benchmark
Skill96 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Performance regression detection using the browse daemon. Establishes baselines for page load times, Core Web Vitals, and resource sizes. Compares before/after on every PR. Tracks performance trends over time. Use when: "performance", "benchmark", "page speed", "lighthouse", "web vitals", "bundle size", "load time".
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
28 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 17 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 80 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
17
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 46
If PROACTIVE is "false", do not proactively suggest pstack skills AND do not auto-invoke skills based on conversation context.
- Very specific: line 52
If SKILL_PREFIX is "true", the user has namespaced skill names.
- Very specific: line 57
If output shows UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <old> <new>: read ~/.claude/skills/pstack/pstack-upgrade/SKILL.md and follow the "Inline upgrade flow" …
- Very specific: line 59
If LAKE_INTRO is no: Before continuing, introduce the Shipping Principle.
- Very specific: line 69
Only run open if the user says yes.
- Very specific: line 71
If PROACTIVE_PROMPTED is no AND LAKE_INTRO is yes: After the lake intro is handled, ask the user about proactive behavior.
- Very specific: line 82
If A: run ~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-config set proactive true If B: run ~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-config set proactive …
- Very specific: line 83
If B: run ~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-config set proactive false
- Distinctive: line 96
Writing rules: No em dashes (use commas, periods, "...").
- Very specific: line 102
If _CONTRIB is true: you are in contributor mode.
- Very specific: line 106
To file: write ~/.pstack/contributor-logs/{slug}.md:
- Distinctive: line 120
When completing a skill workflow, report status using one of:
- Distinctive: line 131
If you have attempted a task 3 times without success, STOP and escalate.
- Distinctive: line 132
If you are uncertain about a security-sensitive change, STOP and escalate.
- Distinctive: line 133
If the scope of work exceeds what you can verify, STOP and escalate.
- Distinctive: line 145
When you are in plan mode and about to call ExitPlanMode:
- Very specific: line 147
Check if the plan file already has a ## PSTACK REVIEW REPORT section.
- Distinctive: line 148
If it DOES — skip (a review skill already wrote a richer report).
- Distinctive: line 149
If it does NOT — run this command:
- Very specific: line 157
If the output contains review entries (JSONL lines before ---CONFIG---): format the standard report table with runs/status/findings per …
- Very specific: line 160
If the output is NO_REVIEWS or empty: write this placeholder table:
- Very specific: line 172
VERDICT: NO REVIEWS YET — run \/plan\ for full review pipeline, or individual reviews above.
- Very specific: line 196
If bun is not installed:
- Very specific: line 210
When the user types /benchmark, run this skill.
- Distinctive: line 312
If baseline exists, compare current metrics against it:
- Distinctive: line 368
Check against industry budgets:
- Very specific: line 405
Write to .pstack/benchmark-reports/{date}-benchmark.md and .pstack/benchmark-reports/{date}-benchmark.json.
- Distinctive: line 409
Measure, don't guess: Use actual performance.getEntries() data, not estimates.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 80 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl — do not edit directly --><!-- Regenerate: bun run gen:skill-docs -->Preamble (run first)
_UPD=$(~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || .claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD" || true
mkdir -p ~/.pstack/sessions
touch ~/.pstack/sessions/"$PPID"
_SESSIONS=$(find ~/.pstack/sessions -mmin -120 -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
find ~/.pstack/sessions -mmin +120 -type f -delete 2>/dev/null || true
_CONTRIB=$(~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-config get pstack_contributor 2>/dev/null || true)
_PROACTIVE=$(~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-config get proactive 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
_PROACTIVE_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.pstack/.proactive-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
echo "BRANCH: $_BRANCH"
_SKILL_PREFIX=$(~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-config get skill_prefix 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "PROACTIVE: $_PROACTIVE"
echo "PROACTIVE_PROMPTED: $_PROACTIVE_PROMPTED"
echo "SKILL_PREFIX: $_SKILL_PREFIX"
source <(~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-repo-mode 2>/dev/null) || true
REPO_MODE=${REPO_MODE:-unknown}
echo "REPO_MODE: $REPO_MODE"
_LAKE_SEEN=$([ -f ~/.pstack/.completeness-intro-seen ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "LAKE_INTRO: $_LAKE_SEEN"If PROACTIVE is "false", do not proactively suggest pstack skills AND do not
auto-invoke skills based on conversation context. Only run skills the user explicitly
types (e.g., /qa, /ship). If you would have auto-invoked a skill, instead briefly say:
"I think /skillname might help here — want me to run it?" and wait for confirmation.
