openclaw-testing
Skill2.2k starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Choose proportional OpenClaw Windows node tests, builds, packaging checks, and runtime proof, then diagnose failures without weakening required gates.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill to select and interpret validation for this repository.
- Distinctive: line 28
Use the classifier as a read-only starting point, then add behavioral proof that path classification cannot infer:
- Distinctive: line 41
If the source tree changes while validation is running, the affected result is stale.
- Distinctive: line 56
Start at the smallest boundary that can fail for the intended regression.
- Very specific: line 77
Do not launch the app or claim runtime behavior from documentation validation.
- Very specific: line 84
Use dotnet test <project> --filter '<expression>' for a class or behavior, then run relevant siblings when shared setup or lifecycle could …
- Very specific: line 119
Use temporary settings directories or set OPENCLAW_TRAY_DATA_DIR before the test process starts.
- Distinctive: line 129
Every code change and every agent code-change closeout requires:
- Very specific: line 142
Add the affected owner project even when it is not one of the two required suites.
- Very specific: line 164
Run the inventory-owned windows-winui-interactive accessibility proof command with the repository wrapper:
- Very specific: line 194
Use win-arm64 on a native ARM64 host.
- Very specific: line 223
Use RevocationAndRecoveryTests or NetworkRecoveryTests in the filter when that is the changed contract.
- Very specific: line 252
Every new Windows node command also needs live local MCP discovery and invocation through winnode, plus the real Gateway path when the …
- Distinctive: line 377
Treat a failure as a defect until evidence identifies product, test fixture, shared state, ordering, infrastructure, credentials, host …
- Distinctive: line 383
Do not make a failure green with retries, longer arbitrary sleeps, weaker assertions, broader mocks, hidden skips, baseline expansion, or a …
- Distinctive: line 388
Check actual executed test counts and fresh reports.
- Distinctive: line 390
Stop only a verified task-owned process for file locks.
- Very specific: line 394
Keep opt-in environment variables scoped to the test and restore or remove them afterward.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
OpenClaw Windows testing
Use this skill to select and interpret validation for this repository. It covers the Windows node, Companion WinUI app, setup engine, Gateway protocols, WSL integration, packaging, installers, and release artifacts.
It does not authorize app launches, WSL or package changes, remote hosts, CI dispatch, publication, or cleanup. Use test-audit when writing or reviewing tests, proof validation for runtime evidence, Crabbox for authorized remote Windows execution, and native Gateway from source for native Gateway registration or compatibility work.
Start with the changed contract
- Record the repository path, branch, full HEAD, intended base and SHA, ahead/behind counts, and dirty-file count.
- Identify the production owner and its existing tests. Read the applicable architecture guide from AGENTS.md.
- Include staged, unstaged, and relevant untracked paths. A committed-diff-only plan is incomplete for local work.
- Use the classifier as a read-only starting point, then add behavioral proof that path classification cannot infer:
.\scripts\Get-CiChangeClassification.ps1 -EventName pull_request `
-ChangedPaths 'src\OpenClaw.Connection\GatewayConnectionManager.cs' -HumanFor a committed comparison, pass known -BaseSha and -HeadSha values instead
of -ChangedPaths. The classifier selects hosted lanes and the mandatory local
code-change closeout. Its proof-pool output is a candidate inventory, not
authorization or completed evidence.
If the source tree changes while validation is running, the affected result is stale. Rebuild and rerun against the new exact tree.
Use the proportional ladder
Choose the execution target
before any authorized runtime proof. Fixture-covered app behavior stays on the
deterministic fixture. Isolated test builds that need a real native Gateway
default to the task-owned build and named-patch workflow,
including single-instance tests. Build Companion in its own worktree, prepare a
unique patch with a task-owned work root, and select it explicitly with isolated
app data. The launcher's -Isolated switch alone does not isolate a Gateway
build or allocate a unique instance. Use separate VMs for OS/clean-image
isolation or missing host capabilities; keep required real WSL/MXC proof.
Start at the smallest boundary that can fail for the intended regression. Move up when the change crosses another owner, transport, persistence boundary, architecture, or distribution format. Code changes still end with the required closeout even when focused tests pass.
1. Documentation and skill checks
For ordinary documentation-only changes:
.\scripts\validate-docs.ps1
git diff --checkFor changes under .agents\skills, also run:
.\scripts\validate-agent-skills.ps1
.\scripts\test-agent-skills-validator.ps1Do not launch the app or claim runtime behavior from documentation validation.
