task-requirement-intake
Skill2 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when execution discovers requirements. Route TODOs.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- compact-directory-memorySkill
- task-archaeologySkill
- task-artifact-integritySkill
- task-aware-project-workSkill
- task-context-storageSkill
- task-cross-machine-syncSkill
- task-external-repos-patternSkill
- task-frameworkSkill
- task-lifecycle-disciplineSkill
- task-lifecycle-edge-casesSkill
- task-lifecycle-portabilitySkill
- task-nested-subtask-lifecycleSkill
- task-root-git-operationsSkill
- task-timestamp-conventionSkill
- task-trackerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Add a row to the parent's TODO table with all of:
- Very specific: line 32
Use ../task-framework/scripts/todo_lifecycle.py to update rows.
- Distinctive: line 37
Run classification at intake, post-flight, and every phase transition:
- Very specific: line 54
When an L1 worker returns, L0 performs one reconciliation before selecting more work.
- Distinctive: line 68
Only dependency-ready items may be routed.
- Very specific: line 76
Before completing the parent task, call todo_lifecycle.validate_todos().
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Task Requirement Intake
This skill owns the TASK.md ## TODO lifecycle. A TODO is an
undecomposed requirement discovered during execution, not a checklist phase.
Intake it before deciding how it affects the current task.
Record
Add a row to the parent's TODO table with all of:
- stable row ID;
- requirement text;
- source (phase, post-flight, user, review, or other evidence);
- local timestamp;
- status (
open,decomposed,routed,cancelled, orblocked); - scope decision (
open,continuous,nested,top-level,cancelled, orblocked); - outcome/reference (checklist phase, child task path, independent task path, cancellation reason, or blocker).
Use ../task-framework/scripts/todo_lifecycle.py to update rows. Do not
silently turn a TODO into a completed checklist item or omit it from TASK.md.
Classification points
Run classification at intake, post-flight, and every phase transition:
- continuous — progressive/continuous with existing checklist work.
Append or refine checklist phases. Mark
decomposedand record the phases. - nested — strongly related but independently lifecycle-deliverable and
not fully overlapping the parent. Create a first-class child through
manage_task.py create <name> --parent <parent>. Markroutedand record the child path/hash. - top-level — unrelated to the parent. Create an independent top-level
task with the normal lifecycle. Mark
routedand record its path/hash.
A TODO reaches a terminal state only when decomposed into checklist work,
routed to a nested/top-level task, explicitly cancelled, or explicitly blocked
with a reason. open means unresolved and prevents claiming the task complete.
Continuation loop (optional, for orchestrated L1 execution)
When an L1 worker returns, L0 performs one reconciliation before selecting
more work. Pass a stable result_id and any newly discovered requirements to
todo_lifecycle.reconcile_return() (or task_api.py reconcile). The function
records the result ID, so retries return IDEMPOTENT and never duplicate TODO
rows, checklist phases, or routes.
The returned outcome is explicit:
CONTINUE— route list contains newly classified continuous/nested/top-level work;CONTINUE_WAITING— TODOs exist but their declareddepends_onphases are not ready;COMPLETE— no open TODO remains and no route is pending;HARD_BLOCK— the worker reported a genuine blocker or decision boundary;IDEMPOTENT— this result was already reconciled.
Only dependency-ready items may be routed. Continuous work is appended to the
current checklist; nested and top-level items are handed to their respective
task lifecycle. A missing safe default, destructive action, or hard tool block
must stop the loop rather than trigger an automatic dispatch. Continue invoking
the same protocol after each returned L1 result until COMPLETE or
HARD_BLOCK; never spin without a new result.
Before completing the parent task, call todo_lifecycle.validate_todos().
The task API exposes todos and todo_validation_errors; TASKS.md displays
TODO status and outcomes separately from checklist progress.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

