agentleFS
noteditnotedit/happy-skills/skills/dev/feature-pipeline/SKILL.md

feature-pipeline

Skill340 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Execute implementation tasks from design documents using markdown checkboxes. Use when (1) implementing features from feature-analyzer output, (2) resuming interrupted work, (3) batch executing tasks. Triggers on 'start implementation', 'run tasks', 'resume'.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If blocked, mark as failed and continue

    line 69

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Feature Pipeline

Execute implementation tasks directly from design documents. Tasks are managed as markdown checkboxes - no separate session files needed.

Quick Reference

# Get next task
python3 scripts/task_manager.py next --file <design.md>

# Mark task completed
python3 scripts/task_manager.py done --file <design.md> --task "Task Title"

# Mark task failed
python3 scripts/task_manager.py fail --file <design.md> --task "Task Title" --reason "..."

# Show status
python3 scripts/task_manager.py status --file <design.md>

Task Format

Tasks are written as markdown checkboxes in the design document:

## Implementation Tasks

- [ ] **Create User model** `priority:1` `phase:model`
  - files: src/models/user.py, tests/models/test_user.py
  - [ ] User model has email and password_hash fields
  - [ ] Email validation implemented
  - [ ] Password hashing uses bcrypt

- [ ] **Implement JWT utils** `priority:2` `phase:model`
  - files: src/utils/jwt.py
  - [ ] generate_token() creates valid JWT
  - [ ] verify_token() validates JWT

- [ ] **Create auth API** `priority:3` `phase:api` `deps:Create User model,Implement JWT utils`
  - files: src/api/auth.py
  - [ ] POST /register endpoint
  - [ ] POST /login endpoint

See references/task-format.md for full format specification.

Execution Loop

LOOP until no tasks remain:
  1. GET next task (task_manager.py next)
  2. READ task details (files, criteria)
  3. IMPLEMENT the task
  4. VERIFY acceptance criteria
  5. UPDATE status (task_manager.py done/fail)
  6. CONTINUE

Unattended Mode Rules

  • NO stopping for questions
  • NO asking for clarification
  • Make autonomous decisions based on codebase patterns
  • If blocked, mark as failed and continue

Status Updates

Completed task:

- [x] **Create User model** `priority:1` `phase:model` ✅
  - files: src/models/user.py
  - [x] User model has email field
  - [x] Password hashing implemented

Failed task:

- [x] **Create User model** `priority:1` `phase:model` ❌
  - files: src/models/user.py
  - [ ] User model has email field
  - reason: Missing database configuration

Resume / Recovery

To resume interrupted work, simply run again with the same design file:

/feature-pipeline docs/designs/xxx.md

The task manager will find the first uncompleted task and continue from there.

Integration

This skill is typically triggered after /feature-analyzer completes:

User: /feature-analyzer implement user auth

Claude: [designs feature, generates task list]
        Design saved to docs/designs/2026-01-02-user-auth.md
        Ready to start implementation?

User: Yes / 开始实现

Claude: [executes tasks via feature-pipeline]

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.