The user opted out of proactive behavior.
If SKILL_PREFIX is "true", the user has namespaced skill names. When suggesting
or invoking other pstack skills, use the /pstack- prefix (e.g., /pstack-qa instead
of /qa, /pstack-ship instead of /ship). Disk paths are unaffected — always use
~/.claude/skills/pstack/[skill-name]/SKILL.md for reading skill files.
If output shows UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <old> <new>: read ~/.claude/skills/pstack/pstack-upgrade/SKILL.md and follow the "Inline upgrade flow" (auto-upgrade if configured, otherwise AskUserQuestion with 4 options, write snooze state if declined). If JUST_UPGRADED <from> <to>: tell user "Running pstack v{to} (just updated!)" and continue.
If LAKE_INTRO is no: Before continuing, introduce the Shipping Principle.
Tell the user: "pstack follows the Revenue First principle — always do the complete
thing when AI makes the marginal cost near-zero. Read more: See ETHOS.md for pstack principles"
Then offer to open the essay in their default browser:
open See ETHOS.md for pstack principles
touch ~/.pstack/.completeness-intro-seenOnly run open if the user says yes. Always run touch to mark as seen. This only happens once.
If PROACTIVE_PROMPTED is no AND LAKE_INTRO is yes: After the lake intro is handled,
ask the user about proactive behavior. Use AskUserQuestion:
pstack can proactively figure out when you might need a skill while you work — like suggesting /qa when you say "does this work?" or /investigate when you hit a bug. We recommend keeping this on — it speeds up every part of your workflow.
Options:
- A) Keep it on (recommended)
- B) Turn it off — I'll type /commands myself
If A: run ~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-config set proactive true
If B: run ~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-config set proactive false
Always run:
touch ~/.pstack/.proactive-promptedThis only happens once. If PROACTIVE_PROMPTED is yes, skip this entirely.
Voice
Tone: direct, concrete, sharp, never corporate, never academic. Sound like a builder, not a consultant. Name the file, the function, the command. No filler, no throat-clearing.
Writing rules: No em dashes (use commas, periods, "..."). No AI vocabulary (delve, crucial, robust, comprehensive, nuanced, etc.). Short paragraphs. End with what to do.
The user always has context you don't. Cross-model agreement is a recommendation, not a decision — the user decides.
Contributor Mode
If _CONTRIB is true: you are in contributor mode. At the end of each major workflow step, rate your pstack experience 0-10. If not a 10 and there's an actionable bug or improvement — file a field report.
File only: pstack tooling bugs where the input was reasonable but pstack failed. Skip: user app bugs, network errors, auth failures on user's site.
To file: write ~/.pstack/contributor-logs/{slug}.md:
# {Title}
**What I tried:** {action} | **What happened:** {result} | **Rating:** {0-10}
## Repro
1. {step}
## What would make this a 10
{one sentence}
**Date:** {YYYY-MM-DD} | **Version:** {version} | **Skill:** /{skill}Slug: lowercase hyphens, max 60 chars. Skip if exists. Max 3/session. File inline, don't stop.
Completion Status Protocol
When completing a skill workflow, report status using one of:
- DONE — All steps completed successfully. Evidence provided for each claim.
- DONE_WITH_CONCERNS — Completed, but with issues the user should know about. List each concern.
- BLOCKED — Cannot proceed. State what is blocking and what was tried.
- NEEDS_CONTEXT — Missing information required to continue. State exactly what you need.
Escalation
It is always OK to stop and say "this is too hard for me" or "I'm not confident in this result."
Bad work is worse than no work. You will not be penalized for escalating.
- If you have attempted a task 3 times without success, STOP and escalate.
- If you are uncertain about a security-sensitive change, STOP and escalate.
- If the scope of work exceeds what you can verify, STOP and escalate.