The shipped winnode skill is an exception: changes to its command contract
also require the CLI/core tests named in
AGENTS.md.
2. Focused owner tests
Use dotnet test <project> --filter '<expression>' for a class or behavior,
then run relevant siblings when shared setup or lifecycle could be involved.
| Owner or risk | Focused project |
| Shared models, Gateway client, MCP, capabilities, approvals, A2UI security | tests\OpenClaw.Shared.Tests\OpenClaw.Shared.Tests.csproj |
| Gateway registry, credentials, connection state, pairing, protocol signatures | tests\OpenClaw.Connection.Tests\OpenClaw.Connection.Tests.csproj |
| Tray state, settings, onboarding helpers, localization, installer source contracts | tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests.csproj |
| Setup pipeline, WSL install policy, rollback, setup-code and provider workflow | tests\OpenClaw.SetupEngine.Tests\OpenClaw.SetupEngine.Tests.csproj |
winnode parsing, JSON output, command descriptions and uninstall flow | tests\OpenClaw.WinNode.Cli.Tests\OpenClaw.WinNode.Cli.Tests.csproj |
| Native WinUI, Reactor, A2UI rendering and accessibility | tests\OpenClaw.Tray.UITests\OpenClaw.Tray.UITests.csproj |
| Functional UI surfaces | tests\OpenClawTray.FunctionalUI.Tests\OpenClawTray.FunctionalUI.Tests.csproj |
| Real-process tray and local MCP | tests\OpenClaw.Tray.IntegrationTests\OpenClaw.Tray.IntegrationTests.csproj |
| Gateway-mediated setup, recovery, pairing and invocation | tests\OpenClaw.E2ETests\OpenClaw.E2ETests.csproj |
Examples:
dotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.Connection.Tests\OpenClaw.Connection.Tests.csproj `
--filter 'FullyQualifiedName~PairingFlowTests'
dotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.SetupEngine.Tests\OpenClaw.SetupEngine.Tests.csproj `
--filter 'FullyQualifiedName~GatewayWizardRestartRecoveryPolicyTests'
$env:OPENCLAW_RUN_INTEGRATION = '1'
try {
dotnet build .\src\OpenClaw.Tray.WinUI\OpenClaw.Tray.WinUI.csproj `
-c Debug -r win-x64
dotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.Tray.IntegrationTests\OpenClaw.Tray.IntegrationTests.csproj `
-r win-x64
} finally {
Remove-Item Env:\OPENCLAW_RUN_INTEGRATION -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
}Use temporary settings directories or set OPENCLAW_TRAY_DATA_DIR before the
test process starts. For real tray/setup proof, also isolate
OPENCLAW_TRAY_APPDATA_DIR and OPENCLAW_TRAY_LOCALAPPDATA_DIR. Do not let
tests read or mutate the normal user profile. Tray Integration launches a real
app process, so it requires runtime authority even though its profile is
isolated. It locates existing tray build output rather than receiving the app
through a project reference, so rebuild the app from the current tree first.
3. Required local closeout for code
Every code change and every agent code-change closeout requires:
$env:OPENCLAW_REPO_ROOT = (Get-Location).Path
.\build.ps1
dotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.Shared.Tests\OpenClaw.Shared.Tests.csproj --no-restore
dotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests.csproj --no-restoreIn a fresh worktree, build each test project first or omit --no-restore on the
first run. A quick successful exit with no executed tests is not a pass. Inspect
the test totals or TRX.
Add the affected owner project even when it is not one of the two required
suites. For winnode, MCP output, or command-reference changes:
dotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.WinNode.Cli.Tests\OpenClaw.WinNode.Cli.Tests.csproj --no-restoreSettings-profile, app-identity, or sandbox-containment changes also need the DevBuild variant used by CI:
dotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests.csproj `
-c Debug -r win-x64 --no-restore -p:DevBuild=true `
--filter 'FullyQualifiedName~SettingsManagerIsolationTests|FullyQualifiedName~AppRefactorContractTests.SandboxPage_'4. WinUI and application-boundary proof
Pure view models and projections belong in focused unit tests. Mounted controls, Windows App SDK behavior, accessibility, keyboard input, and visible rendering need the UI suite or an interactive proof host.
