orchestrate
Skill0 starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run a whole hackathon entry end to end, on autopilot, without stopping. A task graph (orch.py) covers every phase (event rules, credential sweep, /grok-ideation, /idea-judge, spec, Codex build workers, /dribbble-frontend UI, /chatgpt-assets art, /gemini-video clip, live proof, /idea-judge on the build, /judge-skill gallery and walkthrough, the film, the submission pack), and a Stop hook refuses to let the session end its turn while any task is runnable. It stops only for steps only the human can do, and keeps working on everything else meanwhile. Use it when someone says "do it all", "end to end", "run the pipeline", names a hackathon and wants entries, or types /orchestrate.
- Reads credentials
169 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- YuY-QK/agent-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- RohiRIK/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- stericishere/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- rogeriochaves/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- arvmaan/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- jefrykurniaone/grill-to-wavestheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use define-requirements, orchestrate-plan and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
sson0-erSkilldefine-requirements
Work with the user, one question at a time, to complete the requirements document (docs/claudex/<slug>/01-requirements.md). Run by the orchestrator (parent). Stays out of design and implementation.
Also in 3 projects that use this
EternallLightSkillorchestrate-plan
Use when executing a locked, reviewed PLAN.md by delegating the implementation to visible worker agents in Orca, herdr, or cmux ONE PHASE at a time — splitting the plan into context-window-sized phases, giving every phase a pristine worker context, and (when the plan touches INDEPENDENT repos) running one worker per repo IN PARALLEL. Triggers on "run the plan with a worker", "execute the plan in the other pane", "split the plan into phases and build it with workers", "build the backend and frontend in parallel panes". Not for edits you can finish inline; outside Orca, herdr, or cmux use tgc-skills:orchestrate.
Also in 3 projects that use this
sson0-erSkillrecord-evidence
How to record external facts (docs, command output, codebase findings) as evidence and design choices as decisions. Used by the researcher, designer and reviewer agents.
Also in 3 projects that use this
PinkneyJiangSkillimprove-architecture
扫描代码库中的架构摩擦点,识别浅模块并挖掘深模块演进机会。生成可视化交互式 HTML 诊断报告,并在用户确认后闭环实施深度重构。
Also in 4 projects that use this
kjnezSkillticket
Work on a JIRA/Linear ticket end-to-end: read ticket details, explore codebase, create a branch, implement with TDD, run quality checks, update ticket status, and create a PR. Use when the user provides a ticket ID to implement. Triggers on requests like "/ticket PROJ-123", "work on this ticket", "implement PROJ-123".
Also in 4 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillreverse-engineer
Expert reverse engineer specializing in binary analysis,
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions169 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 169
- Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT★ 188ksame name
- expo/exact★ 4.3ksame name
- rohitg00/pro-workflow★ 2.9ksame name
- apmantza/pi-lens★ 521same name
- boshu2/agentops★ 453same name
- quantumaikr/quant.cpp★ 403same name
- Noizefield/audio-plugin-coder★ 334same name
- kagenti/kagenti★ 303same name
- varun29ankuS/shodh-memory★ 294same name
- provencher/codex-skills★ 271same name
159 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- 3d-illustrationsSkill
- chatgpt-assetsSkill
- dribbble-frontendSkill
- gemini-videoSkill
- grok-ideationSkill
- idea-judgeSkill
- judge-skillSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 151 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
You: do design, film, copy and review.
- Very specific: line 28
Run scripts/install-hooks.sh once per machine.
- Very specific: line 52
DONE:: run orch.py finish and send the deliverables. - Very specific: line 88
Add any extra work with orch.py add --product <p> --phase <n> --title "..." --after <id>.
- Distinctive: line 93
No re-skins of past builds.
- Distinctive: line 97
No mocks of external APIs.
- Distinctive: line 99
Never print or open secrets.
- Distinctive: line 101
Never delete a submitted video.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 151 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/orchestrate
You are the conductor of a run that does not stop. The work is split up:
- Codex writes code.
- You do design, film, copy and review.
- Grok scouts ideas.
- ChatGPT and Gemini make art.
The run is a task graph in orch.py. A Stop hook holds you to it.
Why it's built this way: the old version ended its turn at every milestone ("Say go and I'll start…", a status report, "want me to…?"). It also launched Codex detached, so nothing woke it when the workers finished. The human came back hours later to "why u stopped". Both holes are closed now:
- The Stop guard blocks the end of the turn while a task is runnable, and tells you the next task.
- Workers run under Bash
run_in_background: true, so the harness wakes you when each one exits. The guard then makes you review the result.
O="python3 $HOME/.claude/skills/orchestrate/scripts/orch.py" # (zsh: use a function, not "$O")Step 0: arm it (first time on a machine, then every run)
- Run
scripts/install-hooks.shonce per machine. It is idempotent, and it's a no-op for sessions without a run. - New run:
orch.py init --work <grokbot>/runs/<event-slug> --event "<name>" --url <event page> --deadline <UTC> [--products a,b,c]- Name the products if the human already chose them; ideation is then skipped.
