bootstrap-feature
Skill277 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when adding a new CLI subcommand or feature to openboot. Walks through the canonical pattern: cobra command registration, runner wiring, archtest awareness, and test placement. Trigger when the user says "add a command", "new subcommand", "implement feature X for the CLI", or starts editing under internal/cli/.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Koroqe/claude-code-sdlctheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Koroqe/claude-code-sdlc★ 52same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architecture-reviewSkill
- ship-prSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 63
If your feature shells out, use the Runner pattern so L1 tests can fake subprocess calls.
- Very specific: line 97
Default to faked-runner L1 unless the thing you're testing only exists when a real brew/git/npm is on the path — then add an integration …
- Distinctive: line 108
If archtest fails with a new violation, fix the code rather than baselining — the baseline is for *intentional* exceptions and they require …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Bootstrap a new openboot feature
This skill gives the canonical recipe for adding a new CLI command or feature to openboot without violating project invariants.
Step 1 — Where the code goes
| Kind of thing | Location |
| New CLI subcommand | internal/cli/<verb>.go, register in internal/cli/root.go init() |
| Subprocess call (any binary) | internal/system.RunCommand / RunCommandSilent — do not call exec.Command directly |
| HTTP call (any URL) | internal/httputil.Do — handles 429 + Retry-After |
Path under ~ | os.UserHomeDir() — never os.Getenv("HOME"), never hardcode ~ |
| User-visible output | internal/ui.* helpers — never raw fmt.Println |
| Destructive action | guarded by cfg.DryRun check |
| Error returned to caller | wrapped: fmt.Errorf("context: %w", err) |
These are enforced (or planned) by internal/archtest. The rule that
covers each invariant is listed in AGENTS.md.
Step 2 — Cobra command skeleton
// internal/cli/myverb.go
package cli
import "github.com/spf13/cobra"
func newMyVerbCmd() *cobra.Command {
var flag string
cmd := &cobra.Command{
Use: "myverb [arg]",
Short: "One-line description",
Long: "Longer description if useful.",
Args: cobra.ExactArgs(1),
RunE: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error {
return runMyVerb(cmd.Context(), args[0], flag)
},
}
cmd.Flags().StringVar(&flag, "flag", "", "Description of the flag")
return cmd
}Register it in internal/cli/root.go:
rootCmd.AddCommand(newMyVerbCmd())Step 3 — Runner interface for testability
If your feature shells out, use the Runner pattern so L1 tests can fake
subprocess calls. Example from internal/brew/runner.go:
type Runner interface {
Output(args ...string) ([]byte, error)
CombinedOutput(args ...string) ([]byte, error)
// ...
}
// realRunner uses exec.Command — this file is in execAllowedPaths.
type realRunner struct{}
func New() *Brew { return &Brew{r: &realRunner{}} }Then in tests:
type fakeRunner struct { ... }
func (f *fakeRunner) Output(args ...string) ([]byte, error) { ... }This is the pattern that lets the fake-runner half of L1 stay fast and hermetic.
Step 4 — Test placement
| Scope | Tier | Build tag | Where |
| Pure logic + fakes | L1 | none | <pkg>/<feature>_test.go |
| Real subprocess in temp dir | L1 | none | test/integration/<feature>_integration_test.go |
| Compiled binary, no installs | L3 | e2e | test/e2e/... |
| Real installs on macOS | L4 (VM) | e2e,vm | test/e2e/... |
Default to faked-runner L1 unless the thing you're testing only exists when a real
brew/git/npm is on the path — then add an integration test under test/integration/
(no build tag; it runs as part of L1).
Step 5 — Verify before committing
go vet ./...
make test-unit # ~75s, includes archtest + integrationIf archtest fails with a new violation, fix the code rather than baselining — the baseline is for intentional exceptions and they require justification in the commit message.
Step 6 — Conventional commit
feat: add openboot myverb command for X
One thing per commit. If you also fixed an unrelated bug along the way, split it into a separate commit.
Common mistakes
- Calling
exec.Commandfrom the feature file — refactor throughinternal/systemor add a Runner. archtest will catch this. - Skipping
cfg.DryRuncheck — destructive ops must be a no-op under--dry-run. Print "[DRY-RUN] Would X" instead of doing X. - Hardcoding
~/— alwaysos.UserHomeDir()thenfilepath.Join. - Raw
fmt.Println— useui.Info,ui.Success,ui.Warn,ui.Error. - Forgetting to register the command in
root.go— cobra silently does nothing ifAddCommandis missed.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

