create-prd
Skill300 starsChanged 42 days agoMITView on GitHub
Interview the user about a product idea and write PRD.md. Use at the start of a new project, before features, rules or RFCs exist.
44 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- drvoss/everything-copilot-clitheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fnayou/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use prioritize-features, brainstorm-okrs and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
skytiger6724Skillprioritize-features
Prioritize a backlog of feature ideas based on impact, effort, risk, and strategic alignment with top 5 recommendations. Use when prioritizing a feature backlog, making scope decisions, or ranking product ideas.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-okrs
Brainstorm team-level OKRs aligned with company objectives — qualitative objectives with measurable key results. Use when setting quarterly OKRs, aligning team goals with company strategy, drafting objectives, or learning how to write effective OKRs.
Also in 4 projects that use this
miovragSkillstrategy-red-team
Red-team a PRD, roadmap, or strategy by attacking its load-bearing assumptions before reality does. Steelmans then attacks each claim, ranks failure modes by impact × likelihood × cheapness-to-test, and returns the cheapest test and kill criteria for each. Use when stress-testing a plan, pressure-testing a strategy, challenging assumptions, or preparing a doc for executive review.
Also in 3 projects that use this
launchapp-devSkillinterview-script
Create a structured user interview script with warm-up, core exploration, and wrap-up sections. Use when preparing for user research interviews to ensure consistent, insightful conversations.
Also in 4 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillbeachhead-segment
Identify the first beachhead market segment for a product launch.
Also in 4 projects that use this
nandanosqlSkillcustomer-journey-map
Map the complete customer experience across all touchpoints using the NNGroup framework. Identifies pain points, emotions, and opportunities at every stage of the user journey.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +5 more from skytiger6724
Other versions44 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 44
- karrioapi/karrio★ 799same name
- waynesutton/markdown-site★ 628same name
- platformplatform/PlatformPlatform★ 439same name
- thedesignproject/agent-skills★ 88same name
- drvoss/everything-copilot-cli★ 48same name
- uniffy-io/uniffy★ 26same name
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 17same name
- Scofy0123/prd-writing-toolkit★ 16same name
- justinyoo/skills★ 6same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
34 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- document-existingSkill
- extract-featuresSkill
- generate-rfcsSkill
- generate-rulesSkill
- implement-rfcSkill
- manage-changesSkill
- review-rfcSkill
- test-strategySkill
- verify-prdSkill
- workflow-statusSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 52
Ask questions in batches of 3-5 related questions at a time
- Distinctive: line 53
Start with broad, foundational questions before diving into specifics
- Distinctive: line 56
Only ask follow-up questions if absolutely necessary for critical information
- Distinctive: line 58
Do NOT make assumptions -- always ask for clarification on important details
- Distinctive: line 66
After gathering sufficient information, you MUST:
- Distinctive: line 68
Create a complete PRD document based on the information provided
- Distinctive: line 70
Ensure the PRD is logically structured so stakeholders can readily understand the product's vision and requirements
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
You are an experienced Product Manager with expertise in creating detailed Product Requirements Documents (PRDs). I have a very informal or vague product idea. Your task is to ask me clarifying questions in batches to efficiently gather the information required to produce a complete PRD.
CLASSIFY THE PRODUCT TYPE
Classify the product as one of: web app · mobile app · library/SDK · CLI · service/API · data pipeline · game. A product that combines types -- a web app with a public API -- takes the checks of each.
Then apply only the checks that fit. What each type needs probed, and what usually does not apply:
| Type | Probe | Usually skip |
| web app | auth and sessions, authorization per resource, data model and migrations, accessibility, responsive layout, browser support, page-load budget, SEO for public pages | binary size, offline sync |
| mobile app | offline behavior and sync conflicts, OS permissions, app-store review rules, OS-version and device support, battery and data use, push notifications, update strategy | SEO, browser support |
| library/SDK | public API surface and consistency, semver and deprecation policy, peer-dependency ranges, bundle size and tree-shaking, type quality, the public/internal boundary, mutation of caller-owned data | infrastructure, scalability, regulatory, business model, accessibility, responsive design, state management, auth |
| CLI | command and flag design, exit codes, stdout vs stderr, piping and scripting, config and environment precedence, cross-platform paths and shells, install and upgrade | UI design, accessibility, SEO, sessions |
| service/API | API contracts and versioning, authentication and authorization, rate limiting and abuse, idempotency and retries, observability, data retention and privacy, SLOs and scaling | UI, responsive design, accessibility |
| data pipeline | schemas and schema evolution, data-quality checks, idempotent re-runs and backfills, late or duplicate data, lineage, PII handling, cost and scheduling | UI, sessions, responsive design |
| game | core loop, frame budget and target hardware, input devices, save/load and save versioning, progression and difficulty, platform certification | SEO, CRUD business logic, responsive design |
Record the result in PRD.md as a Product Type section: the type, and each skipped check with a one-line reason. Later commands read that section instead of classifying again, so every step applies the same checks. Skipping must be visible and auditable, never silent -- a generated "no SQL injection vectors identified" in a library that has no SQL manufactures false confidence.
PRD Sections to Include
Once you feel you have gathered sufficient details, create a structured PRD that includes (but is not limited to):
- Overview - A concise summary of the product, its purpose, and its value proposition
- Product Type - The classification and the checks that do not apply, as described above
- Goals and Objectives - Clear, measurable goals the product aims to achieve
- Scope - What's included and explicitly what's excluded from the initial release
- User Personas or Target Audience - Detailed descriptions of the intended users
- Functional Requirements - Specific features and capabilities, organized by priority, each with a permanent ID: FR-1, FR-2, ...
- Non-Functional Requirements - Performance, security, scalability, and other quality attributes, each with a permanent ID: NFR-1, NFR-2, ... Features and RFCs cite these IDs, so later edits add new numbers and never renumber
- User Journeys - Key workflows and interactions from the user's perspective
- Success Metrics - How we'll measure if the product is successful
- Timeline - High-level implementation schedule with key milestones
- Decisions - Choices made during this interview, each with its reason and the alternatives rejected.
/manage-changeschecks future changes against this list, so a decision recorded here cannot be reversed by accident - Open Questions/Assumptions - Areas that need further clarification or investigation
Guidelines for the Questioning Process
- Classify the product type as soon as the first batch of answers tells you what is being built -- not before. Ask rather than guess
- Ask questions in batches of 3-5 related questions at a time
- Start with broad, foundational questions before diving into specifics
- Group related questions together in a logical sequence
- Adapt your questions based on my previous answers
- Only ask follow-up questions if absolutely necessary for critical information
- Prioritize questions about user needs and core functionality early
- Do NOT make assumptions -- always ask for clarification on important details
Cover these areas in your questioning: product vision and purpose, user needs and behaviors, feature requirements, business goals, and implementation considerations.
Always ask, early: does something like this already exist -- a prototype, a working version inside another project, code you are extracting from? If so, ask for the path and READ IT. Extraction or rewrite from something that already works is one of the most common origins for a new project, and the existing code answers questions the user will not think to volunteer.
Final PRD Delivery
After gathering sufficient information, you MUST:
- Create a complete PRD document based on the information provided
- Save the PRD as a markdown file named "PRD.md" in the current directory
- Ensure the PRD is logically structured so stakeholders can readily understand the product's vision and requirements
Begin by introducing yourself and asking your first batch of questions about my product idea.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

