agentleFS
openclawopenclaw/openclaw/.agents/skills/control-ui-e2e/SKILL.md

control-ui-e2e

Skill391k starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when designing, testing, fixing, or extending the OpenClaw Control UI GUI, including UI stress-test galleries with feedback inputs, Vitest + Playwright end-to-end checks, mocked Gateway flows, screenshots/videos, or agent-verifiable browser proof.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

18 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 10

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this for Control UI design feedback and real browser flows with deterministic Gateway data.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Use it when changing layouts, interactions, or components with multiple states.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Before requesting feedback, inspect the rendered examples at relevant viewport sizes and verify that feedback survives a refresh and …

    line 35
  4. Very specific:

    Use ui/src//*.e2e.test.ts for full GUI flows.

    line 45
  5. Very specific:

    Use ui/src/test-helpers/control-ui-e2e.ts to start the Vite Control UI and install a mocked Gateway WebSocket.

    line 46
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep scenarios deterministic.

    line 47
  7. Very specific:

    Prefer existing .browser.test.ts or unit tests for narrow rendering logic.

    line 48
  8. Distinctive:

    Run the whole local lane in a normal checkout:

    line 58
  9. Distinctive:

    Use an existing ready dependency installation or a prepared normal checkout.

    line 64
  10. Distinctive:

    Keep the Vitest E2E assertions deterministic.

    line 75
  11. Very specific:

    After or alongside the focused E2E test, run the mocked Control UI app when available, for example pnpm dev:ui:mock -- --port <port>.

    line 81
  12. Very specific:

    Use browser.newContext({ recordVideo: { dir, size }, viewport }), page.screenshot({ path }), and close the context before reporting the …

    line 84
  13. Distinctive:

    Treat recording as validation, not only demo capture.

    line 90
  14. Distinctive:

    If visual proof is blocked, state the exact blocker and still report the textual E2E evidence.

    line 91
  15. Very specific:

    Start the app server, install the mock before page.goto, then assert both Gateway traffic and visible UI:

    line 95
  16. Very specific:

    Use withControlUiRunInspector from ui/src/test-helpers/control-ui-run-inspector.ts for collection.

    line 117
  17. Very specific:

    When recording an already-running mocked Control UI URL, use a temporary Playwright script or playwright test spec and keep the recording …

    line 142
  18. Distinctive:

    Use short sleeps only after assertions to make the captured video readable.

    line 146

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Control UI E2E

Use this for Control UI design feedback and real browser flows with deterministic Gateway data.

UI Stress Test

For substantial UI changes, build a local HTML stress-test gallery early so the user can compare meaningful states and give feedback against concrete examples. Use it when changing layouts, interactions, or components with multiple states; small copy or icon edits can skip it when a gallery adds no useful comparison.

  1. Derive examples from the affected components and their data contracts. Cover the relevant normal, loading, empty, error, unavailable, permission, selected, and expanded states, plus long text or dense content where they stress the layout. Show mutually exclusive states separately; label proposed states that the current implementation does not support.
  2. Build one browser-openable HTML overview with stable example IDs, short state labels, and enough context to understand each example. Prefer real components and deterministic mock fixtures. Label static or approximate renderings and link to the running UI for interactions they cannot reproduce. Keep generated galleries in task-owned artifact storage rather than committing them by default.
  3. Give every example a labeled feedback input. Persist feedback locally across refreshes using a gallery-specific storage key and stable example IDs. Include a Copy feedback action that exports the example IDs, state labels, and comments as Markdown or plain text for the user to return to the conversation.
  4. Open the gallery in the available preview browser and share its URL or file path. Keep the same gallery and example IDs during iteration, preserving existing comments as examples change. Apply the user's feedback to both the gallery and the implementation so they remain comparable.
  5. Before requesting feedback, inspect the rendered examples at relevant viewport sizes and verify that feedback survives a refresh and exports with the correct example labels. Report any unsupported states or preview limitations.

The gallery supports design review; it does not replace focused behavior tests or inspected before/after proof from the running UI. Preserve final proof using the fresh capture directories described below, separately from the evolving gallery.

