agentleFS
nobodyohm-webnobodyohm-web/Thot/skills/productivity/session-librarian/SKILL.md

session-librarian

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Organize sessions by prompt: find, rename, archive, prune.

4 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Prefer archive (reversible soft-hide) over delete/prune.

    line 67
  2. Very specific:

    Always run destructive commands with --dry-run first and show the output, then re-run with --yes after confirmation.

    line 68
  3. Very specific:

    Before deleting anything with meaningful content, offer hermes sessions export --format md as a backup.

    line 70
  4. Very specific:

    Titles are identity for /resume <title>: When renaming, keep titles short, unique, and prefix-friendly.

    line 93
  5. Very specific:

    After a cleanup pass, re-run the discovery query and hermes sessions list to confirm the library reflects the plan (keepers present with …

    line 103

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Session Librarian

Manage the user's session library conversationally: find past sessions about a topic, summarize what they decided, rename them meaningfully, split work into parallel sessions, and propose stale ones for archive or deletion — all from a plain-language request like "find my sessions about Q3 pricing, keep the useful ones, and clean up the duplicates."

Inspired by Perplexity Computer's prompt-driven session management (Aug 2026): the agent starts, organizes, and cleans up the user's own session library, and always shows the plan before touching anything.

When to Use

  • "What sessions do I have about X?" / "What did we decide about X?"
  • "Rename these sessions to something meaningful."
  • "Clean up my session library" / "archive the stale ones."
  • "Fork that session into a follow-up focused on Y."
  • "Split this into one session per ticket" (see Parallel workstreams below).

The Two Surfaces

TaskSurface
Find sessions by topic, read content, summarize decisionssession_search tool (FTS5 over the message store)
List/filter by metadata (age, source, cost, tokens, workspace)hermes sessions list / stats via terminal
Renamehermes sessions rename <session_id> <title...>
Bulk soft-hide (reversible)hermes sessions archive <filters>
Delete (destructive)hermes sessions delete / hermes sessions prune <filters>
Export before deleting anything valuablehermes sessions export --session-id <id> --format md
Continue work in a new place/branch (fork current session) or start a fresh session and cite the summary

Procedure

① Discover. Use session_search(query=..., limit=5-10) with topic keywords; vary phrasing (feature name, symptom, project name). For metadata sweeps ("sessions older than 60 days from telegram"), use hermes sessions list --source telegram --limit 50 instead.

② Summarize per session. The discovery result's bookend_start (goal), match window, and bookend_end (resolution) usually suffice — only dump a full session (session_search(session_id=...)) when the user asks for decisions in depth. Report each as: link (@session: form) — one-line goal — one-line outcome.

③ Plan before acting (MANDATORY for anything that mutates). Present a plan table first: which sessions get renamed to what, which get archived, which are proposed for deletion and why (duplicate of which keeper, stale, empty). Wait for the user's go-ahead. Exception: a single rename the user explicitly dictated can be done directly.

④ Act with the safest primitive.

  • Prefer archive (reversible soft-hide) over delete/prune.
  • Always run destructive commands with --dry-run first and show the output, then re-run with --yes after confirmation.
  • Before deleting anything with meaningful content, offer hermes sessions export --format md as a backup.

⑤ Report. Renames applied, sessions archived (count + how to undo: archived sessions remain in the DB and are listed with --include-archived), anything exported, anything skipped and why.

Parallel Workstreams

For "one session per ticket, investigate each, report back": do NOT try to drive other live sessions. Use delegate_task with one task per workstream — each subagent runs in its own session automatically — then synthesize their summaries. Mention that each delegation's transcript is itself searchable later via session_search.

Pitfalls

  • Never delete without a dry-run + explicit confirmation in this conversation. A standing "clean things up" is authority to propose, not to prune.
  • session_search finds content, not metadata. Age/cost/source filters live in the CLI; combine both when the request mixes them ("old sessions about pricing").
  • Titles are identity for /resume <title>. When renaming, keep titles short, unique, and prefix-friendly; warn the user if a rename collides with an existing title.
  • Archived ≠ deleted. Archive hides sessions from default listings only. Say which one you did.
  • Cross-profile session links (@session:<profile>/<id>) are read-only from another profile; management commands act on the current profile's DB.

Verification

After a cleanup pass, re-run the discovery query and hermes sessions list to confirm the library reflects the plan (keepers present with new titles, archived ones gone from the default listing).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.