Run the inventory-owned windows-winui-interactive accessibility proof command
with the repository wrapper:
.\scripts\run-proof-tests.ps1 `
-Project 'tests\OpenClaw.Tray.UITests\OpenClaw.Tray.UITests.csproj' `
-Filter 'Category=Accessibility' `
-ResultName 'winui-accessibility' `
-RuntimeIdentifier win-x64This proof launches the real app, requires runtime authority and an available Windows desktop, and emits inventory-bound evidence. CI runs the same accessibility category through its own prebuilt test-lane command.
For deterministic real-app chat and navigation behavior, build the exact app and use the fixture. Runtime regressions require both Debug and production-shaped, non-Dev Release runs:
.\build.ps1
$debugApp = '.\src\OpenClaw.Tray.WinUI\bin\Debug\net10.0-windows10.0.22621.0\win-x64\OpenClaw.Tray.WinUI.exe'
.\scripts\test-gateway-fixture.ps1 -AppPath $debugApp
.\build.ps1 -Project WinUI -Configuration Release
$releaseApp = '.\src\OpenClaw.Tray.WinUI\bin\Release\net10.0-windows10.0.22621.0\win-x64\OpenClaw.Tray.WinUI.exe'
.\scripts\test-gateway-fixture.ps1 `
-AppPath $releaseApp -Configuration Release -ScreenshotsUse win-arm64 on a native ARM64 host. The fixture proves the real app,
Gateway client, chat stack, history loader, local MCP, and mounted native UI
against synthetic loopback data. It does not prove live pairing, providers,
node command execution, WSL, native Gateway/MXC, installation, or update.
For current-head visual, permission, native-input, or diagnostic claims, use the
windows-winui-interactive proof pool and the proof-validation skill. A state
snapshot or UI Automation result alone does not prove unclipped rendered pixels.
5. WSL, pairing, protocol, and node invocation
Connection and pairing changes need focused OpenClaw.Connection.Tests plus the
appropriate real boundary. Setup, bootstrap, WSL lifecycle, revocation, and
network recovery use the E2E project. Local E2E creates a run-scoped WSL distro
and run-specific startup registrations, so it requires runtime authority and
should run only when explicitly needed:
$env:OPENCLAW_RUN_E2E = '1'
try {
dotnet build .\src\OpenClaw.Tray.WinUI\OpenClaw.Tray.WinUI.csproj `
-c Debug -r win-x64
dotnet test .\tests\OpenClaw.E2ETests\OpenClaw.E2ETests.csproj -r win-x64 `
--filter 'FullyQualifiedName~OpenClaw.E2ETests.Setup.SetupAndConnectTests'
} finally {
Remove-Item Env:\OPENCLAW_RUN_E2E -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
}Use RevocationAndRecoveryTests or NetworkRecoveryTests in the filter when
that is the changed contract. These lanes install and exercise the npm-latest
WSL Gateway path. They locate existing tray build output rather than receiving
the app through a project reference, so rebuild it from the current tree first.
They are not native MSIX Gateway proof.
For app-owned WSL installation diagnostics, the non-mutating preflight is:
.\scripts\validate-wsl-gateway.ps1 -Scenario PreflightOnlyUpstreamInstall launches the tray, installs or reuses the shared product
OpenClawGateway distro, and stops matching WSL keepalive processes. Its WSL
state is not isolated by the run-specific AppData directories. It requires
explicit runtime authority and an owned disposable host. FreshMachine and
Recreate additionally unregister OpenClawGateway, require
-ConfirmDestructiveClean, and require explicit destructive authority.
Changes to MXC sandboxing, system.run, approvals, Windows command execution,
or setup/connect behavior affecting MXC require:
.\scripts\validate-mxc-e2e.ps1The script fails skipped MXC proofs by default. -AllowSkip documents an
incapable host only and is not merge validation for MXC-related work.
Every new Windows node command also needs live local MCP discovery and invocation
through winnode, plus the real Gateway path when the command is
Gateway-mediated. Follow
Windows node testing and the
proof skill.
6. Build, architecture, packaging, and installer proof
.\build.ps1 is the normal repository build. Use its project switches for a
smaller development loop, but do not substitute a partial build for required
closeout.
Architecture rules:
dotnet build ... -r win-arm64on x64 is cross-compile sanity only.- Native ARM64 launch, WebView2, runtime loading, UI, and installer behavior
require the
windows-11-arm64proof pool. - Release publish validates both architectures. x64 performs native dependency
load probes. ARM64 release jobs, including the native
windows-11-armpublish, pass-SkipNativeLoadProbe; they prove payload presence and signatures, not native ARM64 dependency loading or app behavior.
