dispatch
Skill0 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Routes golf analytics requests to the right 2-3 skills. Load this FIRST when a golf data or betting-analytics request comes in and you are unsure which skills to activate. Prevents loading all 16 skills when only 2-3 are needed. Do not use when the request clearly names one skill's job, such as devigging a price -- load odds-analysis directly.
40 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- renzrollon/interlocktheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- dan-myles/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- bestony/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AcKeskin/contexturetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- mhlaghari/stuntmantheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vu1n/pillboxtheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use orchestrate, spec and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
varun29ankuSSkillorchestrate
This skill should be used when the user asks to 'orchestrate a task', 'break down work into parallel agents', 'coordinate subtasks', 'run agents in parallel', or mentions 'multi-agent'. Decomposes complex tasks into tracked subtasks, dispatches parallel subagents, and coordinates until completion.
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkillspec
Produce a verified spec — problem, desired outcome, and acceptance criteria — before building. Use when given a GitHub/Linear issue link, when starting from a fuzzy in-conversation idea, or asked to "figure out what to do" / "scope this" / "what should I build" — whenever the *what* isn't yet pinned down. Grills the ambiguities, checks the premise against the code, and produces acceptance criteria you sign off on — then hands to design-first.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 6 projects that use this
Other versions40 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 40
- your-papa/obsidian-Smart2Brain★ 1.3ksame name
- s2b-dev/smart-second-brain★ 1.3ksame name
- bassimeledath/dispatch★ 411same name
- renzrollon/interlock★ 61same name
- fagemx/edda★ 36same name
- phj128/autoworker★ 18same name
- clonable-eden/cekernel★ 17same name
- mhlaghari/stuntman★ 16same name
- YippeeXuXu/dsh-collab-mode★ 5same name
- BigY0shi/super-skills★ 4same name
30 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- backtestingSkill
- birdieapi-toolSkill
- course-fitSkill
- edge-detectionSkill
- feature-engineeringSkill
- hole-scoringSkill
- odds-analysisSkill
- odds-explorerSkill
- outright-modelSkill
- player-scoutingSkill
- probability-calibrationSkill
- strokes-vs-fieldSkill
- tournament-lookupSkill
- tournament-previewSkill
- walk-forward-validationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 38 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 95
Do not name a pick without the caveats from outright-model
- Very specific: line 120
Before a multi-call plan, add up the credits from birdieapi-tool and tell the user.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 38 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill Dispatch Guide
Match the request to a pattern below, load those skills, and stop. Always load birdieapi-tool alongside any skill that needs live data.
Scope check first
BirdieAPI covers the PGA Tour, LPGA, LIV, DP World Tour and Korn Ferry Tour as historical and next-morning data. The only odds are the winner prices of the four men's majors. If the user wants live scores, tee times, weather, round or matchup odds, top-10 markets or each-way terms, say it is not in the data and offer the nearest thing that is.
First-use persona detection
| Signal | Persona | Start With |
| "Who won last week?" / "What is on this week?" | Explorer | tournament-lookup |
| "How is Scheffler playing?" | Scout | player-scouting + strokes-vs-field |
| "Who should I back at the Masters?" | Outright bettor | tournament-preview + odds-explorer |
| "Build me a model of who wins" | Builder | outright-model + feature-engineering |
| "Is my model any good?" | Validator | walk-forward-validation + probability-calibration |
| "What does a +2000 price mean?" | New bettor | odds-analysis |
Request patterns -> skills
"Who won?" / "Results of the 2024 Masters" / "What is on this week?"
tournament-lookupbirdieapi-tool:list_tournaments,get_schedule,get_leaderboard
"Tell me about Rory McIlroy" / "Compare Scheffler and Schauffele"
player-scoutingstrokes-vs-fieldif the user wants form or ratings
"Who is playing best?" / "What is a rating of 2.0?" / "Field-strength adjusted"
strokes-vs-fieldbirdieapi-tool:get_ratings,get_player_results
"Who is best on par 5s?" / "Which holes play hardest?" / "Birdie rate"
hole-scoringcourse-fitif a specific course is involved
"Who plays well at Augusta?" / "Course history" / "Course fit"
course-fithole-scoringfor the hole-level view of the course
"Preview the PGA Championship" / "Who are the contenders?"
tournament-previewodds-explorerfor the market sidecourse-fitif there is time and the credit budget
"What are the odds?" / "Which book has the best price on Scheffler?" / "How did the price move?"
odds-explorerodds-analysisfor implied probability and devigging
"Devig this" / "What is 2000 worth as a probability?" / "Overround"
odds-analysis
"Build a winner-probability model" / "Simulate the Open"
outright-modelfeature-engineeringfor inputswalk-forward-validationbefore trusting any output
"Walk-forward" / "Is k-fold okay?" / "Leakage"
walk-forward-validationfeature-engineering
"Are my probabilities calibrated?" / "Brier" / "Log loss"
probability-calibration
"Is there an edge?" / "Kelly" / "EV on a longshot"
edge-detection(needs a model probability; if none, route tooutright-model)odds-explorerfor the priceprobability-calibrationto check the probability first
"Backtest" / "Has this worked in past majors?" / "Track my bets"
backtestingbirdieapi-tool:get_winner_odds
"How do I call this?" / "What does it cost?" / "Which tool?"
birdieapi-tool
"How does the LPGA / LIV / DP World Tour / Korn Ferry work here?"
birdieapi-toolfor theleagueargument and what each tour holdstournament-lookuporstrokes-vs-fieldfor the actual question- Remember: no hole-by-hole outside the PGA Tour and Korn Ferry Tour, no odds outside the four men's majors
"Who will win the [major]?"
tournament-previewfor the pictureoutright-modelfor probabilities with a sensitivity rangeodds-explorerfor the market, thenodds-analysisto devig it- Do not name a pick without the caveats from
outright-model
Common chains
| Goal | Chain |
| Preview a major | tournament-lookup -> course-fit -> tournament-preview -> odds-explorer |
| Build and test a model | feature-engineering -> outright-model -> walk-forward-validation -> probability-calibration |
| Decide whether a price is value | odds-explorer -> odds-analysis -> outright-model -> edge-detection |
| Test a betting rule | odds-explorer -> backtesting -> walk-forward-validation |
Things the data cannot answer
Say this first, then route to the nearest skill:
| Request | Not in the data | Nearest skill |
| Live scores, tee times, weather | Next-morning data only | tournament-lookup for the finished rounds |
| Strokes gained off the tee, approach, putting | No shot data | hole-scoring, strokes-vs-field |
| Round, matchup or top-10 odds | Only major winner prices | odds-explorer |
| Each-way terms | Not held | odds-analysis for the outright |
| LIV team standings | Individual results only | tournament-lookup |
Credit-aware routing
Before a multi-call plan, add up the credits from birdieapi-tool and tell the user. A preview is about 40 to 60 credits. A backtest across every major in the odds archive is one get_winner_odds call per major (5 credits each) plus the leaderboards (2 each).
When NOT to Use This Guide
Single-skill requests do not need dispatch. "Devig +450 / +900 / +1200" goes straight to odds-analysis.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