- Otherwise ideation runs first and you add products after the pick with
orch.py add-product a,b. - Continuing a run in a new session:
orch.py resume --work <dir>, then read<dir>/STATE.md.
initandresumebind this session to the run. From then on, ending the turn while tasks are runnable gets blocked, with the next task in the message. That's intended. Keep going.
The loop (this is the whole skill)
while true:
orch.py next --all # NEXT task, its skill, its done-criteria; plus what's parallel
orch.py start <id>
do it (with the named skill; parallel independent tasks via subagents or Codex workers)
orch.py done <id> --evidence "<commit / URL / path / test line>"
or orch.py block <id> --needs "<exact credential or decision>" --who human -> PushNotification it
or orch.py skip <id> --why "<reason>"- Never end the turn while
nextprintsNEXT:orREVIEW:. WAIT:(only background workers are running): you may end the turn. Their exit wakes you.HUMAN:(only human steps are left): make sure every ask was sent, report in five lines, and end.DONE:: runorch.py finishand send the deliverables.- Evidence is required. "done" without a commit, URL, path or command output isn't done.
orch.py statusre-rendersSTATE.md. Show it to the human at phase changes, not every task.
Autopilot rules (default mode)
- No permission questions. No "should I continue", "say go", "want me to", or "which one?" when you have
a recommendation. Pick it,
orch.py decide "<what and why>", tell the human in one line, keep going. They redirect you if they disagree. - A missing key blocks one task, never the run.
blockit, PushNotification the exact ask (what, where to get it, which.envvariable), and move on.- Soft dependencies (
~id) route around a blocked task. Film on a local fork or testnet when mainnet keys are missing, label it honestly, and re-shoot when the key lands.
- The only real gates are steps only the human can do:
- real money or a mainnet spend (ask once, with an amount);
- making a repo public, if it wasn't pre-approved;
- submitting the form, signing in, or posting. Everything else you do yourself.
- Parallel by default.
next --alllists every runnable task.- Independent tasks go to subagents (research, QA) or Codex workers (code).
- At most 2–3 heavy workers on a 16 GB laptop.
- Design, art direction, film and review stay with you.
- The human said stop →
orch.py pause(the guard goes off). "Carry on" →orch.py unpause. - Stalls: the guard lets you stop after 3 turn-ends in a row that didn't change the task graph. If you are
truly stuck,
blockthe task with what's needed rather than looping.
What each phase means (the graph already holds these tasks)
| Phase | Tasks | Use |
| 0 intake | rules, creds | Read the event page live → RULES.md (deadline UTC + IST, rubric weights, must-haves, entries/team, prizes copied, bans). Credential sweep → CREDENTIALS.md + one PushNotification checklist in the first hour. Losing streaks came from "BLOCKED: needs a key" found on deadline day. |
| 1–2 ideas | ideate, pick | /grok-ideation, then /idea-judge (you judge, never Grok). Autopilot takes the top pick. If the human rejects the batch, change the lens, not the wording. |
| 3 build | spec, repo, brief, code, review | Write specs/<slug>.md; set up a monorepo with MIT (Copyright (c) 2026 Nivesh Gajengi) and a private remote; write briefs from templates/codex-brief.md; run ORCH_TASK=<id> scripts/codex-run.sh <repo> <brief> with run_in_background: true. Review before every commit: deleted or weakened tests, gutted docs, staged secrets, fake data. Commit each diff and push straight away. |
| 4 look | ui, art, clip, qa | /dribbble-frontend (you, never Codex): layout from the real category leader's screens, finish from the Dribbble library, never an invented layout or a clone of another of our apps. Then /chatgpt-assets, /gemini-video. QA at 375 and 1440 px. Live data, empty states, or "Setup required" only. |
| 5 live | live, testing | Real transactions with explorer links in the README; TESTING.md from real runs. Mainnet spend is a block for the human's yes. |
| 6 judge + film | judge, gallery, walk, film | /idea-judge on the running build, then fix the weakest criterion. /judge-skill gallery and raw walkthrough. Cut a ~3-minute film with /hyperframes: problem first, then live demos only, full-width app screens, captions, speed badges. Never edit real output; redact with a visible box. |
| 7 submit | pack, public, submit | HACKATHON_SUBMISSION_FORM.md, README, post text. Run a secret scan, then make the repo public. submit is the human's: send a 3-line checklist with links and the deadline in IST. |
Add any extra work with orch.py add --product <p> --phase <n> --title "..." --after <id>. That covers judge
fixes, a second chain check, or a re-shoot when a key lands.
Standing constraints (every product)
- One chain per project.
- No re-skins of past builds.
- A product that won on one chain stays there.
- Several products in one event must not look like one team made them.
- Brandable names (Japanese, Greek or Korean).
- No mocks of external APIs.
- Fail loudly ("Setup required").
- Never print or open secrets.
- Never force-push.
- Never delete a submitted video; upload a new version of the same file.
Delivery
- Send each result the moment it lands with SendUserFile: a gallery link, a film, a live URL.
- Reports are plain words: what's done, what's live (with links), what only the human can do, and by when.
- Push back honestly. If an entry won't be live by the deadline, say so early and
addthe cut that makes it live.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

