agentleFS
niklas-radyantniklas-radyant/claude-skills/CLAUDE.md

claude-skills

CLAUDE.md6 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub

Notes to myself. This repo is a personal collection, not a community project — no PRs, so there's nothing here about reviewing other people's. 1. mkdir -p plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name> 2. Copy templates/SKILL.md into it and write the skill. The directory name and the frontmatter name must match — Claude Code addresses the skill by directory. 3. Put anything long (per-language checklists, worked examples, recipes) in skills/<skill-name>/reference/*.md and link it from the body by relative path. Those files load only when the…

  • In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.

The file

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Put anything long (per-language checklists, worked examples, recipes) in skills/<skill-name>/reference/*.md and link it from the body by …

    line 27
  2. Very specific:

    Add a row to the catalog table in README.md, and a section below it.

    line 36
  3. Very specific:

    Add it to the table in START-HERE.md too, with where it works and its raw link.

    line 37
  4. Very specific:

    Create plugins/<theme>/ with the layout above, then register it in .claude-plugin/marketplace.json under plugins with "source": …

    line 56
  5. Very specific:

    Check that it fires on a natural sentence, not just on /<skill-name>.

    line 89

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

Working in this repo

Notes to myself. This repo is a personal collection, not a community project — no PRs, so there's nothing here about reviewing other people's.

Layout

.claude-plugin/marketplace.json   # lists every plugin; users add this repo as a marketplace
plugins/<theme>/
├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json    # name must equal the directory name
└── skills/<skill-name>/
    ├── SKILL.md                  # always read when the skill fires
    └── reference/                # loaded only when SKILL.md sends the model there
scripts/validate.py               # run before pushing; CI runs it on every PR
scripts/package.py                # builds dist/<skill>.zip for claude.ai and ChatGPT uploads
START-HERE.md                     # read by an assistant when someone pastes the repo link
templates/SKILL.md                # starting point for a new skill

Adding a skill to an existing plugin

  1. mkdir -p plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>
  2. Copy templates/SKILL.md into it and write the skill. The directory name and the frontmatter name must match — Claude Code addresses the skill by directory.
  3. Put anything long (per-language checklists, worked examples, recipes) in skills/<skill-name>/reference/*.md and link it from the body by relative path. Those files load only when the body sends the model to them, which keeps the always-read part small. claude plugin details <plugin> shows the split: always-on tokens vs. on-invoke.
  4. Bump version in both plugins/<plugin>/.claude-plugin/plugin.json and the plugin's entry in .claude-plugin/marketplace.json. This is the step that gets forgotten — the validator fails on drift, which is why it exists.
  5. Add a row to the catalog table in README.md, and a section below it. Add it to the table in START-HERE.md too, with where it works and its raw link. That file is what an assistant reads when someone pastes the repo link, so a skill missing there doesn't exist for non-coders.
  6. Rebuild the upload zips and validate:
python3 scripts/package.py && python3 scripts/validate.py && claude plugin validate .

The validator fails if a zip in dist/ doesn't match its source, or if a skill is missing from START-HERE.md or README.md.

Adding a new plugin

Group by theme, not one plugin per skill: skills surface as <plugin>:<skill>, so a plugin per skill gives you pr-preflight:pr-preflight. A theme also means anyone who installed it picks up later skills in that area without doing anything.

Create plugins/<theme>/ with the layout above, then register it in .claude-plugin/marketplace.json under plugins with "source": "./plugins/<theme>". An unregistered plugin directory is not installable, and the validator treats that as an error rather than letting it ship silently.

The bar for adding one

  • It has been run repeatedly on real work. Not "this seems like a good idea" — something that survived actual use and got fixed where it broke.
  • It works in a repo it wasn't written for. This is the one that disqualifies most drafts. A skill that hard-codes npm run lint works in one repo; one that reads the repo's CI config works everywhere. If it can't discover what it needs, it isn't ready to publish.
  • It states its own failure modes. What it doesn't do, and where it can be wrong, belongs in the skill. A skill that oversells itself gets trusted in situations it can't handle.
  • No house rules. Anything true only of one employer's codebase gets stripped, or turned into a documented option that self-detects at runtime.

Testing a skill before publishing it

Reading it is not testing it. Both defects in v0.1.1 and v0.1.2 were found by running pr-preflight against a repo it wasn't written for, and neither was visible on the page:

  1. Install it for real — claude plugin marketplace add <path-or-repo> then claude plugin install <plugin>@niklas-skills.
  2. Pick a repo whose shape is unlike the one the skill came from. Different package manager, no CI, unusual script names. That is where assumptions surface.
  3. Plant known defects that the type-checker won't catch, so you're testing the skill's judgment rather than tsc.
  4. Check that it fires on a natural sentence, not just on /<skill-name>. The description is the whole trigger surface; a skill that installs but never activates looks fine in the repo and is worthless in practice.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.