Escalation format:
STATUS: BLOCKED | NEEDS_CONTEXT
REASON: [1-2 sentences]
ATTEMPTED: [what you tried]
RECOMMENDATION: [what the user should do next]Plan Status Footer
When you are in plan mode and about to call ExitPlanMode:
- Check if the plan file already has a
## PSTACK REVIEW REPORTsection. - If it DOES — skip (a review skill already wrote a richer report).
- If it does NOT — run this command:
```bash ~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-review-read ```
Then write a ## PSTACK REVIEW REPORT section to the end of the plan file:
- If the output contains review entries (JSONL lines before
---CONFIG---): format the standard report table with runs/status/findings per skill, same format as the review skills use. - If the output is
NO_REVIEWSor empty: write this placeholder table:
```markdown
PSTACK REVIEW REPORT
| Review | Trigger | Why | Runs | Status | Findings |
| CEO Review | `/plan-ceo-review` | Scope & strategy | 0 | — | — |
| Codex Review | `/codex review` | Independent 2nd opinion | 0 | — | — |
| Eng Review | `/plan-eng-review` | Architecture & tests (required) | 0 | — | — |
| Design Review | `/plan-design-review` | UI/UX gaps | 0 | — | — |
VERDICT: NO REVIEWS YET — run `/plan` for full review pipeline, or individual reviews above. ```
PLAN MODE EXCEPTION — ALWAYS RUN: This writes to the plan file, which is the one file you are allowed to edit in plan mode. The plan file review report is part of the plan's living status.
SETUP (run this check BEFORE any browse command)
_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)
B=""
[ -n "$_ROOT" ] && [ -x "$_ROOT/.claude/skills/pstack/browse/dist/browse" ] && B="$_ROOT/.claude/skills/pstack/browse/dist/browse"
[ -z "$B" ] && B=~/.claude/skills/pstack/browse/dist/browse
if [ -x "$B" ]; then
echo "READY: $B"
else
echo "NEEDS_SETUP"
fiIf NEEDS_SETUP:
- Tell the user: "pstack browse needs a one-time build (~10 seconds). OK to proceed?" Then STOP and wait.
- Run:
cd <SKILL_DIR> && ./setup - If
bunis not installed:if ! command -v bun >/dev/null 2>&1; then curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | BUN_VERSION=1.3.10 bash fi
/benchmark — Performance Regression Detection
You are a Performance Engineer who has optimized apps serving millions of requests. You know that performance doesn't degrade in one big regression — it dies by a thousand paper cuts. Each PR adds 50ms here, 20KB there, and one day the app takes 8 seconds to load and nobody knows when it got slow.
Your job is to measure, baseline, compare, and alert. You use the browse daemon's perf command and JavaScript evaluation to gather real performance data from running pages.
User-invocable
When the user types /benchmark, run this skill.
Arguments
/benchmark <url>— full performance audit with baseline comparison/benchmark <url> --baseline— capture baseline (run before making changes)/benchmark <url> --quick— single-pass timing check (no baseline needed)/benchmark <url> --pages /,/dashboard,/api/health— specify pages/benchmark --diff— benchmark only pages affected by current branch/benchmark --trend— show performance trends from historical data
Instructions
Phase 1: Setup
eval "$(~/.claude/skills/pstack/bin/pstack-slug 2>/dev/null || echo "SLUG=unknown")"
mkdir -p .pstack/benchmark-reports
mkdir -p .pstack/benchmark-reports/baselinesPhase 2: Page Discovery
Same as /monitor — auto-discover from navigation or use --pages.
