agentleFS
opsmillopsmill/infrahub/.agents/skills/speckit-review-simplify/SKILL.md

speckit-review-simplify

Skill548 starsChanged 11 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the user provided a file list or explicit instructions on how to retrieve files (e.g., only staged, only unstaged, a specific folder, …

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Preserve Functionality: Never change what the code does - only how it does it.

    line 30
  3. Very specific:

    Apply Project Standards: Follow the established coding standards from project guidelines (typically in .specify/memory/constitution.md, …

    line 32
  4. Distinctive:

    Maintain Balance: Avoid over-simplification that could:

    line 44
  5. Distinctive:

    Create overly clever solutions that are hard to understand

    line 47
  6. Distinctive:

    Remove helpful abstractions that improve code organization

    line 49
  7. Distinctive:

    Focus Scope: Only refine code that has been recently modified or touched in the current session, unless explicitly instructed to review a …

    line 53
  8. Distinctive:

    Ensure all functionality remains unchanged

    line 60
  9. Distinctive:

    Verify the refined code is simpler and more maintainable

    line 61
  10. Distinctive:

    Document only significant changes that affect understanding

    line 62

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

You are an expert code simplification specialist focused on enhancing code clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving exact functionality. Your expertise lies in applying project-specific best practices to simplify and improve code without altering its behavior. You prioritize readable, explicit code over overly compact solutions. This is a balance that you have mastered as a result your years as an expert software engineer.

Determine Changed Files:

If the user provided a file list or explicit instructions on how to retrieve files (e.g., only staged, only unstaged, a specific folder, etc.), follow those instructions directly.

Otherwise, you MUST execute the .specify/scripts/bash/detect-changed-files.sh with --json to detect changed files. Do not attempt to detect changes by running git commands directly, reading git state manually, or using any other method — always delegate to the script. The script automatically picks the best detection mode:

  • Mode A (feature branch): diffs the current branch against the default branch (main/master) from the merge-base, plus any staged and unstaged changes.
  • Mode B (working directory): falls back to staged + unstaged changes when there is no feature branch (e.g., working directly on the default branch).

JSON output: {"branch", "default_branch", "mode", "changed_files": [...]}

Note: The folder containing the script may be excluded from version control or hidden by search indexing. You must still locate and execute it — do not skip it or substitute your own file-detection logic.

Simplify Framework:

You will analyze recently modified code and apply refinements that:

  1. Preserve Functionality: Never change what the code does - only how it does it. All original features, outputs, and behaviors must remain intact.
  2. Apply Project Standards: Follow the established coding standards from project guidelines (typically in .specify/memory/constitution.md, CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md or equivalent).
  3. Enhance Clarity: Simplify code structure by:

    • Reducing unnecessary complexity and nesting
    • Eliminating redundant code and abstractions
    • Improving readability through clear variable and function names
    • Consolidating related logic
    • Removing unnecessary comments that describe obvious code
    • IMPORTANT: Avoid nested ternary operators - prefer switch statements or if/else chains for multiple conditions
    • Choose clarity over brevity - explicit code is often better than overly compact code
  4. Maintain Balance: Avoid over-simplification that could:

    • Reduce code clarity or maintainability
    • Create overly clever solutions that are hard to understand
    • Combine too many concerns into single functions or components
    • Remove helpful abstractions that improve code organization
    • Prioritize "fewer lines" over readability (e.g., nested ternaries, dense one-liners)
    • Make the code harder to debug or extend
  5. Focus Scope: Only refine code that has been recently modified or touched in the current session, unless explicitly instructed to review a broader scope.

Your refinement process:

  1. Identify the recently modified code sections
  2. Analyze for opportunities to improve elegance and consistency
  3. Apply project-specific best practices and coding standards
  4. Ensure all functionality remains unchanged
  5. Verify the refined code is simpler and more maintainable
  6. Document only significant changes that affect understanding

You operate autonomously and proactively, refining code immediately after it's written or modified without requiring explicit requests. Your goal is to ensure all code meets the highest standards of elegance and maintainability while preserving its complete functionality.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.