agentleFS
nicholasglazernicholasglazer/gnosis-mcp/skills/tune/SKILL.md

tune

Skill30 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Find the chunk-size and retrieval config that maximizes quality on YOUR corpus. Sweeps chunk sizes, runs a golden-query set, reports nDCG / MRR / Hit@5. Use after first ingest or whenever your corpus changes shape significantly.

  • Reads credentials

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions5 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 5

    1. Necmttn/ax★ 116same name
    2. norrietaylor/distillery★ 25same name
    3. duthaho/skillhub★ 9same name
    4. ARCASSystems/FounderOS★ 7same name
    5. kim-do-yeon/Claude_skill★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Every RAG system has a distribution where it breaks.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    If multiple sizes tie at the top (plateau), pick the larger one — same quality, fewer chunks, faster ingest.

    line 91
  3. Distinctive:

    nDCG delta between keyword and hybrid: if < 0.02, your corpus is vocabulary-matched (queries share exact terms with docs).

    line 115
  4. Very specific:

    If you've been using gnosis-mcp for a while, real queries are already logged.

    line 133
  5. Very specific:

    After picking a chunk size and reranker/hybrid choice, persist it so every gnosis-mcp ingest (manual or via --watch) uses the tuned …

    line 151
  6. Very specific:

    After a new release of gnosis-mcp that touched chunking or fusion

    line 173

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Tune

Every RAG system has a distribution where it breaks. The only way to know whether gnosis-mcp's defaults are right for your corpus is to measure them against your queries. This skill runs that measurement.

Usage

/gnosis:tune                       # Quick sweep (5 chunk sizes, keyword mode)
/gnosis:tune full                  # Extended sweep (keyword + hybrid + rerank on/off)
/gnosis:tune --golden ./q.jsonl    # Use a specific golden-query file

Mode: $ARGUMENTS


Prerequisites

You need:

  1. A corpus — anywhere on disk. Will be passed to gnosis-mcp ingest.
  2. A golden-query file — one JSON object per line:

    {"query": "how does our auth work", "expected_paths": ["docs/auth", "architecture/auth"]}
    {"query": "stripe webhook failure runbook", "expected_paths": ["runbooks/stripe"]}

    expected_paths uses substring match against the returned file_path, case-insensitive. Generous enough that you don't need exact path memorization.

20 hand-written queries is enough to get signal. 50 is plenty.


Quick sweep (default)

Runs gnosis-mcp ingest 5 times with different chunk sizes, scoring each with your golden set. Keyword mode only (fast, no embedding cost).

# Default path if none given: ./docs + ./golden.jsonl
CORPUS=${CORPUS:-./docs}
GOLDEN=${GOLDEN:-./golden.jsonl}

for size in 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000; do
  uv run --with 'gnosis-mcp[embeddings] @ gnosis-mcp' \
    python tests/bench/bench_real_corpus.py \
      --corpus "$CORPUS" --golden "$GOLDEN" \
      --modes keyword --chunk-size $size \
      --out bench-results/tune-chunk${size}.json
done

(If gnosis-mcp was installed via pip rather than from source, invoke bench_real_corpus.py from the repo you cloned, and drop the uv run --with '... @ .' prefix.)

Expected runtime: 5–10 minutes per size on a typical laptop (ingest is the dominant cost; scoring itself is sub-second).

Output table:

chunk  chars │ nDCG@10 │ MRR    │ Hit@5  │ p95      │ ingest
────────────┼─────────┼────────┼────────┼──────────┼────────
       1000 │ 0.8557  │ 0.8067 │ 0.92   │ 30 ms    │ 592 s
       1500 │ 0.8529  │ 0.7967 │ 0.92   │  7 ms    │ 234 s
       2000 │ 0.8702  │ 0.7933 │ 0.92   │  7 ms    │ 210 s   ← peak
       2500 │ 0.8602  │ 0.7880 │ 0.92   │  7 ms    │ 195 s
       3000 │ 0.8459  │ 0.7880 │ 0.92   │  7 ms    │ 182 s

Pick the chunk size with the best nDCG@10 that doesn't blow your ingest-time budget. Persist it:

# In your shell profile / .env
export GNOSIS_MCP_CHUNK_SIZE=2000

If multiple sizes tie at the top (plateau), pick the larger one — same quality, fewer chunks, faster ingest.


Full sweep (full)

Adds hybrid mode and optional reranker A/B — ~30-40 minutes depending on corpus size and whether [reranking] is installed.

for size in 1500 2000 3000; do
  for mode in keyword hybrid hybrid+rerank; do
    uv run --with 'gnosis-mcp[embeddings,reranking] @ gnosis-mcp' \
      python tests/bench/bench_real_corpus.py \
        --corpus "$CORPUS" --golden "$GOLDEN" \
        --modes "$mode" --chunk-size $size \
        --out "bench-results/tune-${mode//+/_}-${size}.json"
  done
done

What to read from the output

  1. nDCG delta between keyword and hybrid: if < 0.02, your corpus is vocabulary-matched (queries share exact terms with docs). Dense retrieval adds latency without lift — leave hybrid off.
  2. nDCG delta when reranker is added: on dev docs specifically, we measure -27 nDCG (!). If you see a similar drop, your corpus has the same distribution problem — disable GNOSIS_MCP_RERANK_ENABLED. If it's +3-10 on your corpus, keep it on.
  3. Chunk-size peak location: tells you the typical topic-coherent block length in your corpus. API-reference-heavy corpora peak lower (1000-1500 chars). Long-form prose peaks higher (2500-3000).

Programmatic golden-set from existing access logs

If you've been using gnosis-mcp for a while, real queries are already logged. Generate a seed golden file from them:

sqlite3 ~/.local/share/gnosis-mcp/docs.db \
  "SELECT DISTINCT query FROM search_access_log
   WHERE timestamp > date('now', '-30 days')
   ORDER BY count(*) DESC LIMIT 30;" \
  | awk '{print "{\"query\":\""$0"\", \"expected_paths\": []}"}' > golden-seed.jsonl

Then fill in expected_paths by hand — 5 minutes of work, gives you a golden set grounded in how you actually use the system.


Automate the winner

After picking a chunk size and reranker/hybrid choice, persist it so every gnosis-mcp ingest (manual or via --watch) uses the tuned settings:

# Persistent across processes
export GNOSIS_MCP_CHUNK_SIZE=2000
export GNOSIS_MCP_RERANK_ENABLED=false  # if tune showed it hurts

# Re-ingest with the new config
gnosis-mcp ingest ./docs --embed --wipe

When to re-tune

  • Corpus grows 2× or more
  • You add a fundamentally different content type (e.g., API references added to a prose-only corpus, or vice versa)
  • You switch embedder (GNOSIS_MCP_EMBED_MODEL) — the semantic side of hybrid now behaves differently
  • After a new release of gnosis-mcp that touched chunking or fusion

Otherwise: tune once per year. It's not free but it's not frequent.


See also

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.