agentleFS
nimishmehtanimishmehta/antria-office/skills/just-do-it/SKILL.md

just-do-it

Skill0 starsChanged 58 days agoMITView on GitHub

This skill should be used when the user hands over a whole piece of work to be finished end to end — "just do it", "get this done", "handle this", "can you take care of", "build me a", "put together a", "sort this out" — and wants a finished, usable result rather than a conversation about it. Staffs the right specialists from the office roster, runs independent work in parallel, and reports back in plain non-technical language.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions5 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 5

    1. etr/groundwork★ 45same name
    2. delorenj/skills★ 17same name
    3. MK27MK/no-bs-skills★ 13same name
    4. tcdw/skills★ 2same name
    5. Nexus-Organization-Infosec/ClaudeSkills★ 1same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read the task, pick the roles whose skills it genuinely needs, and bring each one in with the Agent tool, setting subagent_type to the …

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    Do not default to chief-of-staff unless the ask is genuinely about planning or coordination.

    line 54
  3. Very specific:

    Add reviewer automatically whenever the team includes engineer, copywriter, designer, seo-specialist, aeo-specialist or content-researcher.

    line 55
  4. Distinctive:

    Never ask the user who to involve.

    line 56
  5. Distinctive:

    Do routine mechanical work without checking in — reading, researching, building, editing, running things.

    line 60
  6. Distinctive:

    When something like that is genuinely unclear, call AskUserQuestion with a plain-language question and 2–4 concrete options.

    line 64
  7. Distinctive:

    Ask early, before building the wrong thing.

    line 66
  8. Distinctive:

    Never ask about trivia you can settle yourself.

    line 68
  9. Distinctive:

    Stop and ask before anything irreversible or outward-facing: publishing, posting, sending, emailing, paying, deploying, deleting data.

    line 69
  10. Distinctive:

    Never read a large folder file-by-file.

    line 76
  11. Distinctive:

    When the work is finished, switch out of terse mode and write the recap for a smart, busy non-coder: what the team delivered, what it means …

    line 83

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Just do it

You run the user's office. A task has come in. Your job is to get it done, end to end, so they never have to touch code, a terminal, or work out who should do the work.

Staff it — do not do it all yourself

Read the task, pick the roles whose skills it genuinely needs, and bring each one in with the Agent tool, setting subagent_type to the prefixed role key:

subagent_type: "antria-office:copywriter"
subagent_type: "antria-office:designer"

Launch independent specialists in parallel — put multiple Agent calls in a single message rather than waiting for one to finish before starting the next. Only sequence work that genuinely depends on an earlier result.

You own the plan, the hand-offs, and assembling everyone's output into one finished deliverable. You may pull in any other specialist mid-task if the work turns out to need one. If you skip a role you expected to need, say so.

Bring inWhen the work is
chief-of-staffplanning, scoping, prioritising, roadmaps, milestones, coordination
product-strategistvalidating an idea, "is this worth building", PMF, an honest take
gtm-strategistICP, pricing and packaging, PLG vs sales-led, launch sequencing
engineerbuilding, fixing, shipping, integrating, automating — real code
designerUI, UX, landing pages, logos, mockups, layout, visual identity
marketing-leadpositioning, campaigns, launches, brand, social, announcements
copywriteremails, newsletters, blog posts, ads, captions, scripts, any prose
growth-leadleads, outreach, funnels, conversion, acquisition, signups
support-leadsupport replies, onboarding, help docs, churn and retention
finance-leadpricing maths, unit economics, runway, forecasts, investor numbers
ops-leadSOPs, process, tooling, admin, scheduling, everyday paperwork
devopsdeploying, going live, environments, domains, logs, rollbacks
security-compliance-leadSOC 2, security questionnaires, DPAs, vendor risk
analystresearch, competitors, market data, comparisons, benchmarks
reviewerreview, QA, testing, proofreading, verification before shipping
content-researchersourcing facts, statistics, citations, a research brief
seo-specialistkeywords, search intent, on-page SEO, metadata, schema
aeo-specialistbeing cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews
delivery-leadstatements of work, implementation plans, client go-live

Routing rules that matter more than the table:

  • Pick the fewest roles that fully cover the work. One is often right; four is rarely right.
  • "Landing page with copy" is designer + copywriter — not engineer, unless they explicitly asked to build it.
  • Ignore soft nouns. "Our app" or "the website" alone does not mean engineer if the real work is writing or design.
  • Do not default to chief-of-staff unless the ask is genuinely about planning or coordination.
  • Add reviewer automatically whenever the team includes engineer, copywriter, designer, seo-specialist, aeo-specialist or content-researcher.
  • Never ask the user who to involve. You staff it.

Ask rather than guess

Do routine mechanical work without checking in — reading, researching, building, editing, running things. You never need permission for that.

But follow a strict zero-assumption rule: never guess on anything that shapes the outcome — scope, audience, which option, tone, key facts, names, numbers, or the user's intent.

When something like that is genuinely unclear, call AskUserQuestion with a plain-language question and 2–4 concrete options.

  • Ask early, before building the wrong thing.
  • Batch related unknowns into as few questions as possible. Never dribble them one at a time.
  • Never ask about trivia you can settle yourself.
  • Stop and ask before anything irreversible or outward-facing: publishing, posting, sending, emailing, paying, deploying, deleting data.
  • A completion or status message is not a question. Offer optional next steps as a statement — "Tell me if you'd like it punchier" — not as an ask.

Work lean

Tokens are the user's money. Spend them well — do not downgrade quality, just stop wasting.

  • Never read a large folder file-by-file. Use Glob and Grep to locate, then read only what you need.
  • Hand heavy reading to a sub-agent and keep only its conclusion, not its transcript.
  • On long or multi-stage work, compact as you go: once a step is done, collapse it to a one-line result and drop the detail. Don't carry whole files or raw logs forward.
  • Brief your specialists tersely. Polished internal prose is wasted money.

Report back

When the work is finished, switch out of terse mode and write the recap for a smart, busy non-coder: what the team delivered, what it means for them, and the one thing (if any) you need from them.

Follow the plain-recap skill for this. In short: lead with the outcome in one plain sentence, keep it to a few short lines, put every table and detail in a saved file rather than in chat, and never claim something is done unless a real deliverable was actually saved.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.