release-gate
Skill4 starsChanged 50 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when: user asks to push, tag, release, publish, create a version, validate synchronization, fix CI, inspect GitHub Actions, or make changes safe for GitHub. Runs the FFBB MCP Server release-readiness workflow, adapted from sickn33 skills lint-and-validate, verification-before-completion, git-pushing, iterate-pr, and codebase-audit-pre-push.
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- philoserf/claude-code-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- kaandgnsh/Claude-Bluetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- my-chiefmind/ai-maestrotheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- jfkconstruct/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- imchangchang/dsh-onetheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- mepotts/agent-operating-kittheir own version, first seen Sep 30, 2026
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- philoserf/claude-code-config★ 14same name
- my-chiefmind/ai-maestro★ 6same name
- wakqasahmed/ai-engineering-workflow-skills★ 2same name
- wakqasahmed/skills★ 2same name
- CaduS0uza/qa-supreme★ 1same name
- imchangchang/dsh-one★ 1same name
- jfkconstruct/claude-skills★ 0same name
- kaandgnsh/Claude-Blue★ 0same name
- mepotts/agent-operating-kit★ 0same name
- youraioffice/your-ai-office-tools★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- website/llms-full.txtllms.txt
- website/llms.txtllms.txt
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
Use this skill for any request involving push, tag, release, publish, version, CI, GitHub Actions, or remote synchronization.
- Very specific: line 21
Use rtk for all terminal commands.
- Distinctive: line 23
Do not claim completion without fresh command output.
- Distinctive: line 24
Do not push, tag, release, or publish if any local gate fails.
- Distinctive: line 25
Keep changes surgical; do not refactor unrelated code.
- Distinctive: line 30
Run the full gate, in this order:
- Very specific: line 47
If version files changed, run rtk uv run python tools/sync_version.py, inspect the diff, then rerun the required local gate.
- Distinctive: line 51
Only when the user explicitly asks to push or publish changes:
- Distinctive: line 53
Run the required local gate.
- Distinctive: line 56
Commit with a conventional commit message.
- Distinctive: line 61
If CI fails, fix the root cause locally, rerun the relevant gate plus any affected tests, commit, push, and re-check CI.
- Very specific: line 68
Update pyproject.toml and run rtk uv run python tools/sync_version.py.
- Distinctive: line 79
Create an annotated tag.
- Distinctive: line 85
When GitHub Actions fail:
- Distinctive: line 87
Read the failed job logs before changing code.
- Distinctive: line 90
Run the exact local check matching the failure, then the required gate if pushing.
- Distinctive: line 92
Follow CI until green, or report the blocker with the failing check and evidence.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Release Gate — FFBB MCP Server
Use this skill for any request involving push, tag, release, publish, version, CI, GitHub Actions, or remote synchronization.
This workflow adapts the relevant patterns from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills:
lint-and-validate: validate after changes.verification-before-completion: evidence before success claims.git-pushing: commit and push only when explicitly requested.iterate-pr: follow GitHub checks until green.codebase-audit-pre-push: inspect diffs and side effects before pushing.
Non-negotiable rules
- Use
rtkfor all terminal commands. - Work from the repository root.
- Do not claim completion without fresh command output.
- Do not push, tag, release, or publish if any local gate fails.
- Keep changes surgical; do not refactor unrelated code.
- Inspect and revert unintended runtime/test mutations, especially
src/ffbb_mcp/acronyms_cache.json.
Required local gate before push/tag/release
Run the full gate, in this order:
- Version alignment:
rtk uv run python tools/check_version_alignment.py
- Formatting:
rtk uv run ruff format --check .
- Linting:
rtk uv run ruff check .
- Types:
rtk uv run mypy src
- Tests:
rtk uv run pytest
- Repository inspection:
rtk git status --short --branchrtk git diff --stat- targeted
rtk git diff -- ./pathfor changed files.
If version files changed, run rtk uv run python tools/sync_version.py, inspect the diff, then rerun the required local gate.
Push workflow
Only when the user explicitly asks to push or publish changes:
- Run the required local gate.
- Inspect staged and unstaged changes.
- Revert unrelated changes and generated side effects not intentionally part of the task.
- Commit with a conventional commit message.
- Push the branch.
- Inspect GitHub Actions after pushing:
rtk gh run list --limit 5- For failures, inspect only failed logs with
rtk gh run view <run-id> --log-failed.
- If CI fails, fix the root cause locally, rerun the relevant gate plus any affected tests, commit, push, and re-check CI.
Tag / release workflow
For a new tag or release:
- Confirm the intended version and that the tag does not already exist.
- Update
pyproject.tomland runrtk uv run python tools/sync_version.py. - Inspect synchronized files, especially:
README.mdCHANGELOG.mddocs/TOOLS_REFERENCE.mdwebsite/index.htmlwebsite/sitemap.xmlwebsite-docs/reference/tools.mduv.lock
- Run the required local gate.
- Commit release changes.
- Create an annotated tag.
- Push branch and tag.
- Inspect GitHub Actions until all relevant runs succeed.
CI-fix workflow
When GitHub Actions fail:
- Read the failed job logs before changing code.
- Identify the root cause, not just the check name.
- Make minimal fixes.
- Run the exact local check matching the failure, then the required gate if pushing.
- Push only after local evidence is clean.
- Follow CI until green, or report the blocker with the failing check and evidence.
Completion report
Final response must include only:
- Changed files.
- Validation commands that passed.
- Push/tag/CI status if applicable.
- Any remaining blocker or explicit risk.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

