structured-data-extraction-pipeline
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build an LLM-based extraction system that converts free-form user input into validated, structured records with alias resolution and domain-specific rules. Use when building any system that needs to parse natural language into database-ready structured data — food logs, exercise logs, expense tracking, medical intake, etc.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- ablation-study-frameworkSkill
- async-http-websocket-patternsSkill
- brain-dumpSkill
- chaos-controlled-behavior-systemSkill
- daily-digestSkill
- database-reset-and-seedSkill
- duckdb-analytics-layerSkill
- event-driven-backtest-engineSkill
- event-study-full-pipelineSkill
- event-study-stats-suiteSkill
- failure-learning-systemSkill
- fastapi-sse-live-dashboardSkill
- goal-task-decompositionSkill
- high-information-gain-interviewerSkill
- idea-extraction-batch-pipelineSkill
- idea-grouping-taxonomySkill
- interview-belief-extractorSkill
- journal-captureSkill
- journal-reviewSkill
- keyword-filter-frameworkSkill
- langgraph-agentic-pipelineSkill
- llm-as-judge-eval-frameworkSkill
- multi-tab-dashboard-rendererSkill
- multi-tier-memory-systemSkill
- parquet-storage-with-walSkill
- project-insightsSkill
- pydantic-typed-config-loaderSkill
- quality-trend-detectionSkill
- research-gap-finderSkill
- safe-commitSkill
- simtom-knowledge-isolationSkill
- statistical-signal-detectionSkill
- streaming-dataset-pipelineSkill
- structured-logging-setupSkill
- system-health-monitoringSkill
- textual-tui-reactiveSkill
- vector-db-ingestionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 40
Every extraction domain needs a clear output schema.
- Distinctive: line 100
Before calling the LLM, reject inputs that are too vague to extract:
- Distinctive: line 170
When users refer to the same entity by different names, resolve to a canonical form.
- Distinctive: line 213
After extraction, detect what's missing and queue follow-up questions:
- Distinctive: line 242
When the user responds to follow-up questions, extract ONLY the missing fields and update existing records:
- Distinctive: line 299
When your system handles multiple extraction types, route based on keywords:
- Distinctive: line 322
Always use a robust JSON extractor that handles markdown wrapping and partial responses:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Structured Data Extraction Pipeline
Converts unstructured natural-language input into validated, structured records using LLM extraction with prompt templates, alias resolution (canonicalization), domain-specific validation rules, and follow-up handling for missing fields.
Architecture Overview
The pipeline has 4 layers:
User Input (free text)
|
v
[1. Pre-validation] — reject ambiguous/garbage input early
|
v
[2. LLM Extraction] — prompt template extracts structured JSON
|
v
[3. Canonicalization] — resolve aliases to canonical names
|
v
[4. Post-validation] — detect missing fields, trigger follow-ups
|
v
Structured Record → DBStep 1: Define Your Domain Schema
Every extraction domain needs a clear output schema. Define every field, its type, and whether it's required or optional.
# Example: a generic "event log" extraction schema
EVENT_SCHEMA = {
"event_name": str, # required — what happened
"category": str, # required — classification
"quantity": float, # optional — numeric value if applicable
"unit": str, # optional — unit of measurement
"intensity": str, # optional — "low", "medium", "high"
"timestamp": datetime, # derived — parsed from text or defaulted to now
"notes": str, # optional — any extra context
}Step 2: Build the LLM Extraction Prompt
The prompt is the core of the pipeline. It must include:
- Clear instructions on what to extract
- The exact JSON output format with field names and types
- Critical rules for edge cases (quantities, multiples, ambiguity)
- 2-3 concrete examples showing input-to-output mapping
from langchain.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
EXTRACTION_PROMPT = ChatPromptTemplate.from_template(
"""
Extract ALL items from the user's input as a JSON array.
