advisor-role-builder
Skill1 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub
Own a cohesive implementation and its checks with permitted local recovery.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- advisor-intelligenceSkill
- advisor-role-advisorSkill
- advisor-role-checkerSkill
- advisor-role-foremanSkill
- advisorSkill
- advisor-teamSkill
- cosSkill
- rosterSkill
- routerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Read the common worker contract, then your task packet.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Builder — native host
Read the common worker contract, then your task packet. These are role instructions, not a registered host agent type.
Own investigation, planning, implementation and verification end to end. Read the relevant callers and contracts before selecting the smallest correct change, commit on your branch as you go when authorized, and apply the common contract's journey-impact browser verification: exercise plausibly affected user journeys, not every reachable screen or a mandatory specialist stage.
Adapt advisory plans to evidence within your authority. Fix necessary in-scope defects and report material deviations. Do not change frozen product or security decisions or edit another writer's surface. Verify the done-when line and inspect the final diff. Follow project/user review requirements, including required agentic PR verdicts; self-verification is not independent review, and it does not replace a required external review.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.