agentleFS
oliverweissloliverweissl/context-garden/skills/compost/SKILL.md

compost

Skill4 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run long or repetitive commands (builds, pytest/ctest, SLURM jobs, solver logs) through a clustering summarizer instead of reading raw output; re-runs show only what changed. Use for output likely over ~100 lines or fix-test-fix loops.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. Leebonggu/slop-compost★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the summary, not the raw log.

    line 26
  2. Very specific:

    Only if the summary is insufficient, use the printed retrieval_handles (get <id> --lines A:B, event <id> --event N, grep <id> '<pattern>', …

    line 29

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

compost

!"${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/bin/compost" mode --banner

Agents that do not expand the line above (e.g. Codex): run <this-skill-dir>/bin/compost mode --banner first and follow it.

Offline, deterministic: output is parsed and clustered by script (no LLM); the full raw output is always kept on disk. Skip it for short output -- just read that directly.

compost is not on PATH: always use the full <this-skill-dir>/bin/compost path (or python3 <this-skill-dir>/scripts/compost.py if executables are not permitted).

  1. Run: <this-skill-dir>/bin/compost run -- <command...> (pipes/redirects need bash -c '...'). Prints the root error (first error in user code), secondary failure groups with counts, warnings, numerical summary, and a raw_output_id.
  2. Read the summary, not the raw log.
  3. Re-run the same command the same way: only new/resolved errors and count deltas are printed ("No structural changes." if none).
  4. Only if the summary is insufficient, use the printed retrieval_handles (get <id> --lines A:B, event <id> --event N, grep <id> '<pattern>', show <id> --json). They never re-run the command; they read the already-stored raw output.
  5. Existing log file: bin/compost ingest --file <path> (or --stdin).
  6. The plugin's Bash hook may deny a raw build/test command and name the compost command to run instead: run that. Need raw output (e.g. to show the user)? Append # raw to the command.

Profiles (auto-detected, --profile to override): pytest, ctest, gcc/clang, cmake, python_traceback, slurm, numerical_solver, generic.

Output fields, statuses, storage and retention: references/schema.md. Per-profile detection: references/profiles.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.