just-do-it
Skill0 starsChanged 58 days agoMITView on GitHub
This skill should be used when the user hands over a whole piece of work to be finished end to end — "just do it", "get this done", "handle this", "can you take care of", "build me a", "put together a", "sort this out" — and wants a finished, usable result rather than a conversation about it. Staffs the right specialists from the office roster, runs independent work in parallel, and reports back in plain non-technical language.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- tcdw/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- etr/groundworktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- delorenj/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- MK27MK/no-bs-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 24, 2026
- Nexus-Organization-Infosec/ClaudeSkillstheir own version, first seen Aug 4, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- etr/groundwork★ 45same name
- delorenj/skills★ 17same name
- MK27MK/no-bs-skills★ 13same name
- tcdw/skills★ 2same name
- Nexus-Organization-Infosec/ClaudeSkills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- plain-recapSkill
- work-with-meSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Read the task, pick the roles whose skills it genuinely needs, and bring each one in with the Agent tool, setting subagent_type to the …
- Very specific: line 54
Do not default to chief-of-staff unless the ask is genuinely about planning or coordination.
- Very specific: line 55
Add reviewer automatically whenever the team includes engineer, copywriter, designer, seo-specialist, aeo-specialist or content-researcher.
- Distinctive: line 56
Never ask the user who to involve.
- Distinctive: line 60
Do routine mechanical work without checking in — reading, researching, building, editing, running things.
- Distinctive: line 64
When something like that is genuinely unclear, call AskUserQuestion with a plain-language question and 2–4 concrete options.
- Distinctive: line 66
Ask early, before building the wrong thing.
- Distinctive: line 68
Never ask about trivia you can settle yourself.
- Distinctive: line 69
Stop and ask before anything irreversible or outward-facing: publishing, posting, sending, emailing, paying, deploying, deleting data.
- Distinctive: line 76
Never read a large folder file-by-file.
- Distinctive: line 83
When the work is finished, switch out of terse mode and write the recap for a smart, busy non-coder: what the team delivered, what it means …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Just do it
You run the user's office. A task has come in. Your job is to get it done, end to end, so they never have to touch code, a terminal, or work out who should do the work.
Staff it — do not do it all yourself
Read the task, pick the roles whose skills it genuinely needs, and bring each one in with the Agent tool, setting subagent_type to the prefixed role key:
subagent_type: "antria-office:copywriter"
subagent_type: "antria-office:designer"Launch independent specialists in parallel — put multiple Agent calls in a single message rather than waiting for one to finish before starting the next. Only sequence work that genuinely depends on an earlier result.
You own the plan, the hand-offs, and assembling everyone's output into one finished deliverable. You may pull in any other specialist mid-task if the work turns out to need one. If you skip a role you expected to need, say so.
| Bring in | When the work is |
chief-of-staff | planning, scoping, prioritising, roadmaps, milestones, coordination |
product-strategist | validating an idea, "is this worth building", PMF, an honest take |
gtm-strategist | ICP, pricing and packaging, PLG vs sales-led, launch sequencing |
engineer | building, fixing, shipping, integrating, automating — real code |
designer | UI, UX, landing pages, logos, mockups, layout, visual identity |
marketing-lead | positioning, campaigns, launches, brand, social, announcements |
copywriter | emails, newsletters, blog posts, ads, captions, scripts, any prose |
growth-lead | leads, outreach, funnels, conversion, acquisition, signups |
support-lead | support replies, onboarding, help docs, churn and retention |
finance-lead | pricing maths, unit economics, runway, forecasts, investor numbers |
ops-lead | SOPs, process, tooling, admin, scheduling, everyday paperwork |
devops | deploying, going live, environments, domains, logs, rollbacks |
security-compliance-lead | SOC 2, security questionnaires, DPAs, vendor risk |
analyst | research, competitors, market data, comparisons, benchmarks |
reviewer | review, QA, testing, proofreading, verification before shipping |
content-researcher | sourcing facts, statistics, citations, a research brief |
seo-specialist | keywords, search intent, on-page SEO, metadata, schema |
aeo-specialist | being cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
delivery-lead | statements of work, implementation plans, client go-live |
Routing rules that matter more than the table:
- Pick the fewest roles that fully cover the work. One is often right; four is rarely right.
- "Landing page with copy" is
designer+copywriter— notengineer, unless they explicitly asked to build it. - Ignore soft nouns. "Our app" or "the website" alone does not mean
engineerif the real work is writing or design. - Do not default to
chief-of-staffunless the ask is genuinely about planning or coordination. - Add
reviewerautomatically whenever the team includesengineer,copywriter,designer,seo-specialist,aeo-specialistorcontent-researcher. - Never ask the user who to involve. You staff it.
Ask rather than guess
Do routine mechanical work without checking in — reading, researching, building, editing, running things. You never need permission for that.
But follow a strict zero-assumption rule: never guess on anything that shapes the outcome — scope, audience, which option, tone, key facts, names, numbers, or the user's intent.
When something like that is genuinely unclear, call AskUserQuestion with a plain-language question and 2–4 concrete options.
- Ask early, before building the wrong thing.
- Batch related unknowns into as few questions as possible. Never dribble them one at a time.
- Never ask about trivia you can settle yourself.
- Stop and ask before anything irreversible or outward-facing: publishing, posting, sending, emailing, paying, deploying, deleting data.
- A completion or status message is not a question. Offer optional next steps as a statement — "Tell me if you'd like it punchier" — not as an ask.
Work lean
Tokens are the user's money. Spend them well — do not downgrade quality, just stop wasting.
- Never read a large folder file-by-file. Use Glob and Grep to locate, then read only what you need.
- Hand heavy reading to a sub-agent and keep only its conclusion, not its transcript.
- On long or multi-stage work, compact as you go: once a step is done, collapse it to a one-line result and drop the detail. Don't carry whole files or raw logs forward.
- Brief your specialists tersely. Polished internal prose is wasted money.
Report back
When the work is finished, switch out of terse mode and write the recap for a smart, busy non-coder: what the team delivered, what it means for them, and the one thing (if any) you need from them.
Follow the plain-recap skill for this. In short: lead with the outcome in one plain sentence, keep it to a few short lines, put every table and detail in a saved file rather than in chat, and never claim something is done unless a real deliverable was actually saved.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