User input: {input}
CRITICAL RULES:
- Multiple items = separate objects for EACH
- Always provide realistic estimates (never use 0.0 for known quantities)
- If quantity isn't stated, infer a standard default
- QUANTITY MATTERS: "3 cups" = triple the values of "1 cup"
Output format (JSON array only, no markdown):
[
{{"name": "item name with quantity", "value": 100.0, "category": "type", "unit": "kg"}}
]
Example - "2 meetings and a phone call":
[
{{"name": "2 meetings", "value": 2.0, "category": "meeting", "unit": "count"}},
{{"name": "phone call", "value": 1.0, "category": "call", "unit": "count"}}
]
"""
)Key prompt design principles:
- Explicitly handle multiples — LLMs often ignore quantity multipliers unless told
- Provide defaults — tell the LLM what to do when information is missing
- Show edge cases in examples — the examples are the strongest steering mechanism
- Output JSON only — explicitly say "no markdown" to prevent
jsonwrapping
Step 3: Pre-Validation (Reject Ambiguous Input)
Before calling the LLM, reject inputs that are too vague to extract:
MAX_INPUT_LEN = 5000
def extract_items(llm, input_text: str, user_id: str):
input_text = input_text[:MAX_INPUT_LEN]
input_lower = input_text.lower()
# Reject ambiguous input early — saves an LLM call
ambiguous_patterns = [
"something from", "forgot what", "don't remember", "not sure what"
]
if any(p in input_lower for p in ambiguous_patterns):
return {
"status": "ambiguous",
"message": "Please provide more details before logging."
}
# Proceed with LLM extraction
resp = (EXTRACTION_PROMPT | llm).invoke({"input": input_text}).content
items = extract_json(resp, is_array=True)
...Step 4: Natural Language Date/Time Parsing
Many extraction domains need date parsing from phrases like "yesterday", "last Tuesday", "2 weeks ago":
import re
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from dateutil import parser as dateutil_parser
WEEKDAYS = ['monday', 'tuesday', 'wednesday', 'thursday', 'friday',
'saturday', 'sunday']
def parse_date_reference(text: str) -> datetime:
"""Parse natural language date references. Falls back to now."""
text_lower = text.lower()
now = datetime.utcnow()
if "yesterday" in text_lower:
return now - timedelta(days=1)
days_match = re.search(r'(\d+)\s*days?\s*ago', text_lower)
if days_match:
return now - timedelta(days=int(days_match.group(1)))
# Try explicit date patterns
date_patterns = [
r'(\d{1,2}[/-]\d{1,2}[/-]\d{2,4})',
r'(\d{4}[/-]\d{1,2}[/-]\d{1,2})',
]
for pattern in date_patterns:
match = re.search(pattern, text_lower)
if match:
try:
parsed = dateutil_parser.parse(match.group(1), fuzzy=True)
if parsed > now:
parsed = parsed.replace(year=parsed.year - 1)
return parsed
except (ValueError, TypeError):
continue
return nowStep 5: Canonical Name Resolution (Alias Lookup)
When users refer to the same entity by different names, resolve to a canonical form. Use a priority-based lookup:
def resolve_canonical_name(raw_name: str, db_conn) -> str | None:
"""Resolve a raw name to its canonical entry.
Priority: exact alias match > exact name match > display name > substring.
Returns None if no match found.
"""
if not raw_name:
return None
normalized = raw_name.strip().lower()
with db_conn.cursor() as c:
c.execute(
"""SELECT name, priority FROM (
SELECT canonical_name AS name, 1 AS priority
FROM aliases WHERE LOWER(alias) = %s
UNION ALL
SELECT name, 2 AS priority
FROM entities WHERE LOWER(name) = %s
UNION ALL
SELECT name, 3 AS priority
FROM entities WHERE LOWER(display_name) = %s
UNION ALL
SELECT name, 4 AS priority
FROM entities WHERE LOWER(display_name) LIKE %s
) sub
ORDER BY priority, LENGTH(name) ASC
LIMIT 1""",
(normalized, normalized, normalized, f"%{normalized}%"),
)
row = c.fetchone()
return row[0] if row else NoneThis pattern requires two tables:
- entities — the canonical list (
name,display_name, metadata) - aliases — maps variant names to canonical (
alias->canonical_name)
Step 6: Post-Validation and Follow-Up Detection
After extraction, detect what's missing and queue follow-up questions:
def detect_missing_fields(items: list[dict]) -> list[str]:
"""Check extracted items for missing important fields."""
