issue-triage
Skill826 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
This project skill defines a systematic workflow to harvest, categorize, cluster, and prioritize open issues in the `open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto` repository.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 49 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Do not force specific helper modules.
- Very specific: line 13
Use the provided harvest_issues.py script if python is available.
- Distinctive: line 16
Local File System: If a local data backup exists, parse it directly using standard library parsers.
- Very specific: line 53
Check the repository root context for a ROADMAP.md or .github/ROADMAP.md manifest if available.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 49 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Step-by-Step Triage Instructions
Phase 1: Tool-Agnostic Harvesting
- Goal: Download all open issues into a unified JSON dataset (
.agents/triage/open_issues.json) to serve as the single source of truth. - Agent Guidelines:
- Do not force specific helper modules. Harvest using whatever interface is active:
- Use the provided
harvest_issues.pyscript if python is available. - GitHub CLI:
gh issue list --state open --limit 100 --json number,title,body,labels,comments,createdAt,updatedAt,author - GitHub REST/GraphQL API: Query the endpoint directly, filtering by state = open.
- Local File System: If a local data backup exists, parse it directly using standard library parsers.
- Using the Github MCP tool
- Use the provided
- Mandatory dataset properties: Issue number, title, body markdown, tags/labels, comments count, creation date, and author username.
- Do not force specific helper modules. Harvest using whatever interface is active:
Phase 2: Semantic Similarity Clustering
- Goal: Scan the active dataset to detect duplicates, tracking epics, and overlapping problem clusters.
- Target Convergence Clusters:
- Cluster A: Profiles Serialization & Merging: Group feedback on the experimental profiling signal spec (e.g. issues concerning
ProfilesDictionaryoptimization, global vs resource-level dictionaries, attribute units reinvention, sample length validation). - Cluster B: Bazel, Build, & BCR Publishing: Group build integration issues (e.g. broken Bazel Central Registry tagging releases, lack of version identification in archives, Renovate dashboards).
- Cluster C: OTLP Transport, Responses, & Retries: Group network recovery feedback (e.g. OTLP/HTTP failure decoding crashes, infinite Retry-After loops, log partial-success indexes).
- Cluster A: Profiles Serialization & Merging: Group feedback on the experimental profiling signal spec (e.g. issues concerning
Phase 3: Multidimensional Categorization Schema
- Goal: Map every harvested issue precisely along three independent technical axes:
| Classification Axis | Permitted Categories | Mapping Rules |
| 1. Telemetry Signal | Traces, Metrics, Logs, Profiles, Common | Map to Common if it concerns general protocol features (attributes, failure formats, retries) sharing multiple signal types. |
| 2. Technical Area | Core Protocol/Schema, Build Systems & CI/CD, Documentation & Examples, Ecosystem Integration | Map to Core Protocol if it targets .proto file declarations, and Build Systems if it concerns compilers, make files, or module packaging. |
| 3. Issue Nature | Bug Fix, Enhancement, Specification Clarification, Chore/Cleanup, Invalid | Map to Clarification if it targets documentation ambiguities or TODO items, and Invalid if it is spam. |
Phase 4: Strategic Theme Synthesis (Signal Insulation)
- Goal: Synthesize individual categories into unified epic initiatives.
- Agent Guideline:
- Insulate Profiling Spec Work: The experimental Profiles signal spec is under active development by a dedicated Special Interest Group (SIG). Keep all Profiling issues bundled under a single tracking track to prevent experimental layout details from bleeding into stable telemetry signals (Traces, Metrics, Logs).
Phase 5: Dynamic Roadmap Prioritization Engine
- Goal: Score, sort, and prioritize categorized themes and issues dynamically on the fly, avoiding hardcoded mappings. Priorities MUST be drawn from live ecosystem states.
Ecosystem Priority Discovery & Search Pathways
AI agents MUST dynamically harvest priority milestones at runtime:
- Local Repository Audit:
- Check the repository root context for a
ROADMAP.mdor.github/ROADMAP.mdmanifest if available.
