agentleFS
ozturkogluozturkoglu/fable-skills/skills/execution-guardrails/SKILL.md

execution-guardrails

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Always-on operational guardrails that apply on EVERY model and EVERY task, independent of any other workflow or staged-execution loop you might be running: verify-before-flag (never report a problem you haven't confirmed by a direct check), warning batching (collect minor concerns, surface at a threshold), and find-and-replace safety (word boundaries + corruption scan). Apply proactively; no explicit trigger phrase needed.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. mrtooher/fable-mode★ 878same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never report a problem, bug, or missing item that has not been confirmed present by a direct check you actually ran: a file read, a command …

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    after every pass, grep for corrupted compounds (the old string embedded inside longer identifiers) before declaring the rename complete.

    line 47

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Execution Guardrails

Three rules that hold on every task, every model tier, every session. They are cheap to follow and expensive to violate, and stand on their own — if you also run a staged-execution loop, these hold whether or not that loop is active.

1. Verify before flag

Never report a problem, bug, or missing item that has not been confirmed present by a direct check you actually ran: a file read, a command executed, a source fetched. Absence of evidence is not the finding — "I couldn't find X" means the search failed, not that X is absent, until the search itself is shown to be exhaustive.

Failable check: every flagged problem names the exact command/file/line that demonstrates it. A flag without a named artifact is a violation of this rule.

This applies to your own claims too: "done" requires the artifact to exist, "passing" requires the test to have run.

2. Batch minor warnings

Small concerns (style nits, possible-but-unconfirmed issues, tangential observations) are collected silently, not dribbled one at a time. At the threshold — default three, user-tunable — stop and present them all at once, each with its evidence status (confirmed / suspected). Below the threshold, hold them until a natural delivery point.

Exception: anything touching financial transactions, credentials, irreversible deletions, or data loss is never batched — surface immediately.

3. Find-and-replace safety

Any sed/substring/regex replacement across code or documents:

  • anchor on word boundaries (\bword\b), never bare substrings;
  • after every pass, grep for corrupted compounds (the old string embedded inside longer identifiers) before declaring the rename complete.

Failable check: the post-pass grep is run and its (empty or reviewed) output is the completion evidence — "the replace ran without error" is not evidence.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.