Exact development packaging entrypoints:
# Fast local Inno iteration
.\scripts\build-inno-local.ps1 -Arch x64 -Fast
# Both release-shaped Inno architectures
.\scripts\build-inno-local.ps1 -Arch All
# Side-by-side locally signed Dev MSIX
.\scripts\setup-dev-msix-cert.ps1
.\build.ps1 -Project WinUI -Msix Dev
# Unsigned Store submission packages for x64 and ARM64
.\build.ps1 -Project WinUI -Msix StoreCertificate trust and package installation change machine state. Run them only with that authority, and remove a task-created development certificate when the test is complete:
.\scripts\setup-dev-msix-cert.ps1 -RemoveFor source and artifact contract changes, use the matching checks instead of an unrelated app smoke:
| Change | Exact check |
| Inno source or Pascal Script | .\scripts\Test-InstallerScriptCompiles.ps1 -RequireCompiler |
| Installer source contract | .\scripts\run-proof-tests.ps1 -Project 'tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests\OpenClaw.Tray.Tests.csproj' -Filter 'FullyQualifiedName~InstallerIssAssertionTests' -ResultName 'installer-source' |
| Store bundle construction | .\scripts\test-msix-bundle.ps1 |
| MSIX version allocation | .\scripts\test-msix-versioning.ps1 |
| MSIX artifact shape | .\scripts\test-msix-ci-artifacts.ps1 |
| Dev MSIX release asset | .\scripts\test-dev-msix-release.ps1 |
| Migration test package | .\scripts\test-migration-test-msix.ps1 |
| Store submission authorization | .\scripts\test-microsoft-store-submission.ps1 |
| Inno-to-Store helper behavior | .\scripts\test-store-migration-test-script.ps1 |
Source checks do not prove clean install, upgrade, repair, uninstall, signature
reputation, Store ingestion, package-private storage, or preservation. Use
windows-clean-installer-upgrade for exact signed installer/update artifacts,
windows-11-sac-on for enforcing Smart App Control, and the disposable
Store migration procedure for real
Inno-to-Store acceptance.
Repository validation tooling has its own executable contracts:
| Change | Exact checks |
| Proof-pool inventory or scheduling | .\scripts\validate-proof-pools.ps1; .\scripts\test-proof-pool-validator.ps1; .\scripts\test-validate-docs-proof-pool-flow.ps1 |
| Result admission, wrappers, or evidence summaries | .\scripts\test-proof-evidence.ps1 |
| Agent readiness reporting | .\scripts\test-agent-readiness.ps1 |
| Change classifier | .\scripts\test-ci-change-classifier.ps1 |
| CI Gate result admission | .\scripts\test-ci-gate-results.ps1 |
| Workflow contracts | .\scripts\test-ci-workflow-contract.ps1 |
| Native Gateway source-build safety | .\scripts\test-native-gateway-source-build.ps1 |
| npm Gateway channel selection | .\scripts\test-gateway-npm-release.ps1 |
| Packaged Gateway provenance | .\scripts\test-gateway-packaged-release.ps1 |
| MSIX preview source selection | .\scripts\test-msix-preview-source-version.ps1 |
| Daily alpha version selection | .\scripts\test-daily-alpha-version.ps1 |
| Alpha promotion policy and versioning | .\scripts\test-alpha-promotion.ps1; .\scripts\test-alpha-promotion-versioning.ps1 |
| Release branch and stable correction versioning | .\scripts\test-release-branch-versioning.ps1; .\scripts\test-stable-correction-release-validator.ps1 |
The documentation gate runs the proof-pool schema and parent-flow checks, not the full malformed-contract matrix. Run the named focused checks for the contract being changed.
7. Release and cross-repository compatibility
.github\workflows\ci.yml is the source of truth for hosted lanes. It separates:
- fast documentation, skill, classifier, packaging-contract, and release-policy checks
- core, tray/setup/integration, and UI/accessibility test jobs
- WSL setup, revocation, and network E2E shards
- x64 release publish smoke and native ARM64 release publish
- per-architecture Dev/Store MSIX builds and the Store bundle
- signed x64/ARM64 portable and Inno release assets
- the fail-closed CI Gate
Packaging, installer, project, workflow, dependency, classifier, or unknown-path
changes select full pull-request validation and x64 release smoke. Pushes to
main and tags also require ARM64 release publishing.