- Check the repository root context for a
- Global Community Registry Query:
- Query the central standard open-source repository
open-telemetry/communityon GitHub:- Pull and parse the live central project roadmap from
roadmap.mdon the main branch (served raw athttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/open-telemetry/community/main/roadmap.md). - Query and index active GitHub Projects or Milestones inside
open-telemetry/communityrepository if available.
- Pull and parse the live central project roadmap from
- Query the central standard open-source repository
- Execution Safety Rule:
- Since GitHub API file fetching tools (such as
get_file_contentsorsearch_code) may return file metadata rather than inline string content, or can place downloaded files outside the workspace search path, the agent MUST fallback to a direct Python programmatic fetch (viaurllib.request) if local workspace searches forroadmap.mdreturn empty.
- Since GitHub API file fetching tools (such as
Dynamic Semantic Reconciliation Rules
Audit the categorized themes and issues against the fetched community priorities (e.g. OTel central P0, P1, P2 tiers):
- OTel P0: Existing Artifacts Maintenance & Stabilizations:
- Mapping target: Direct priority targets to issues affecting baseline build stability, core dependency upgrades, tagging workflows (Bazel/BCR/VERSION), and multi-architecture compiler runner bugs blocking Collector/SDK developers.
- OTel P1: Core Reliability (OTLP Logs, Transport & Semantic conventions):
- Mapping target: Direct priority targets to critical transport recovers (HTTP failure body decoding crashes, Retry-After lockups, Logs partial success indexes).
- OTel P2: New Capabilities & Subsystems (Profiling SIG, Client/RUM):
- Mapping target: Direct priority targets to experimental signal specification blocks (Profiles signal dictionary merges, sample mapping arrays) or browser/client performance improvements.
- OTel Backlog (Dynamic logging, CI/CD signals):
- Mapping target: Defer to lowest priority category; prioritize minor doc Hugo edits or legacy TODO comment cleanups.
Prioritized Roadmap Matrix Generation
Output the finalized prioritized roadmap matrix sorted dynamically by these live mapped categories: OTel P0 (P1 Local), OTel P1 (P2 Local), OTel P2 (P3 Local), and OTel Backlog (P4 Local).
The matrix MUST be delivered to the ISSUE_TRIAGE.md file.
Other versions61 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 61
- denoland/deno★ 109ksame name
- modelcontextprotocol/servers★ 92ksame name
- rtk-ai/rtk★ 85ksame name
- rustfs/rustfs★ 36ksame name
- dotnet/maui★ 23ksame name
- ImranR98/Obtainium★ 21ksame name
- dotnet/runtime★ 18ksame name
- ComposioHQ/awesome-codex-skills★ 17ksame name
- composio-community/awesome-codex-skills★ 16ksame name
- Arize-ai/phoenix★ 12ksame name
51 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use meeting-notes-and-actions, pr-review-ci-fix and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ComposioHQSkillmeeting-notes-and-actions
Turn meeting transcripts or rough notes into crisp summaries with decisions, risks, and owner-tagged action items; use for Zoom/Meet/Teams transcripts, call notes, or long meeting chats to generate share-ready outputs.
Also in 4 projects that use this
ComposioHQSkillpr-review-ci-fix
Automated PR review and CI auto-fix for GitHub and GitLab using the Composio CLI. Pulls diffs, fetches failing job logs, posts review comments, and loops fix commits until checks go green.
Also in 4 projects that use this
FlorianBruniauxSkilltdd-rust
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillphoenix-cli
Debug LLM applications using the Phoenix CLI. Fetch traces, analyze errors, structure trace review with open coding and axial coding, inspect datasets, review experiments, query annotation configs, and use the GraphQL API. Use whenever the user is analyzing traces or spans, investigating LLM/agent failures, deciding what to do after instrumenting an app, building failure taxonomies, choosing what evals to write, or asking "what's going wrong", "what kinds of mistakes", or "where do I focus" — even without naming a technique.
Also in 3 projects that use this
petestewartSkilldatadog-logs
Query Datadog logs via the Logs Search API v2. Use when the user asks to "check the logs", "search logs", "find errors in Datadog", "look up logs for", "show me production logs", "check for errors", "search Datadog", or any request involving log search, error investigation, or production debugging that requires Datadog log data.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from ComposioHQ
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

