agentleFS
nic095laysonnic095layson/claude/.claude/skills/debugging-playbook/SKILL.md

debugging-playbook

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Symptom-to-fix triage playbook for this repo's known failure modes — load it the moment something is BROKEN and you need to know why. Use when the claude-council skill won't trigger in Claude Code or on claude.ai, triggers too eagerly, leaks its internal deliberation phases into visible output, produces a verdict over ~200 words or refuses to commit, shows an inflated/fake-looking vote tally, when an edit to SKILL.md doesn't show up in a session ("stale skill"), or when files.zip artifacts disagree with the working tree. Do NOT use for what-am-I-allowed-to-change questions (change-control), for the historical incident record (failure-archaeology), for shipping artifacts (release-and-packaging), for running behavioral evals (validation-and-evals), or for routinely CHECKING whether the zip matches the tree — that parity check is diagnostics-and-tooling's; come here only when a mismatch is already suspected of causing breakage.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.