follow_ups = []
missing_quantity = [i for i in items if not i.get("quantity")]
if missing_quantity:
names = [i["name"] for i in missing_quantity][:3]
follow_ups.append(f"quantity for {', '.join(names)}")
missing_category = [i for i in items if not i.get("category")]
if missing_category:
names = [i["name"] for i in missing_category][:3]
follow_ups.append(f"category for {', '.join(names)}")
return follow_ups
# In the main extraction function:
result = {"status": "ok", "items": items, "logged_ids": logged_ids}
follow_ups = detect_missing_fields(items)
if follow_ups:
result["follow_up"] = follow_ups
return resultStep 7: Follow-Up Update Handler
When the user responds to follow-up questions, extract ONLY the missing fields and update existing records:
FOLLOW_UP_PROMPT = ChatPromptTemplate.from_template(
"""The user was asked follow-up questions about a previous entry.
Extract ONLY the answers to the missing fields.
Missing fields: {missing}
User's answer: {answer}
Map answers to these EXACT column names (no other keys allowed):
{allowed_columns}
Output JSON only:
{{"field_name": value}}
"""
)
def update_from_follow_up(llm, answer: str, context: dict) -> dict:
ids = context.get("ids", [])
missing = context.get("missing", [])
if not ids or not missing:
return {"status": "no_context"}
resp = (FOLLOW_UP_PROMPT | llm).invoke({
"missing": ", ".join(missing),
"answer": answer,
"allowed_columns": ", ".join(ALLOWED_COLUMNS),
}).content
extracted = extract_json(resp, is_array=False)
# Filter to allowed columns only
updates = {k: v for k, v in extracted.items()
if k in ALLOWED_COLUMNS and v is not None}
# Coerce numeric columns
for col in list(updates):
if col in NUMERIC_COLUMNS and not isinstance(updates[col], (int, float)):
nums = re.findall(r"[\d.]+", str(updates[col]))
updates[col] = float(nums[0]) if nums else None
# Apply updates to DB
with db_conn.cursor() as c:
for entry_id in ids:
set_parts = [f"{col} = %s" for col in updates]
c.execute(
f"UPDATE {table} SET {', '.join(set_parts)} WHERE id = %s",
list(updates.values()) + [entry_id],
)
return {"status": "ok", "fields_updated": list(updates.keys())}Step 8: Keyword-Based Routing (Multi-Domain)
When your system handles multiple extraction types, route based on keywords:
def dispatch_extraction(llm, input_text: str, user_id: str):
"""Route to the correct extraction tool based on input keywords."""
text_lower = input_text.lower()
# Define keyword sets per domain
domain_keywords = {
"cardio": ["ran", "run", "mile", "km", "cycling", "swim"],
"nutrition": ["ate", "breakfast", "lunch", "dinner", "snack"],
"workout": [], # default fallback
}
for domain, keywords in domain_keywords.items():
if any(kw in text_lower for kw in keywords):
return EXTRACTORS[domain](llm, input_text, user_id)
return EXTRACTORS["default"](llm, input_text, user_id)JSON Extraction Helper
Always use a robust JSON extractor that handles markdown wrapping and partial responses:
import json
import re
def extract_json(text: str, is_array: bool = False):
"""Extract JSON from LLM response, handling markdown code blocks."""
# Strip markdown code blocks
text = re.sub(r'```(?:json)?\s*', '', text).strip()
text = text.rstrip('`').strip()
try:
result = json.loads(text)
if is_array and not isinstance(result, list):
result = [result]
return result
except json.JSONDecodeError:
# Try to find JSON within the text
pattern = r'\[.*\]' if is_array else r'\{.*\}'
match = re.search(pattern, text, re.DOTALL)
if match:
return json.loads(match.group())
return [] if is_array else {}Common Pitfalls
- LLMs ignore quantities — Always include explicit quantity multiplication rules and examples in the prompt
- 0.0 defaults — LLMs return zeros when unsure; instruct them to estimate or use null instead
- Markdown wrapping — LLMs wrap JSON in ```json blocks; always strip these
- Ambiguous input wastes tokens — Pre-filter vague inputs before calling the LLM
- Follow-up field mapping — LLMs invent descriptive key names like
reps_for_bench_pressinstead ofreps; always filter to allowed columns - Numeric coercion — LLMs return
"8 ounces"instead of226.8; extract the number with regex
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