The reusable .github\workflows\release-candidate-e2e.yml proves one exact
OpenClaw package candidate against an exact Windows-node app and immutable test
harness. Only the recorded outcome passed, backed by the passing selected test,
proves setup, connect, and safe system.which invocation through the real WSL
Gateway. An explicitly allowed protocol_mismatch outcome may make the workflow
green, but it records incompatibility during fixture initialization and is not
behavioral proof. Neither outcome proves the native packaged Gateway. Preserve
candidate, app, workflow, artifact, and digest identities when interpreting it.
Release acceptance can exceed merge validation. Signed installer reputation, Store migration, real distribution, native Gateway lifecycle, native ARM64, and cross-architecture upgrade claims remain blocked until their named proof pools or release gates run against the exact candidate artifacts. Validation never grants permission to reserve versions, sign, publish, submit to the Store, or dispatch workflows.
Failure policy
- Treat a failure as a defect until evidence identifies product, test fixture, shared state, ordering, infrastructure, credentials, host capability, or stale source.
- Reproduce with the smallest owner test or the same CI shard/filter. Fix the cause, rerun the focused failure, then rerun every required closeout command affected by the fix.
- Do not make a failure green with retries, longer arbitrary sleeps, weaker assertions, broader mocks, hidden skips, baseline expansion, or a different provider or architecture.
- A passing replay is not a proven fix. Add or identify a regression that fails for the original defect when feasible.
- Check actual executed test counts and fresh reports. Zero tests, missing or stale TRX, all-skipped selections, and skipped custom proof are failures.
- Stop only a verified task-owned process for file locks. Do not terminate another session's tray, Gateway, WSL distro, service, or installer.
- Diagnose missing prerequisites with
.\scripts\setup-dev.ps1 -CheckOnly. Installation requires authority. - Keep opt-in environment variables scoped to the test and restore or remove
them afterward. In particular, unset
OPENCLAW_RUN_INTEGRATION,OPENCLAW_RUN_E2E, andOPENCLAW_RUN_MXC_E2Ewhen finished. - Report exact commands, pass/fail and executed/skipped counts, source identity, architecture, runtime or artifact identity, and every unrun or blocked proof boundary. Do not turn fixture, local MCP, WSL, unsigned package, or cross-compile evidence into a broader claim.
Source and maintenance
Windows-owned adaptation of the MIT-licensed upstream OpenClaw testing skill. Windows retains mandatory local code closeout, .NET and WinUI suite ownership, WSL/native Gateway separation, package identities, x64/ARM64 gates, named proof pools, and repository publication boundaries.
Trending
Less talk lately.about the whole repository
Who's talking about openclaw/openclaw-windows-node
- microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml“Code generator generates warnings on obsolete class with CreateFromString attributes”GitHub · Oct 24, 2025 · 7 reactions
- openclaw/openclaw“feat: expose session classification facts”GitHub · Jul 13, 2026 · 2 reactions
- @ragnarheil.de“#MSBUILD Highlight: A Windows companion suite for #OpenClaw - the AI-powered personal assistant. Made with …”Bluesky · Jun 2, 2026 · 2 likes
- A Hacker News story“OpenClaw Windows Hub”Hacker News · Jun 2, 2026 · 2 points
- openclaw/openclaw“fix(copilot): discover models with usable saved sign-ins”GitHub · Oct 27, 2026 · 1 reactions
The biggest 5 of 21 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 21
Talked about on GitHub, Bluesky and Hacker News (21 times).
