agentleFS
ngctongcto/oh-my-pstack/skills/swarm/SKILL.md

swarm

Skill1 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub

Fan out N parallel workers, drain them, and return one report. Use for /swarm, 'swarm this', or parallel coverage, races, gauntlets, and exploration.

87 other projects use a version of this, 45 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use poteto-help, make-bot-ui and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ianclearySkill

    poteto-help

    Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • eryzerzSkill

    make-bot-ui

    Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • tristanphvnSkill

    ketchup-video

    Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 83 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When a worker must start from a non-default branch, name the branch in its brief and have it check that branch out first.

    line 32
  2. Distinctive:

    If a worker drops out, proceed with N-1 and note it.

    line 38
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep a compact result table, one-line evidenced issues, and explicit gaps or dropouts.

    line 44

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 83 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Swarm

Fan out N parallel workers. They may cover separate slices, race the same brief, or mix both. The parent waits, aggregates, and returns one report.

Start

Open a todo list with one entry per phase before launching anything.

  1. Frame
  2. Fan out
  3. Aggregate
  4. Report

Phase A: Frame

  1. State the done predicate and the artifact or report the swarm must return.
  2. Choose the shape. Partition into slices, race N workers on identical briefs, or mix both. For a race or mixed shape, declare first pass, rank all, or best-of before spawning.
  3. Set N from the user or derive it from the shape. N is total workers, not the concurrency limit.
  4. Pick the worker model with pstack_models role swarm-workers (default @task). If the tool is absent, read rule://pstack-models for the swarm-workers line and use the default. Pass each returned selector as the task item's model. If a selector is rejected, use the default and say so. For a model race, name each arm's model up front.
  5. Give each worker its own writable output when it writes. When workers verify or measure commits, each brief names the exact SHAs. A measurement brief also names the method (sample count, what one sample is, order). The worker records both in its result.

Phase B: Fan out

Spawn all N workers in one task batch, or push them into an eval workpool when N is large or results should stream back. Use agent task for writers, and scout or reviewer for read-only verification lanes. Pass the step 4 model. Writers that might collide set isolated: true so each gets its own git worktree. That flag only exists when task.isolation.enabled is on (default off; see the setup-pstack skill), and with task.isolation.apply on (the default once isolation is enabled) successful worktree changes are applied back to the parent checkout. When isolation is off, create the worktrees yourself with /wt, or run one writer at a time.

When a worker must start from a non-default branch, name the branch in its brief and have it check that branch out first.

When the swarm verifies a PR, the two thermo lenses are mandatory lanes, run through the thermos skill: agents thermo-review and thermo-quality, scoped to the same diff, launched as items of one task call with heterogeneous agent values (not a workpool, which would drop their structured output). The swarm's own lanes are the coverage-matrix, race, and gauntlet lanes. The thermo lanes never substitute for them and they never substitute for the thermo lanes.

Every brief stands alone. Include the goal, scope, exact slice or race arm, how to verify, and what to report. Reports use PASS, ISSUES, or BLOCKED with evidence. A worker that can prove a defect reports ISSUES and lists every issue it can prove, not only the first.

If a worker drops out, proceed with N-1 and note it.

Phase C: Aggregate

Read the terminal results. Drop a result that does not record the SHAs and method its brief names, and respawn that worker once. After a second miss, record a gap. A gap does not count as a pass. For coverage, every required slice needs a result. For a race, apply the selection rule declared up front. Use first pass, rank all, or best-of. Do not paste raw worker dumps.

Keep a compact result table, one-line evidenced issues, and explicit gaps or dropouts.

Phase D: Report

Return one consolidated in-chat report with the table, issue one-liners, gaps or dropouts, and the race rule when used.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.