agentleFS
pablocaegpablocaeg/claude-army/skills/create-team/SKILL.md

create-team

Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create a team of specialized agents based on the project analysis. Run /claude-army:analyze first. Generates agents in ~/.claude/agents/ with full subagent support.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions3 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 3

    1. marinvch/Cortex★ 1same name
    2. stefanwb/claude-shared★ 1same name
    3. mangococo/claude-skills★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Create a team of specialized Claude Code agents based on the forge analysis.

    line 7
  2. Very specific:

    Read .context/forge-analysis.md — this contains the project analysis from /claude-army:analyze

    line 11
  3. Very specific:

    If the file doesn't exist, tell the user to run /claude-army:analyze first

    line 12
  4. Very specific:

    Read the templates in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/ for agent archetypes

    line 13
  5. Very specific:

    All agents use the prefix <project>-:

    line 21
  6. Very specific:

    Must have Agent in tools list

    line 71
  7. Distinctive:

    Every code template must come from the actual project (read real files, don't use generic patterns)

    line 86
  8. Distinctive:

    Every reviewer concern must be a real quote from the analysis

    line 87
  9. Distinctive:

    Every test pattern must match the project's existing tests

    line 88
  10. Distinctive:

    No hardcoded absolute paths — use project discovery

    line 89
  11. Very specific:

    All agents use model: opus

    line 90
  12. Distinctive:

    After creating all agents, show the user:

    line 94

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Create a team of specialized Claude Code agents based on the forge analysis. Agents are written to ~/.claude/agents/ so they have full subagent spawning support.

Before Starting

  1. Read .context/forge-analysis.md — this contains the project analysis from /claude-army:analyze
  2. If the file doesn't exist, tell the user to run /claude-army:analyze first
  3. Read the templates in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/ for agent archetypes

Agent Creation Process

For each agent, read the matching template from ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/, fill in project-specific details from the analysis, and write to ~/.claude/agents/.

Naming Convention

All agents use the prefix <project>-:

  • <project>-researcher.md
  • <project>-builder.md
  • <project>-reviewer.md
  • <project>-challenger.md
  • <project>-submitter.md
  • <project>-orchestrator.md
  • <project>-expert.md
  • <project>-test-writer.md

What Goes Into Each Agent

Researcher — from analysis:

  • What information the builder needs
  • What verification is required
  • Pre-checks (duplicates, open PRs)

Builder — from analysis:

  • Code patterns section → exact templates
  • Registration/integration pattern
  • Build/generate commands

Reviewer — from analysis:

  • Linter rules
  • Test conventions
  • PR checklist
  • CI requirements

Challenger — from analysis:

  • Lead reviewer name
  • Tiered review patterns with exact quotes
  • Things NOT to flag
  • Fix routing to other agents

Submitter — from analysis:

  • PR title format
  • PR body structure
  • Git workflow (branch naming, commit style)
  • Checklist from PR template

Orchestrator — chains all agents:

  • Phase 1: Spawn <project>-researcher
  • Pause: User confirms research
  • Phase 2: Spawn <project>-builder
  • Phase 3: Run tests (self)
  • Phase 4: Spawn <project>-reviewer, fix issues
  • Phase 5: Spawn <project>-challenger, fix issues
  • Pause: User confirms ready
  • Phase 6: Spawn <project>-submitter
  • Pause: User confirms push
  • Must have Agent in tools list

Expert — from analysis:

  • Architecture map
  • Package purposes
  • Entry points table

Test Writer — from analysis:

  • Test package naming
  • Assertion patterns
  • Fixture styles
  • Coverage target

Grounding Rules

  • Every code template must come from the actual project (read real files, don't use generic patterns)
  • Every reviewer concern must be a real quote from the analysis
  • Every test pattern must match the project's existing tests
  • No hardcoded absolute paths — use project discovery
  • All agents use model: opus

Output

After creating all agents, show the user:

  1. List of agents created with their paths
  2. The orchestrator pipeline diagram
  3. How to run: @<project>-orchestrator [task description]
  4. Reminder that they can customize any agent by editing the file directly

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.