agentleFS
pantheon-orgpantheon-org/tekhne/skills/documentation/plain-english/SKILL.md

plain-english

Skill10 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub

Translates technical content into plain English for non-technical stakeholders by converting jargon into business language, surfacing decisions and impact early, and producing actionable recommendations with clear ownership and timeline. Use when the user asks to simplify technical content, write an executive summary, explain something in layman's terms, rewrite for non-technical audiences, or translate jargon for management or stakeholders. Applies to document types such as technical reports, architecture decision records, incident summaries, risk assessments, and status updates. Distinct from general writing or documentation skills by its focus on audience identification, decision-first structure, and jargon elimination for non-technical readers.

17 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use find-skills.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • VercelSkill

    find-skills

    Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before writing a single word, ask:

    line 25
  2. Distinctive:

    If a reader only reads the opening, they must still know what to do.

    line 46
  3. Distinctive:

    Every action item MUST follow:

    line 74
  4. Distinctive:

    Hard rules: ALWAYS state audience · ALWAYS define acronyms · ALWAYS lead with key message for executives · NEVER hide decisions · NEVER use …

    line 107

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Plain English Writing

Translates technical content into decision-ready communication for non-technical stakeholders.

When to Use

Apply when writing for: executives, business managers, compliance/legal, or cross-functional stakeholders without the requesting team's domain knowledge.

When Not to Use

Skip when writing for engineers or technical specialists. You may optionally apply selective translation for mixed audiences; consider keeping technical depth for peer reviews or developer-facing docs.

Mindset

Technical writing optimises for completeness. Plain-English writing optimises for decisions.

Before writing a single word, ask:

"What does this person need to decide or do — and what is the minimum information required for that?"

The single most reliable fix: move the recommendation to sentence one. Everything else is secondary.

Decision Framework

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  OPENING (required)                          │
│  Problem + Business impact + Action needed   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  SUPPORTING CONTEXT (only if needed)         │
│  Background / Options / Tradeoffs / Timeline │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  APPENDIX (optional)                         │
│  Technical detail / Metrics / Implementation │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

If a reader only reads the opening, they must still know what to do.


Workflow

Step 1: Identify Audience

executive (zero jargon) | manager (minimal jargon) | compliance/legal (tech translated) | cross-functional (inline definitions). See references/constraints-and-fallbacks.md for the audience depth guide.

If unknown: Audience: unknown. Applying manager-level clarity (fallback).

Step 2: Define the Outcome

One sentence — what must the reader decide or do? Write it before drafting.

Step 3: Draft Key Message First

Opening must contain: problem + business impact + required action.

BAD:  [3 paragraphs of background] "...we recommend approving the budget."
GOOD: "We need your approval for a $50k security fix by Thursday. [Impact follows.]"

Step 4: Add Supporting Context

Every action item MUST follow:

[Owner] must [specific action] by [concrete deadline].
BAD:  "The database should be optimized."
GOOD: "Database team (Alex) must optimize query performance by March 15."

For acronym-heavy documents, extract all acronyms first:

grep -oE '\b[A-Z]{2,}\b' file.md | sort -u

Define each, then draft — rewrite still leads with key message, not the glossary.

Step 5: Verify

- [ ] Every acronym defined on first use.
- [ ] Opening paragraph contains the key decision or recommendation.
- [ ] All technical terms translated — no unexplained jargon.
- [ ] Every action: [Owner] must [action] by [deadline].
- [ ] Paragraphs are concise and scannable.

Constraints

Hard rules: ALWAYS state audience · ALWAYS define acronyms · ALWAYS lead with key message for executives · NEVER hide decisions · NEVER use passive voice for owned actions · NEVER leave deadlines undefined · NEVER present options without a recommendation.

Fallback paths (state explicitly at the top of your output before writing):

SituationPrefix
Unknown audienceAudience: unknown. Applying manager-level clarity (fallback).
Unknown terminologyDefine inline: "TLS (the encryption protocol that keeps data private)"
Conflicting prioritiesMultiple critical issues — leading with risk and deadlines.

Full formats: references/constraints-and-fallbacks.md.


Anti-Patterns

Full catalogue: references/anti-patterns.md.

#Anti-patternFix
AP-1Jargon without translationALWAYS translate or remove every specialist term
AP-2Buried key decisionALWAYS put recommendation in sentence one
AP-3Passive action languageNEVER use passive voice; use [Owner] must [action] by [deadline]
AP-4Assumed technical contextNEVER assume prior knowledge; explain from first principles
AP-5Wall of acronymsALWAYS define each acronym on first use
AP-6Recommendations without deadlinesNEVER leave deadlines undefined; undated = ignored
AP-7Options without a recommendationNEVER present options without stating which you recommend
AP-8Skipping audience identificationALWAYS start with audience and goal

References

FilePurpose
references/audience-types.mdAudience format and depth guidance
references/jargon-translations.mdTechnical-to-plain-language mappings
references/anti-patterns.mdFull anti-pattern catalogue with BAD/GOOD examples
references/before-after-examples.mdComplete before/after rewrites for 5 document types
references/constraints-and-fallbacks.mdFull constraint rules, fallback formats, audience depth guide

External: PlainLanguage.gov

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.