Test Shape

  • Use ui/src/**/*.e2e.test.ts for full GUI flows.
  • Use ui/src/test-helpers/control-ui-e2e.ts to start the Vite Control UI and install a mocked Gateway WebSocket.
  • Keep scenarios deterministic. Do not use live provider keys, real channel credentials, or a real Gateway unless the user explicitly asks for live proof.
  • Prefer existing .browser.test.ts or unit tests for narrow rendering logic; use this E2E lane when the proof should cover routing, app boot, Gateway handshake, requests, and visible UI behavior together.

Commands

  • Target one E2E test in a Codex worktree:
node scripts/run-vitest.mjs run --config test/vitest/vitest.ui-e2e.config.ts --configLoader runner ui/src/e2e/chat-flow.messaging.e2e.test.ts
  • Run the whole local lane in a normal checkout:
pnpm test:ui:e2e

Use an existing ready dependency installation or a prepared normal checkout; do not reconcile a shared install while other jobs use it. Follow $openclaw-testing: trusted development proof may run locally, and remote proof needs a browser/platform, clean-environment, or source-isolation reason.

Visual Proof Default

For appearance changes, capture inspected before/after visual evidence. For other behavior, use the clearest appropriate boundary proof; a video and a screenshot set are not mandatory when assertions already demonstrate the change.

  • Keep the Vitest E2E assertions deterministic; do not commit generated screenshots or videos.
  • The shared suite disables Chromium partial rasterization and GPU rasterization to avoid observed paint-history-dependent edge pixels. Exact repeat comparisons are still required before claiming reproducibility.
  • For transient states such as Saved, install page.clock before the fixture, pause it with pauseVirtualClock, and advance only the fixture work needed to enter that state. setFixedTime alone does not pause timers. Capture readiness uses native layout delivery without advancing the fixture clock.
  • For stills, use takeControlUiScreenshotFrame from ui/src/test-helpers/control-ui-e2e-screenshot.ts with explicit semantic content and animations: "disabled". Pass viewport changes and the intended scroll target through its viewport/scrollTo options; it verifies retained centering, viewport/scroll-clip intersection, and settled layout, fonts, and visible images.
  • Pass all related element locators in elements, then save the returned page PNG and crops from that single frame. Crops enclose fractional bounds in measured PNG pixels; dimensions and unchanged bounds are asserted. Do not combine separate page and locator screenshots as same-frame evidence.
  • The default current-frame mode and existing viewport/element helpers preserve recording and sampled animation behavior. Static preparation stays active through bounds measurement and the unclipped capture; full-page proofs must fit the viewport-frame dimensions.
  • After or alongside the focused E2E test, run the mocked Control UI app when available, for example pnpm dev:ui:mock -- --port <port>.
  • Drive Chromium with Playwright against the local mock URL. Capture the states needed to demonstrate the change, using screenshots or a short video.
  • Use browser.newContext({ recordVideo: { dir, size }, viewport }), page.screenshot({ path }), and close the context before reporting the video path.
  • The session-host command-state proof uses viewport-only captures, verified with Playwright 1.62.1 and Chrome 151.0.7922.34 (Linux real Gateway; macOS arm64 synthetic reproduction). Other recording owners have not been migrated or certified by this fix; verify their required screenshot content and finalized video separately. See the verified capture path and upstream limitation.
  • Allocate retained proof with createControlUiE2eArtifactDir(scope, parentDir?) from ui/src/test-helpers/control-ui-e2e-artifacts.ts. Each call atomically creates a fresh directory and logs its actual path. An explicit parent wins, then the trimmed existing OPENCLAW_UI_E2E_ARTIFACT_DIR, then the repository's .artifacts/control-ui-e2e parent. Existing custom output controls select parents; do not add or rewrite env vars to enable capture.
  • Allocate during the test/scenario or beforeEach, once per attempt; standalone scripts allocate once per invocation. Pass the owner explicitly to shared capture helpers. Keep the original gates, feature/stage names, viewports, waits, and recording options. Use distinct filenames for distinct stages and keep screenshots, reports, and video together.
  • Retain successful and failed evidence. Report actual allocated paths, including relocated filename overrides. Manually delete only exact owned directories after review; never clear shared parents before a replay. Disposable build/media fixtures and owned temporary raw video may keep their cleanup. New synthetic captures do not recover overwritten evidence.
  • Timeout diagnostics use fresh children beneath their existing diagnostic parent. Mantis retains every capture attempt under an invocation-owned directory and refuses to overwrite reports. Real-Gateway suites, chat-outbox-*, and chat-attachment-read-lifecycle remain separate owners; coordinate before claiming replay-safe retention there.
  • Treat recording as validation, not only demo capture. If the recorder fails or shows surprising behavior, stop, fix the behavior, add or update a regression test, then rerecord.
  • If visual proof is blocked, state the exact blocker and still report the textual E2E evidence.