On GitHub · 17
- Oct 24, 2025Code generator generates warnings on obsolete class with CreateFromString attributes — microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml7 reactions · 1 comment
- Jul 13, 2026feat: expose session classification facts — openclaw/openclaw2 reactions · 8 comments
- Oct 27, 2026fix(copilot): discover models with usable saved sign-ins — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 2 comments
- Oct 15, 2026feat: notify Windows monitoring after Gateway package publication — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 9 comments
- Oct 14, 2026feat(gateway): share localized welcome content with native clients — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 9 comments
12 more on GitHub
- Oct 14, 2026fix: acknowledge slow Gateway starts without failing setup — openclaw/openclaw-windows-packaging1 reaction · 2 comments
- Oct 13, 2026fix: keep chat usable after removing an unavailable tool server — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 6 comments
- Oct 10, 2026[Feature]: Track official MXC v1 adoption across Core, Windows Node and native Gateway packaging — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 1 comment
- Oct 7, 2026fix: preserve isolated capability in clawctl error responses — openclaw/openclaw-windows-packaging1 reaction · 4 comments
- Sep 8, 2026Windows node approval replay rejects with possible prepared-plan sessionKey inconsistency — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 5 comments
- Aug 28, 2026Define the Companion and Gateway lifecycle contract — openclaw/openclaw-windows-packaging1 reaction · 3 comments
- Aug 5, 2026feat(release): validate Windows-node releases and main — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 35 comments
- Jul 31, 2026fix(protocol): preserve gateway session attribution across node runs — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 67 comments
- Jul 18, 2026[Bug]: Gateway RPC wizard inherits CLI process and service lifecycle — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 2 comments
- Jul 13, 2026Maintainer application: requesting contribution triage/maintenance path — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 1 comment
- Jun 4, 2026Add screen_snapshot action (parity with screen_record) to avoid base64 context bloat — openclaw/openclaw1 reaction · 1 comment
- Jun 3, 2026clawsweeper re-review fails for repos with default branch of 'master' instead of 'main' — openclaw/clawsweeper1 reaction · 2 comments
On Bluesky · 3
- Jun 2, 2026#MSBUILD Highlight: A Windows companion suite for #OpenClaw - the AI-powered personal assistant. Made with 🦞 love by Scott Hanselman and… — @ragnarheil.de2 likes and reposts
- Jun 3, 2026Microsoft anuncia la app oficial de OpenClaw. Permite al agente controlar tu Windows: ✓ Permisos integrados ✓ Control total desde la… — @midu.dev1 likes and repost · 1 reply
- Jun 4, 2026🚀 Skyrocketing! 🚀 (200+ new stars) 📦 openclaw / openclaw-windows-node ⭐ 1,161 (+331) 🗒 C# Windows companion suite for OpenClaw - System… — @github-trending.bsky.social0 likes and reposts · 1 reply
On Hacker News · 1
- Jun 2, 2026OpenClaw Windows Hub2 points
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- shanselman/openclaw-windows-hub★ 2.2k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- steipete/warelay★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 394ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- friuns2/openclaw-android-assistant★ 573same name
- OpenClawAndroid/openclaw-android-assistant★ 556same name
- bighamx/openclaw-android-node-apk★ 59same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use auto-qa, discord-e2e and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
supermansuper563-opsSkillauto-qa
Continuously audit, live-test, and stress-test the current OpenClaw codebase across at least ten independently scoped subsystem lanes; default to 100 independently verified, landed root-cause fixes, maintain an evidence-backed report, and announce each merged pull request immediately. Use for OpenClaw-wide autonomous QA, live-provider campaigns, gateway, CLI, web, plugin, native-app, scenario, packaging, and extended soak testing.
Also in 11 projects that use this
molt-botSkilldiscord-e2e
Test Discord with Convex-leased QA bots: check credentials without a Gateway, exercise owned messages, or prove OpenClaw replies, files, threads, reactions, streaming, and typing. Distinguish API and Gateway evidence from manual user interactions.
Also in 10 projects that use this
molt-botSkillopenclaw-repair-sweep
Run scoped OpenClaw issue/PR repair campaigns: coordinate workers, prove root causes, and land or close verified work under the requested authority.
Also in 10 projects that use this
steipeteSkillplugin-sdk-impact
Count Plugin SDK consumers across live ClawHub releases and bundled OpenClaw plugins before deprecation, removal, or behavior changes; supports public release-date filters.
Also in 6 projects that use this
salalaslamSkillproof-video
Make a short MP4 that replays an agent coding session with real command outputs, to show a team that a bug is or isn't fixed, how quickly something can be fixed, or how to work a problem through with an AI agent. Use when asked for a proof video, walkthrough video, demo of how the agent would fix it, or a video to post on a ticket or PR.
Also in 10 projects that use this
hkyutongSkillnode-connect
Diagnose OpenClaw node connection and pairing failures for Android, iOS, and macOS companion apps. Use when QR/setup code/manual connect fails, local Wi-Fi works but VPS/tailnet does not, or errors mention pairing required, unauthorized, bootstrap token invalid or expired, gateway.bind, gateway.remote.url, Tailscale, or plugins.entries.device-pair.config.publicUrl.
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +2 more from molt-bot
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- autoreviewSkill
- crabboxSkill
- global-repo-triageSkill
- hanselman-code-reviewSkill
- native-gateway-from-sourceSkill
- openclaw-debuggingSkill
- openclaw-proof-validationSkill
- pr-simplifySkill
- technical-documentationSkill
- test-auditSkill
- uninstallSkill
- windows-app-mcpSkill
- windows-pr-prepareSkill
- winnodeSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

