prompt-improver
Skill86 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Optimize prompts for better AI responses. Use when user asks to improve a prompt, refine a prompt, make a prompt better, optimize prompting, "Aristotelian", "first principles", or "proof-based" , review their prompt, or says "/improve-prompt". Transforms vague requests into clear, specific, actionable, logic-based prompts.
11 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- KalastajaM/Cluidetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zedarvates/frugal-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- No1Hoo/prompt-improver-skilltheir own version, first seen Sep 14, 2026
- Amery2010/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 9, 2026
- davekilleen/Dextheir own version, first seen Aug 31, 2026
- d3v0psdan/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 19, 2026
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- happycapy-ai/Happycapy-skills★ 13763% same
Wrote their own version · 10
- severity1/claude-code-prompt-improver★ 1.9ksame name
- davekilleen/Dex★ 509same name
- dazuck/operator-skills★ 17same name
- Amery2010/skills★ 4same name
- KalastajaM/Cluide★ 2same name
- dazuck/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- zedarvates/frugal-skills★ 1same name
- d3v0psdan/claude-skills★ 0same name
- kakarot-oncloud/claude-skills★ 0same name
- No1Hoo/prompt-improver-skill★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Gather context: - Use AskUserQuestion as many times as needed to resolve any doubts or assumptions
- Distinctive: line 20
Refine: - Ask if user wants adjustments
- Distinctive: line 24
Always actived. produce a prompt that instructs the receiving LLM to reason from first principles when executing the task.
- Distinctive: line 28
Gather context from user: - Ask what system capabilities, tools, and constraints exist.
- Distinctive: line 35
Verify the result against the axioms at the end
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prompt Improver
Transform vague prompts into clear, specific, actionable ones for better AI responses.
Workflow
- Gather context - Use AskUserQuestion as many times as needed to resolve any doubts or assumptions
- Analyze - Identify what's unclear, missing, or ambiguous
- Improve - Apply the Aristotelian framework
- Present - Show improved prompt with key changes explained
- Refine - Ask if user wants adjustments
Aristotelian Mode (First Principles)
Always actived. produce a prompt that instructs the receiving LLM to reason from first principles when executing the task.
The prompt-improver does NOT do the Aristotelian reasoning itself. It crafts a prompt that tells the LLM to:
- Gather context from user - Ask what system capabilities, tools, and constraints exist. Bake known context (root access, AI model, available tools, domain) directly into the prompt as given axioms.
- Embed the reasoning directive - The improved prompt tells the LLM to:
- Identify the atomic, irreducible truths of the task before acting
- Interrogate each truth: "Can this be decomposed further? If removed, does the task break? Does it contradict anything?"
- Discard anything that is not strictly necessary
- Build the solution deductively, where every action traces to a stated axiom
- Verify the result against the axioms at the end
- Structure the output prompt with these sections:
REASONING DIRECTIVE: [Instruct the LLM to use first-principles reasoning] GIVEN AXIOMS: [Known truths about system, capabilities, domain -- baked in] TASK: [What to accomplish] METHOD: [Tell LLM to discover task-specific axioms, interrogate them, then build deductively] VERIFICATION: [Tell LLM to check its result against its axioms]
Output format for Aristotelian mode:
## Analysis
[What context was embedded and why]
## Improved Prompt (Aristotelian)
[The complete prompt with reasoning directive, given axioms, task, method, and verification]
## What This Prompt Does
- Tells the LLM to [specific reasoning behavior]
- Bakes in [specific context] so the LLM does not hallucinate itSee references/aristotelian.md for the full methodology and prompt structure.
References
- Aristotelian mode: See references/aristotelian.md for the proof-based first principles methodology
- Examples: See references/examples.md for before/after transformations
- Anti-patterns: See references/anti-patterns.md for common issues to fix
- Framework details: See references/framework.md for the 6-principle improvement framework
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

