feature-dev
Skill339 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Guided feature development with codebase understanding and architecture focus. Use for implementing features systematically: explore → clarify → design → implement → test → review.
21 other projects use a version of this, 6 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- euxx/claude-skills-for-copilotedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- bhoon716/skill-forgetheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- z2014/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- maxg-agency/claude-code-setuptheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- waybarrios/opencode-power-packedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- HorizonRobotics/RoboOrchardLabtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use code-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 6 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- notedit/happy-skills★ 340100% same
Edited · 6
- LedgerHQ/ledger-live★ 62767% same
- waybarrios/opencode-power-pack★ 54715% same
- euxx/claude-skills-for-copilot★ 442% same
- neronain/ClaudeSkills-Neronain★ 395% same
- huminglong/my_claude_skills★ 112% same
- juancguerrerodev/WDK-SKILL★ 095% same
Wrote their own version · 14
- Ohh-889/skyroc-admin★ 795same name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow★ 192same name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harness★ 192same name
- HorizonRobotics/RoboOrchardLab★ 180same name
- bhoon716/skill-forge★ 4same name
- z2014/skills★ 3same name
- alex-voloshin-dev/ai-skills★ 2same name
- maxg-agency/claude-code-setup★ 2same name
- thoitiettxl-cyber/Claw-II★ 2same name
- IAbuElRuzz/AgentSkills★ 1same name
4 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- feature-analyzerSkill
- feature-pipelineSkill
- issue-flowSkill
- screenshot-analyzerSkill
- cover-imageSkill
- skill-creation-guideSkill
- tts-skillSkill
- gsap-animationSkill
- react-animationSkill
- spring-animationSkill
- video-producerSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. 0 are common, 20 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
20
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Understand before acting: Read and comprehend existing code patterns first
- Distinctive: line 16
Read files identified by agents: When launching agents, ask them to return lists of the most important files to read.
- Distinctive: line 18
Test thoroughly: Ensure all new code has appropriate test coverage
- Distinctive: line 30
Create todo list with all phases
- Distinctive: line 31
If feature unclear, ask user for:
- Distinctive: line 72
If the user says "whatever you think is best", provide your recommendation and get explicit confirmation.
- Distinctive: line 95
Wait for explicit user approval
- Distinctive: line 96
Read all relevant files identified in previous phases
- Distinctive: line 98
Follow codebase conventions strictly
- Distinctive: line 99
Write clean, well-documented code
- Distinctive: line 100
Update todos as you progress
- Distinctive: line 106
Goal: Ensure comprehensive test coverage and all tests pass
- Distinctive: line 114
Test cases with full implementation code
- Distinctive: line 124
Write the approved test cases following project conventions
- Distinctive: line 126
Ensure tests are well-organized and maintainable
- Distinctive: line 134
If tests fail due to implementation bugs, fix the implementation
- Distinctive: line 135
If tests fail due to test issues, fix the tests
- Distinctive: line 145
Goal: Ensure code is simple, DRY, elegant, easy to read, and functionally correct
- Distinctive: line 152
If significant changes were made, re-run tests using test-runner agent to ensure nothing broke
- Distinctive: line 158
Goal: Document what was accomplished
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Feature Development
You are helping a developer implement a new feature. Follow a systematic approach: understand the codebase deeply, identify and ask about all underspecified details, design elegant architectures, implement, test thoroughly, then review.
Announce at start: "I'm using the feature-dev skill to implement this feature."
Core Principles
- Ask clarifying questions: Identify all ambiguities, edge cases, and underspecified behaviors. Ask specific, concrete questions rather than making assumptions. Wait for user answers before proceeding with implementation. Ask questions early (after understanding the codebase, before designing architecture).
- Understand before acting: Read and comprehend existing code patterns first
- Read files identified by agents: When launching agents, ask them to return lists of the most important files to read. After agents complete, read those files to build detailed context before proceeding.
- Simple and elegant: Prioritize readable, maintainable, architecturally sound code
- Test thoroughly: Ensure all new code has appropriate test coverage
- Use TodoWrite: Track all progress throughout
Phase 1: Discovery
Goal: Understand what needs to be built
Initial request: $ARGUMENTS
Actions:
- Create todo list with all phases
- If feature unclear, ask user for:
- What problem are they solving?