Mock Pattern

Start the app server, install the mock before page.goto, then assert both Gateway traffic and visible UI:

const server = await startControlUiE2eServer();
const page = await context.newPage();
const gateway = await installMockGateway(page, {
  historyMessages: [{ role: "assistant", content: [{ type: "text", text: "Ready." }] }],
});

await page.goto(`${server.baseUrl}chat`);
await page.locator(".agent-chat__composer-combobox textarea").fill("hello");
await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Send message" }).click();

const request = await gateway.waitForRequest("chat.send");
await gateway.emitChatFinal({ runId: String(request.params.idempotencyKey), text: "Done." });
await page.getByText("Done.").waitFor();

Extend installMockGateway with typed scenario options or method responses when a new flow needs more Gateway surface.

Run Inspector evidence

Use withControlUiRunInspector from ui/src/test-helpers/control-ui-run-inspector.ts for collection. It owns a separate page, closes it on success or failure, and leaves the caller's Chat page and unsent draft in place. Use preparePage for a mock Gateway or the campaign's existing per-tab authentication setup; a shared browser context does not copy another tab's session-storage token. The helper uses RunInspectorSelector and activityRunInspectorSelectorHref from the rendered component's model, including a selected receipt's decision cursor.

The rendered panel's data-run-id and data-execution-id identify the returned present identity, not just the requested URL. The selected detail's data-receipt-selector-id is DecisionReceiptDisplayV1.selectorId. Missing or ambiguous identity and missing selected receipts must not be treated as matches. These decision selectors are separate from the optional terminal transcript key agent.wait.terminalReceipt.assistantTranscriptIdempotencyKey; never manufacture that key from a DOM selector or history row, or claim its absence is repaired by Inspector evidence. For sidebar run state, the current accessible label is Active run, not Running.

Standalone Recording

For narrated captions, eased target zooms, or fast-forwarded pauses, use the proof-video dev skill. Its standalone template records raw evidence plus a cue sidecar and renders a captioned MP4 with system ffmpeg; keep the raw capture and attach the inspected polished video.

When recording an already-running mocked Control UI URL, use a temporary Playwright script or playwright test spec and keep the recording flow focused:

  • Open the mock URL, interact through stable data-* selectors or user-facing role selectors, and wait on asserted states instead of relying on fixed sleeps.
  • Assert both visible UI state and mocked Gateway traffic for request-driven flows. For example, verify the expected count/row is visible and that sessions.list was called with the expected search, offset, and limit.
  • Use short sleeps only after assertions to make the captured video readable.
  • Store the generated video in the invocation's fresh allocated directory; do not commit it or remove older captures.

Download now (ZIP)

Trending

Less talk lately.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 1 mentionJan 2026: 12 mentionsFeb 2026: 27 mentionsMar 2026: 13 mentionsApr 2026: 5 mentionsMay 2026: 8 mentionsJun 2026: 4 mentionsJul 2026: 8 mentionsAug 2026: 3 mentionsSep 2026: 7 mentionsOct 2026: 4 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the openclaw/openclaw repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about openclaw/openclaw

The biggest 5 of 92 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 92

Talked about on Bluesky, GitHub, the web and Hacker News (92 times).

On Bluesky · 48

43 more on Bluesky

On GitHub · 17

12 more on GitHub

On the web · 15

10 more on the web

On Hacker News · 12

7 more on Hacker News

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.