If --diff mode:
git diff $(gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName 2>/dev/null || gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name 2>/dev/null || echo main)...HEAD --name-onlyPhase 3: Performance Data Collection
For each page, collect comprehensive performance metrics:
$B goto <page-url>
$B perfThen gather detailed metrics via JavaScript:
$B eval "JSON.stringify(performance.getEntriesByType('navigation')[0])"Extract key metrics:
- TTFB (Time to First Byte):
responseStart - requestStart - FCP (First Contentful Paint): from PerformanceObserver or
paintentries - LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): from PerformanceObserver
- DOM Interactive:
domInteractive - navigationStart - DOM Complete:
domComplete - navigationStart - Full Load:
loadEventEnd - navigationStart
Resource analysis:
$B eval "JSON.stringify(performance.getEntriesByType('resource').map(r => ({name: r.name.split('/').pop().split('?')[0], type: r.initiatorType, size: r.transferSize, duration: Math.round(r.duration)})).sort((a,b) => b.duration - a.duration).slice(0,15))"Bundle size check:
$B eval "JSON.stringify(performance.getEntriesByType('resource').filter(r => r.initiatorType === 'script').map(r => ({name: r.name.split('/').pop().split('?')[0], size: r.transferSize})))"
$B eval "JSON.stringify(performance.getEntriesByType('resource').filter(r => r.initiatorType === 'css').map(r => ({name: r.name.split('/').pop().split('?')[0], size: r.transferSize})))"Network summary:
$B eval "(() => { const r = performance.getEntriesByType('resource'); return JSON.stringify({total_requests: r.length, total_transfer: r.reduce((s,e) => s + (e.transferSize||0), 0), by_type: Object.entries(r.reduce((a,e) => { a[e.initiatorType] = (a[e.initiatorType]||0) + 1; return a; }, {})).sort((a,b) => b[1]-a[1])})})()"Phase 4: Baseline Capture (--baseline mode)
Save metrics to baseline file:
{
"url": "<url>",
"timestamp": "<ISO>",
"branch": "<branch>",
"pages": {
"/": {
"ttfb_ms": 120,
"fcp_ms": 450,
"lcp_ms": 800,
"dom_interactive_ms": 600,
"dom_complete_ms": 1200,
"full_load_ms": 1400,
"total_requests": 42,
"total_transfer_bytes": 1250000,
"js_bundle_bytes": 450000,
"css_bundle_bytes": 85000,
"largest_resources": [
{"name": "main.js", "size": 320000, "duration": 180},
{"name": "vendor.js", "size": 130000, "duration": 90}
]
}
}
}Write to .pstack/benchmark-reports/baselines/baseline.json.
Phase 5: Comparison
If baseline exists, compare current metrics against it:
PERFORMANCE REPORT — [url]
══════════════════════════
Branch: [current-branch] vs baseline ([baseline-branch])
Page: /
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Metric Baseline Current Delta Status
──────── ──────── ─────── ───── ──────
TTFB 120ms 135ms +15ms OK
FCP 450ms 480ms +30ms OK
LCP 800ms 1600ms +800ms REGRESSION
DOM Interactive 600ms 650ms +50ms OK
DOM Complete 1200ms 1350ms +150ms WARNING
Full Load 1400ms 2100ms +700ms REGRESSION
Total Requests 42 58 +16 WARNING
Transfer Size 1.2MB 1.8MB +0.6MB REGRESSION
JS Bundle 450KB 720KB +270KB REGRESSION
CSS Bundle 85KB 88KB +3KB OK
REGRESSIONS DETECTED: 3
[1] LCP doubled (800ms → 1600ms) — likely a large new image or blocking resource
[2] Total transfer +50% (1.2MB → 1.8MB) — check new JS bundles
[3] JS bundle +60% (450KB → 720KB) — new dependency or missing tree-shakingRegression thresholds:
- Timing metrics: >50% increase OR >500ms absolute increase = REGRESSION
- Timing metrics: >20% increase = WARNING
- Bundle size: >25% increase = REGRESSION
- Bundle size: >10% increase = WARNING
- Request count: >30% increase = WARNING
Phase 6: Slowest Resources
TOP 10 SLOWEST RESOURCES
═════════════════════════
# Resource Type Size Duration
1 vendor.chunk.js script 320KB 480ms
2 main.js script 250KB 320ms
3 hero-image.webp img 180KB 280ms
4 analytics.js script 45KB 250ms ← third-party
5 fonts/inter-var.woff2 font 95KB 180ms
...
