epic-create
Skill11 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Protocol for authoring an Epic body and sub-ticket links; use before creating a parent issue labeled epic via create_issue or decomposing one into sub-tickets.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- architecture-pre-flightSkill
- blocked-task-stateSkill
- blog-postSkill
- context-recoverySkill
- create-skillSkill
- design-sweepSkill
- epic-resolutionSkill
- epic-reviewSkill
- goal-scopingSkill
- guide-authoringSkill
- hostile-content-quarantineSkill
- ideation-sandboxSkill
- identity-firewallSkill
- industry-friction-radarSkill
- lane-intentSkill
- lead-roleSkill
- memory-miningSkill
- neo-app-authoringSkill
- neo-identity-updateSkill
- neural-linkSkill
- overviewSkill
- peer-namingSkill
- peer-roleSkill
- post-review-pickupSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- pull-requestSkill
- release-notesSkill
- self-repairSkill
- session-sunsetSkill
- structural-pre-flightSkill
- tech-debt-radarSkill
- ticket-createSkill
- ticket-intakeSkill
- ticket-triageSkill
- turn-memory-pre-flightSkill
- unit-testSkill
- update-roadmapSkill
- video-createSkill
- whitebox-e2eSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 6
If you are about to author an Epic (a parent issue labeled epic) or decompose one into sub-tickets, you MUST immediately use the view_file …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Epic Create Skill
If you are about to author an Epic (a parent issue labeled epic) or decompose one into sub-tickets, you MUST immediately use the view_file tool to read and strictly adhere to .agents/skills/epic-create/references/epic-create-workflow.md before proceeding.
What it enforces
Creation-side dual of ticket-create + entry partner of epic-review/epic-resolution: epic body = problem-scope + intended-solution (NOT pseudo-subs / ACs); ACs live in SUB tickets linked via update_issue_relationship and added incrementally; the body MUST NOT hardcode a sub-list (it stales out → FAIL).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.