- What should the feature do?
- Any constraints or requirements?
- Summarize understanding and confirm with user
Phase 2: Codebase Exploration
Goal: Understand relevant existing code and patterns at both high and low levels
Actions:
Launch 2-3 code-explorer agents in parallel. Each agent should:
- Trace through the code comprehensively and focus on getting a comprehensive understanding of abstractions, architecture and flow of control
- Target a different aspect of the codebase (eg. similar features, high level understanding, architectural understanding, user experience, etc)
- Include a list of 5-10 key files to read
Example agent prompts:
- "Find features similar to [feature] and trace through their implementation comprehensively"
- "Map the architecture and abstractions for [feature area], tracing through the code comprehensively"
- "Analyze the current implementation of [existing feature/area], tracing through the code comprehensively"
- "Identify UI patterns, testing approaches, or extension points relevant to [feature]"
- Once the agents return, please read all files identified by agents to build deep understanding
- Present comprehensive summary of findings and patterns discovered
Phase 3: Clarifying Questions
Goal: Fill in gaps and resolve all ambiguities before designing
CRITICAL: This is one of the most important phases. DO NOT SKIP.
Actions:
- Review the codebase findings and original feature request
- Identify underspecified aspects: edge cases, error handling, integration points, scope boundaries, design preferences, backward compatibility, performance needs
- Present all questions to the user in a clear, organized list
- Wait for answers before proceeding to architecture design
If the user says "whatever you think is best", provide your recommendation and get explicit confirmation.
Phase 4: Architecture Design
Goal: Design multiple implementation approaches with different trade-offs
Actions:
- Launch 2-3 code-architect agents in parallel with different focuses: minimal changes (smallest change, maximum reuse), clean architecture (maintainability, elegant abstractions), or pragmatic balance (speed + quality)
- Review all approaches and form your opinion on which fits best for this specific task (consider: small fix vs large feature, urgency, complexity, team context)
- Present to user: brief summary of each approach, trade-offs comparison, your recommendation with reasoning, concrete implementation differences
- Ask user which approach they prefer
Phase 5: Implementation
Goal: Build the feature
DO NOT START WITHOUT USER APPROVAL
Actions:
- Wait for explicit user approval
- Read all relevant files identified in previous phases
- Implement following chosen architecture
- Follow codebase conventions strictly
- Write clean, well-documented code
- Update todos as you progress
Phase 6: Automated Testing
Goal: Ensure comprehensive test coverage and all tests pass
Actions:
Generate Tests: Launch 2 test-generator agents in parallel with different focuses:
- Unit tests: Focus on individual functions, edge cases, error handling
- Integration tests: Focus on component interactions, data flow, API contracts
Each agent should analyze the new code and provide:
- Test cases with full implementation code
- Priority ranking (critical/important/nice-to-have)
- Required mocks and fixtures
- Review Generated Tests:
- Consolidate test recommendations from both agents
- Prioritize critical tests that must be implemented
- Present test plan to user for approval
- Implement Tests:
- Write the approved test cases following project conventions
- Set up required mocks and test fixtures
- Ensure tests are well-organized and maintainable
- Run Tests: Launch test-runner agent to:
- Execute the full test suite (or relevant subset)
- Analyze any failures with root cause diagnosis
- Provide specific fixes for failing tests
- Fix and Iterate:
- If tests fail due to implementation bugs, fix the implementation
- If tests fail due to test issues, fix the tests
- Re-run tests until all pass
- Do not proceed to Quality Review until all tests pass
- Report Coverage: Summarize test coverage achieved and any gaps
Phase 7: Quality Review
Goal: Ensure code is simple, DRY, elegant, easy to read, and functionally correct
Actions:
- Launch 3 code-reviewer agents in parallel with different focuses: simplicity/DRY/elegance, bugs/functional correctness, project conventions/abstractions
- Consolidate findings and identify highest severity issues that you recommend fixing
- Present findings to user and ask what they want to do (fix now, fix later, or proceed as-is)
- Address issues based on user decision
- If significant changes were made, re-run tests using test-runner agent to ensure nothing broke
Phase 8: Summary
Goal: Document what was accomplished
Actions:
- Mark all todos complete
- Summarize:
- What was built
- Key decisions made
- Files modified
- Test coverage achieved
- Suggested next steps
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

