agentleFS
omeirhaegheomeirhaeghe/staffgent/skills/prd-writing/SKILL.md

prd-writing

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write a crisp PRD / one-pager for a product initiative.

16 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use feedback-synthesis, onboarding-flow and 2 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Dragoon0xSkill

    feedback-synthesis

    Turn raw customer feedback from multiple sources into clear product insights and priorities. Covers feedback collection, pattern recognition, and separating signal from noise. Use when feedback feels overwhelming, contradictory, or when the team can't agree on what users actually want.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Dragoon0xSkill

    onboarding-flow

    Design first-run experiences that create the aha moment fast. Reduces time-to-value by sequencing actions, progressive disclosure, and contextual guidance. Use when building signup flows, product tours, or empty states.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    git-workflow

    Squad branching model: dev-first workflow with insiders preview channel

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Dragoon0x

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every goal has a metric; every metric has a number.

    line 29
  2. Very specific:

    After drafting, move the ledger item to the right stage (usually define) and tell your manager what you produced and the top open question.

    line 33

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

PRD writing

Produce a tight, decision-oriented PRD. Favor clarity over length — a strong one-pager beats a vague ten-pager. Use start_draft to save it and link it to the ledger item.

Structure (drop sections that don't apply, never pad):

  1. Title & one-liner — what this is, in a sentence.
  2. Problem — the user/business problem and evidence it's real. Who hurts, how often, how much.
  3. Goals & non-goals — what success looks like; what's explicitly out of scope.
  4. Users & use cases — primary persona(s) and the top jobs-to-be-done.
  5. Proposed solution — the approach at a conceptual level. Include the key flows; note alternatives considered and why not.
  6. Success metrics — the 1–3 KPIs that will tell us this worked (see the kpi-definition skill). Include a target and a guardrail metric.
  7. Scope & milestones — phased: an MVP that proves the core bet, then fast-follows.
  8. Risks & open questions — the assumptions that, if wrong, sink this; and what you'd do to de-risk them (ties to the prove stage).
  9. Dependencies — teams, data, or systems you need.

Quality bar:

  • Every goal has a metric; every metric has a number.
  • The MVP is genuinely minimal and maps to the riskiest assumption.
  • A reader can tell in 30 seconds what we're building and why it matters.

After drafting, move the ledger item to the right stage (usually define) and tell your manager what you produced and the top open question.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.