artifact-management
Skill1 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create, update, and validate the living artifact documents — the six business artifacts (product requirements, functional requirements, NFRs, user journey map, system blueprint, executive briefing) and the five technical artifacts (interface specifications, data/security/deployment/observability architecture). Use when scaffolding artifacts, adding or changing requirements or design, running consistency validation, or bumping document versions.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cline/skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 18, 2026
- cline/pluginstheir own version, first seen Jun 12, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- cline/plugins★ 36same name
- cline/skills★ 35same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- add-adrSkill
- add-implementation-decisionSkill
- add-requirementSkill
- adr-managementSkill
- artifact-managementSkill
- enterprise-standardsSkill
- implementation-managementSkill
- implementation-statusSkill
- resume-implementationSkill
- run-implementation-reviewSkill
- run-review-cycleSkill
- start-architectureSkill
- start-ideationSkill
- start-implementationSkill
- writing-styleSkill
- adr-managementSkill
- enterprise-standardsSkill
- implementation-managementSkill
- writing-styleSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
After any artifact edit, to validate consistency before ending a phase.
- Very specific: line 30
Never hand-write a document shape.
- Very specific: line 32
Every application lives in its own folder: docs/artifacts/<app-name>/.
- Distinctive: line 39
After every change, run validation and resolve all errors before ending the phase.
- Very specific: line 46
If the application is brand new, also add a row for it in docs/artifacts/README.md.
- Distinctive: line 81
Add or modify rows in the relevant table(s), assigning the next sequential id.
- Distinctive: line 83
Keep each requirement atomic and testable.
- Very specific: line 101
Add --strict to also fail on advisory warnings (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 110
Every cross-referenced id resolves to an id defined in some artifact.
- Very specific: line 111
Every functional requirement traces to a PR-* or UJ-* (warning, or error in --strict).
- Very specific: line 118
Pick the app first: Every command targets docs/artifacts/<app-name>.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Artifact Management
Authoritative procedure for producing and maintaining the workflow's living artifacts:
six business artifacts (ideation phase) and five technical artifacts
(architecture phase). Only the artifact-manager agent should apply these edits; other
agents propose content. Architecture Decision Records are handled by the sibling
adr-management skill.
Artifact Manager is also the sole writer of phase-3 state under
docs/artifacts/<app>/implementation/, but those documents use the separate
implementation-management procedure and CLI;
they are not additional business or technical artifact types.
When to use
- Starting a new project (scaffold the full set from templates).
- A new requirement, persona, journey, or component was agreed during ideation.
- An existing requirement changed, was refined, or removed.
- After any artifact edit, to validate consistency before ending a phase.
Ground rules
- Never hand-write a document shape. Always start from the templates in
./assets/templates/. - Every application lives in its own folder:
docs/artifacts/<app-name>/. All commands below target that per-application directory — never baredocs/artifacts. The active<app-name>is provided by the orchestrator at session start. - Requirement IDs are stable and never reused within an application. The same id may
exist independently in another app. Follow
./references/id-conventions.md. - Frontmatter must match
./references/artifact-schema.md. - After every change, run validation and resolve all errors before ending the phase.
Procedure
1. Scaffold (first time only)
Replace <app> with the active application's folder (e.g. docs/artifacts/customer-portal).
If the application is brand new, also add a row for it in
docs/artifacts/README.md.
python -m artifact_tools scaffold product-requirements docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"
python -m artifact_tools scaffold functional-requirements docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"
python -m artifact_tools scaffold non-functional-requirements docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"
python -m artifact_tools scaffold user-journey-map docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"
python -m artifact_tools scaffold system-blueprint docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"
python -m artifact_tools scaffold executive-briefing docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"Type aliases also work: prd, fr, nfr, journey, blueprint, briefing.
In the architecture phase, scaffold the technical artifacts the same way:
python -m artifact_tools scaffold interface-specifications docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"
python -m artifact_tools scaffold data-architecture docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"
python -m artifact_tools scaffold security-architecture docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"
python -m artifact_tools scaffold deployment-topology docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"
python -m artifact_tools scaffold observability-strategy docs/artifacts/<app> --project "<Name>"Technical aliases: interfaces, data, security, deployment, observability.
Scaffolding interface-specifications also creates the <app>/interfaces/
contract store (synchronous/, asynchronous/, graphql/). That single-file document
is a routing index — record real API/event/schema contracts as native .yaml /
.json / .graphql / .proto files there, one contract per file, and link each from
the index. Re-create the store at any time with
python -m artifact_tools interfaces init docs/artifacts/<app>.
2. Edit content
- Add or modify rows in the relevant table(s), assigning the next sequential id.
- Fill cross-reference columns (
traces_to,satisfies,mitigates) with existing ids. - Keep each requirement atomic and testable.
- To retire an item, set its row
Statustoremoved; do not delete the row.
3. Record the change and bump the version
python -m artifact_tools changelog docs/artifacts/<app>/functional-requirements.md "Added FR-014 for offline sync" --phase 1This appends a changelog line and bumps version + last_updated in frontmatter.
4. Validate (always)
python -m artifact_tools validate docs/artifacts/<app>- Exit code
0= consistent. Non-zero = errors that must be fixed. - Add
--strictto also fail on advisory warnings (e.g. missing traceability). - Validate every application at once with
python -m artifact_tools validate docs/artifacts; each app is checked in isolation and findings are prefixed with the app folder name.
What validation checks
- Frontmatter completeness and valid
status/version/last_updated/phase. artifactfield matches the file type.- Ids are unique within a table and use the correct prefix for the document.
- Every cross-referenced id resolves to an id defined in some artifact.
- Every functional requirement traces to a
PR-*orUJ-*(warning, or error in--strict).
Multiple applications
A workspace can hold many applications, each in its own docs/artifacts/<app-name>/
folder with its own full artifact set, architecture-decisions/, and interfaces/.
- Pick the app first. Every command targets
docs/artifacts/<app-name>. Never write artifacts to the baredocs/artifactsroot — that folder only holds the applications index (README.md). - New application? Choose a short kebab-case slug for the folder, scaffold into it,
and add a row to
docs/artifacts/README.md. - IDs are per application.
FR-001in one app is unrelated toFR-001in another. Cross-references only resolve within the same application's folder.
Resources
- Templates:
./assets/templates/ - Schema:
./references/artifact-schema.md - ID conventions:
./references/id-conventions.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

