agentleFS
oaslanankaoaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro/skills/wired-subcircuit-design/SKILL.md

wired-subcircuit-design

Skill169 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub

Build a genuinely wired, showcase-grade KiCad schematic with KiCad MCP Pro — wired sub-circuit islands plus a tidy label bus — instead of the correct-but-plain by-name-label output of auto layout.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when an agent must produce a schematic that *looks* like a person drew it — wired functional blocks, conventional power, a …

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Plan: all coordinates from get_pin_positions.

    line 68
  3. Very specific:

    Guard with ERC: Run run_erc. Fix every violation before judging looks — a blank/oddly-passing ERC means KiCad isn't reading your symbols …

    line 70
  4. Very specific:

    Prefer the label bus over routed nets wires (unsafe_routed_wires=True can short by crossing geometry — avoid it).

    line 89

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Wired Sub-circuit Design Skill

Use this skill when an agent must produce a schematic that looks like a person drew it — wired functional blocks, conventional power, a clean breakout bus — not just an electrically valid netlist. It is the deliberate, higher-effort path that sch_build_circuit(auto_layout=True, nets=...) cannot reach.

Specific to oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro. Keep in sync with docs/tools-reference.generated.md. Worked reference: examples/gallery/esp32-c3-wroom-02-breakout.

Why auto layout is not enough

sch_build_circuit with nets uses a collision-safe terminal strategy: every pin endpoint gets a stub plus a same-named global label / power symbol, so nets connect by name and can never short by crossing geometry. That is correct and ERC-clean, but it reads as a machine netlist: every decoupling cap floats between its own +3V3 and GND labels instead of being wired. Showcase quality needs explicit placement and wires. The cosmetic score never measures this — judge the render, not the number.

The one rule that avoids a blank sheet

Build the whole sheet in a single sch_build_circuit pass with explicit symbols (with coordinates), wires, labels and power_symbols — and no nets, no auto_layout. Do not assemble a schematic from scratch with repeated sch_add_symbol calls: a freshly seeded sheet has no root UUID that the reader round-trips, so each incremental add stamps a different instance path and KiCad renders a blank sheet even though the file parses. One pass writes one consistent root UUID, so every symbol lands on the root sheet.

Compute exact pin coordinates up front with get_pin_positions(lib, sym, x, y, rot) (pure geometry — no placement needed), then wire pin-tip to pin-tip.

Design pattern

  1. Anchor the main part (MCU / module) in the center.
  2. Wire the sub-circuit islands. Decoupling, reset, boot-strap, status LED, regulators — draw each as a real wired block ending in power symbols. This is what separates a showcase from auto output; do not let these become floating labelled pins.
  3. Label bus for the breakout. Route general IO to a header with matched local labels. Generate the part-side and header-side labels from one source list so the two label sets are identical by construction — this eliminates the whole isolated_pin_label / label_dangling class, not just the ones you happen to see.
  4. Conventional power. +3V3 up, GND down; put exactly one PWR_FLAG on each supply net so ERC sees the rails driven.
  5. Place each sub-circuit in its own x-column below the anchor, and keep decoupling clear of the anchor's stub fan — most first-pass ERC errors (multiple_net_names) come from a power symbol landing on a neighbouring label.
  6. Fill the title block with sch_set_title_block_info.

Attach labels correctly

A net label must sit on a wire endpoint. When tapping a sub-circuit node, add a short stub wire and place the label at the stub's free end — a label floating beside a wire raises label_dangling.

The loop

  1. Plan all coordinates from get_pin_positions; assemble the four lists.
  2. Build in one sch_build_circuit pass.
  3. Guard with ERC. Run run_erc. Fix every violation before judging looks — a blank/oddly-passing ERC means KiCad isn't reading your symbols (see the root UUID rule).
  4. See. Render with sch_render_png (or kicad-cli sch export svg) and judge against the rubric below. The render is ground truth.
  5. Refine placement for overlaps and composition; rebuild. Stop when ERC is clean and nothing overlaps — do not chase the cosmetic score past that.

Rubric — what "wired showcase" looks like

  • Functional blocks are wired, not floating labelled pins.
  • Power symbols are conventional; one PWR_FLAG per supply.
  • The breakout bus is tidy and every label is matched (no isolated labels).
  • Orthogonal wiring, on-grid, no diagonal runs, no overlapping graphics.
  • Complete title block; content composed rather than crammed in one corner.

Guardrails

  • Wired ≠ correct-by-magic. Finish with run_erc; a showcase must also be clean.
  • Prefer the label bus over routed nets wires (unsafe_routed_wires=True can short by crossing geometry — avoid it).
  • One curated example is worth more than a bulk auto-generated gallery; expect per-example effort.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.