docs-update
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Update Cognivia documentation from verified implementation and current-session evidence. Use for README, architecture, validation, status, reviewer, or future-work documentation after implementation changes. Do not use for product prompt edits, speculative roadmap writing, code changes, generated handoffs, or claims that cannot be verified.
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- microsoft/veronatheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- buildomator/buildomatortheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- aka-kika/akakika-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- harukikuri/spotnotetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- jellydn/my-ai-toolstheir own version, first seen Oct 18, 2026
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- microsoft/verona★ 3.7ksame name
- warpdotdev/oz-skills★ 825same name
- bagofwords1/bagofwords★ 463same name
- hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet★ 128same name
- jellydn/my-ai-tools★ 127same name
- TangleML/tangle-ui★ 104same name
- buildomator/buildomator★ 102same name
- harukikuri/spotnote★ 25same name
- aka-kika/akakika-skills★ 11same name
- Escoto/RustifyMyClaw★ 8same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architecture-auditSkill
- commit-reviewSkill
- cxpSkill
- safe-refactorSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- task-briefSkill
- cxpSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use when a maintained repository document must be synchronized with verified code, tests, runtime evidence, or an approved migration state.
- Distinctive: line 20
Do not use for product prompts, code comments, automatic handoff reports, historical rewrites, marketing copy, or unverified future …
- Distinctive: line 33
Read the target document and the evidence that owns each affected claim.
- Distinctive: line 50
Never invent implementation, test results, readiness, provider behavior, or security guarantees.
- Distinctive: line 52
Never treat agent documentation as product-domain evidence.
- Distinctive: line 53
Do not expose secrets, environment values, private URLs, or raw logs.
- Distinctive: line 54
Do not modify product code, tests, or unrelated documents through this skill.
- Distinctive: line 55
Do not silently rewrite an authoritative audit or historical source.
- Distinctive: line 59
Verify every changed factual claim against its owning source.
- Distinctive: line 60
Check local links and literal repository paths.
- Distinctive: line 61
Run git diff --check and review the documentation diff.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Docs Update
Purpose
Make documentation accurately describe current implementation, evidence, limitations, and pending work without inventing features or validation.
Trigger
Use when a maintained repository document must be synchronized with verified code, tests, runtime evidence, or an approved migration state.
Do not trigger
Do not use for product prompts, code comments, automatic handoff reports, historical rewrites, marketing copy, or unverified future architecture.
Inputs
- Target document, audience, and requested scope.
- Current code or configuration evidence.
- Tests and commands actually run in the current session.
- Manual or browser checks actually performed.
- Known limitations and explicitly planned work.
Workflow
- Read the target document and the evidence that owns each affected claim.
- Classify claims as implemented, tested, manually verified, pending, or unverified using evidence language.
- Identify stale, ambiguous, historical, or marketing-heavy wording.
- Edit only the requested sections and preserve historical evidence unless the task explicitly changes its status or ownership.
- Separate current functionality, current limitations, and future work.
- Review links, paths, commands, dates, and validation claims.
Outputs
Return the documents and sections changed, the evidence used, claims still pending verification, validation performed, and any intentionally preserved historical wording.
Safety
- Never invent implementation, test results, readiness, provider behavior, or security guarantees.
- Never treat agent documentation as product-domain evidence.
- Do not expose secrets, environment values, private URLs, or raw logs.
- Do not modify product code, tests, or unrelated documents through this skill.
- Do not silently rewrite an authoritative audit or historical source.
Validation
- Verify every changed factual claim against its owning source.
- Check local links and literal repository paths.
- Run
git diff --checkand review the documentation diff. - State clearly which product tests, if any, were not required for a docs-only change.
References
AGENTS.md— evidence and documentation rules.docs/agents/README.md— agent-tooling facts.- Evidence language — canonical claim status definitions for this skill.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

