| AP-2 | Buried key decision | ALWAYS put recommendation in sentence one |
| AP-3 | Passive action language | NEVER use passive voice; use [Owner] must [action] by [deadline] |
| AP-4 | Assumed technical context | NEVER assume prior knowledge; explain from first principles |
| AP-5 | Wall of acronyms | ALWAYS define each acronym on first use |
| AP-6 | Recommendations without deadlines | NEVER leave deadlines undefined; undated = ignored |
| AP-7 | Options without a recommendation | NEVER present options without stating which you recommend |
| AP-8 | Skipping audience identification | ALWAYS start with audience and goal |
References
| File | Purpose |
| references/audience-types.md | Audience format and depth guidance |
| references/jargon-translations.md | Technical-to-plain-language mappings |
| references/anti-patterns.md | Full anti-pattern catalogue with BAD/GOOD examples |
| references/before-after-examples.md | Complete before/after rewrites for 5 document types |
| references/constraints-and-fallbacks.md | Full constraint rules, fallback formats, audience depth guide |
External: PlainLanguage.gov
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

