implement
Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub
Implement a piece of work based on a spec or set of tickets.
191 other projects use a version of this, 67 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revisit-studies/studytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dz114879/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivredited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- miklschmidt/archboardedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ask-matt and resolving-merge-conflicts.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 91 projects that use this
GoogleSkillresolving-merge-conflicts
Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.
Also in 83 projects that use this
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 67
- mattpocock/skills★ 309k27% same
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40k40% same
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40k40% same
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13k27% same
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3k27% same
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9k27% same
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1k40% same
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 66740% same
- aws/graph-explorer★ 49040% same
- biersoeckli/QuickStack★ 36527% same
57 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 124
- foambubble/foam★ 17ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- meta-pytorch/OpenEnv★ 2.8ksame name
- huggingface/OpenEnv★ 2.8ksame name
- oxsecurity/megalinter★ 2.6ksame name
- pymc-labs/pymc-marketing★ 1.3ksame name
- adobe/S3Mock★ 1.2ksame name
- nodetool-ai/nodetool★ 615same name
- stevesolun/ctx★ 583same name
114 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository43 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ask-skillsSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- git-flowSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- implement-specSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- prototypeSkill
- researchSkill
- retroSkill
- setup-skillsSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- wizardSkill
- audit-repo-architectureSkill
- claude-handoffSkill
- i-have-adhdSkill
- loop-meSkill
- setup-ts-deep-modulesSkill
- writing-atomic-notesSkill
- writing-beatsSkill
- writing-flashcardsSkill
- writing-fragmentsSkill
- writing-polishSkill
- writing-shapeSkill
- git-guardrails-claude-codeSkill
- migrate-to-shoehornSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- dashboard-uiSkill
- docsSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Before writing code or tests, ALWAYS read the standards in docs/standards/ (or skills/engineering/setup-skills/references/standards/ if …
- Distinctive: line 31
Test observable behavior at the interface, avoiding implementation-coupled tests.
- Very specific: line 35
Run typechecking (tsc --noEmit or language equivalent) regularly during development.
- Distinctive: line 36
Run single test files frequently during slice iterations.
- Distinctive: line 37
Run the full project test suite once at the end before code review.
- Very specific: line 43
Standards Axis: Verify compliance with docs/standards/ and the code smell baseline.
- Distinctive: line 44
Spec Axis: Verify completeness against the ticket / formal spec without scope creep.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implement
Implement the work described by the user in the spec or tickets.
Process
1. Read Repository Standards
Before writing code or tests, ALWAYS read the standards in docs/standards/ (or skills/engineering/setup-skills/references/standards/ if uninitialized; run /setup-skills if missing):
docs/standards/code-comment-taxonomy.mddocs/standards/testing-and-fixtures.mddocs/standards/security-and-cryptography.mddocs/standards/concurrency-and-locking.mddocs/standards/api-design-and-error-handling.mddocs/standards/database-and-migrations.mddocs/standards/git-flow-and-pr-matrix.mdGLOSSARY.mdand ADRs underdocs/adr/(if present)
2. Drive TDD via Vertical Slices
Execute implementation test-first via /tdd at pre-agreed public seams:
- Work one vertical slice (tracer bullet) at a time: failing test (red) → minimal code (green) → clean refactor.
- Test observable behavior at the interface, avoiding implementation-coupled tests.
3. Continuous Verification
- Run typechecking (
tsc --noEmitor language equivalent) regularly during development. - Run single test files frequently during slice iterations.
- Run the full project test suite once at the end before code review.
4. Code Review Gate
Once implementation is complete, run /code-review to audit changes along both axes:
- Standards Axis: Verify compliance with
docs/standards/and the code smell baseline. - Spec Axis: Verify completeness against the ticket / formal spec without scope creep.
5. Atomic Conventional Commits
Format Conventional Commits using git-flow (node skills/engineering/git-flow/scripts/format-commit.mjs).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