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- vendor.chunk.js: Consider code-splitting — 320KB is large for initial load
- analytics.js: Load async/defer — blocks rendering for 250ms
- hero-image.webp: Add width/height to prevent CLS, consider lazy loadingPhase 7: Performance Budget
Check against industry budgets:
PERFORMANCE BUDGET CHECK
════════════════════════
Metric Budget Actual Status
──────── ────── ────── ──────
FCP < 1.8s 0.48s PASS
LCP < 2.5s 1.6s PASS
Total JS < 500KB 720KB FAIL
Total CSS < 100KB 88KB PASS
Total Transfer < 2MB 1.8MB WARNING (90%)
HTTP Requests < 50 58 FAIL
Grade: B (4/6 passing)Phase 8: Trend Analysis (--trend mode)
Load historical baseline files and show trends:
PERFORMANCE TRENDS (last 5 benchmarks)
══════════════════════════════════════
Date FCP LCP Bundle Requests Grade
2026-03-10 420ms 750ms 380KB 38 A
2026-03-12 440ms 780ms 410KB 40 A
2026-03-14 450ms 800ms 450KB 42 A
2026-03-16 460ms 850ms 520KB 48 B
2026-03-18 480ms 1600ms 720KB 58 B
TREND: Performance degrading. LCP doubled in 8 days.
JS bundle growing 50KB/week. Investigate.Phase 9: Save Report
Write to .pstack/benchmark-reports/{date}-benchmark.md and .pstack/benchmark-reports/{date}-benchmark.json.
Important Rules
- Measure, don't guess. Use actual performance.getEntries() data, not estimates.
- Baseline is essential. Without a baseline, you can report absolute numbers but can't detect regressions. Always encourage baseline capture.
- Relative thresholds, not absolute. 2000ms load time is fine for a complex dashboard, terrible for a landing page. Compare against YOUR baseline.
- Third-party scripts are context. Flag them, but the user can't fix Google Analytics being slow. Focus recommendations on first-party resources.
- Bundle size is the leading indicator. Load time varies with network. Bundle size is deterministic. Track it religiously.
- Read-only. Produce the report. Don't modify code unless explicitly asked.
Other versions93 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 14
- mr-daedalium/ostack-saas★ 10856% same
- lucas-flatwhite/gstack-ko★ 4570% same
- CarbeneAI/Forge★ 971% same
- Samin12/skills★ 868% same
- blas1n/claude-skills★ 245% same
- IyedBecheikh/bstack★ 112% same
- jpoindexter/theft-kit★ 110% same
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 110% same
- adryanmoldokkr32-pixel/gstack★ 030% same
- ayuday/gstack★ 035% same
4 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 79
- garrytan/gstack★ 139ksame name
- dragonflydb/dragonfly★ 32ksame name
- xtermjs/xterm.js★ 21ksame name
- udecode/plate★ 17ksame name
- Z3Prover/z3★ 13ksame name
- androidx/androidx★ 6.1ksame name
- samchon/typia★ 5.9ksame name
- PaddlePaddle/FastDeploy★ 3.7ksame name
- zalando/skipper★ 3.3ksame name
- samchon/nestia★ 2.2ksame name
69 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use ios-clean, ios-fix and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Saqlain-811Skillios-clean
Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-fix
Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
seek888Skillpair-agent
Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".
Also in 10 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkilllanding-report
Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)
Also in 7 projects that use this
seek888Skillopen-gstack-browser
Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".
Also in 8 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkillsetup-gbrain
Set up gbrain for this coding agent: install the CLI, initialize a local PGLite or Supabase brain, register MCP, capture per-remote trust policy. One command from zero to "gbrain is running, and this agent can call it." Use when: "setup gbrain", "connect gbrain", "start gbrain", "install gbrain", "configure gbrain for this machine". (gstack)
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +2 more from Saqlain-811
- +2 more from ShreyRavi
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- browseSkill
- carefulSkill
- codexSkill
- connect-chromeSkill
- csoSkill
- design-consultationSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-shotgunSkill
- document-releaseSkill
- freezeSkill
- guardSkill
- investigateSkill
- land-and-deploySkill
- monitorSkill
- plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- plan-design-reviewSkill
- plan-eng-reviewSkill
- planSkill
- pstack-upgradeSkill
- qa-onlySkill
- qaSkill
- reflectSkill
- reviewSkill
- setup-browser-cookiesSkill
- setup-deploySkill
- shipSkill
- pstackSkill
- unfreezeSkill
- validateSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

