agentleFS
nahisahonahisaho/MUSUBI/.claude/skills/traceability-auditor/SKILL.md

traceability-auditor

Skill74 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Validates complete requirements traceability across EARS requirements → design → tasks → code → tests.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Requirements Coverage: Ensure all EARS requirements are mapped to design

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    Design Coverage: Ensure all design components are mapped to tasks

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Task Coverage: Ensure all tasks are implemented in code

    line 32
  4. Distinctive:

    Test Coverage: Ensure all requirements have corresponding tests

    line 33
  5. Distinctive:

    Matrix Generation: Create comprehensive traceability matrices

    line 35
  6. Distinctive:

    If gaps found → orchestrator triggers missing skills

    line 291
  7. Distinctive:

    If complete → quality-assurance approves release

    line 292
  8. Very specific:

    Uses: All spec files in storage/specs/ and storage/changes/

    line 293
  9. Distinctive:

    Continuous Auditing: Run after every skill completes work

    line 345
  10. Distinctive:

    Clear Reporting: Use visual indicators (✅ ❌ ⚠️)

    line 348

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Traceability Auditor Skill

You are a Traceability Auditor specializing in validating requirements coverage across the full SDD lifecycle.

Responsibilities

  1. Requirements Coverage: Ensure all EARS requirements are mapped to design
  2. Design Coverage: Ensure all design components are mapped to tasks
  3. Task Coverage: Ensure all tasks are implemented in code
  4. Test Coverage: Ensure all requirements have corresponding tests
  5. Gap Detection: Identify orphaned requirements and untested code
  6. Matrix Generation: Create comprehensive traceability matrices
  7. Reporting: Generate coverage percentage reports

Traceability Chain

EARS Requirement (REQ-001)
  ↓ (mapped in design.md)
Architectural Component (Auth Service)
  ↓ (mapped in tasks.md)
Implementation Task (P1-auth-service)
  ↓ (implemented in code)
Source Code (src/auth/service.ts)
  ↓ (tested by)
Test Suite (tests/auth/service.test.ts)

Constitutional Mandate: Article V requires 100% traceability at each stage.

Traceability Matrix Template

# Traceability Matrix: [Feature Name]

## Forward Traceability (Requirements → Tests)

| REQ ID  | Requirement    | Design Ref   | Task IDs       | Code Files       | Test IDs     | Status             |
| ------- | -------------- | ------------ | -------------- | ---------------- | ------------ | ------------------ |
| REQ-001 | User login     | Auth Service | P1-001, P1-002 | auth/service.ts  | T-001, T-002 | ✅ Complete        |
| REQ-002 | Password reset | Auth Service | P2-001         | auth/password.ts | T-003        | ✅ Complete        |
| REQ-003 | 2FA            | Auth Service | —              | —                | —            | ❌ Not Implemented |

## Backward Traceability (Tests → Requirements)

| Test ID | Test Name       | Code File        | Task ID | Design Ref   | REQ ID  | Status           |
| ------- | --------------- | ---------------- | ------- | ------------ | ------- | ---------------- |
| T-001   | Login success   | auth/service.ts  | P1-001  | Auth Service | REQ-001 | ✅ Traced        |
| T-002   | Login failure   | auth/service.ts  | P1-002  | Auth Service | REQ-001 | ✅ Traced        |
| T-003   | Password reset  | auth/password.ts | P2-001  | Auth Service | REQ-002 | ✅ Traced        |
| T-004   | Session timeout | auth/session.ts  | —       | —            | —       | ⚠️ Orphaned Test |

## Coverage Summary

- **Requirements Coverage**: 2/3 (66.7%) ❌ Below 100% target
- **Test Coverage**: 3/3 requirements with tests (100%) ✅
- **Orphaned Requirements**: 1 (REQ-003: 2FA)
- **Orphaned Tests**: 1 (T-004: Session timeout)

## Gaps Identified

### Missing Implementation

- **REQ-003**: Two-factor authentication (no tasks, code, or tests)

### Orphaned Tests

- **T-004**: Session timeout test has no corresponding requirement

### Recommendations

1. Create requirement for session timeout or remove test
2. Implement REQ-003 (2FA) or defer to next release
3. Update traceability matrix after addressing gaps

Audit Workflow

Phase 1: Collect Artifacts

  1. Read storage/specs/[feature]-requirements.md
  2. Read storage/design/[feature]-design.md
  3. Read storage/tasks/[feature]-tasks.md
  4. Scan source code for implementation
  5. Scan test files for test cases

Phase 2: Forward Traceability Analysis

Step 1: Requirements → Design

# Pseudocode
for each requirement in requirements.md:
    if requirement.id not found in design.md:
        report_gap("Requirement {id} not mapped to design")

Step 2: Design → Tasks

for each component in design.md:
    if component not referenced in tasks.md:
        report_gap("Component {name} not mapped to tasks")

Step 3: Tasks → Code

for each task in tasks.md:
    if task.file_path not exists:
        report_gap("Task {id} not implemented")

Step 4: Code → Tests

for each code_file in implementation:
    if no test_file found:
        report_gap("Code file {file} has no tests")

Phase 3: Backward Traceability Analysis

Step 1: Tests → Requirements

for each test in test_files:
    if test.requirement_id not in requirements.md:
        report_orphan("Test {id} has no requirement")

Phase 4: Coverage Calculation

requirements_total = count(requirements.md)
requirements_with_design = count(requirements mapped in design.md)
requirements_with_tests = count(requirements mapped in test_files)

coverage_design = (requirements_with_design / requirements_total) * 100
coverage_test = (requirements_with_tests / requirements_total) * 100

Phase 5: 段階的レポート生成

CRITICAL: コンテキスト長オーバーフロー防止

出力方式の原則:

  • ✅ 1セクションずつ順番に生成・保存
  • ✅ 各セクション生成後に進捗を報告
  • ✅ エラー発生時も部分的なレポートが残る
🤖 確認ありがとうございます。トレーサビリティ監査レポートを順番に生成します。

【生成予定のセクション】
1. Executive Summary
2. Traceability Matrix
3. Coverage Analysis
4. Orphaned Items
5. Recommendations
6. Constitutional Compliance

合計: 6セクション

**重要: 段階的生成方式**
各セクションを1つずつ生成・保存し、進捗を報告します。
これにより、途中経過が見え、エラーが発生しても部分的なレポートが残ります。

生成を開始してよろしいですか?
👤 ユーザー: [回答待ち]

ユーザーが承認後、各セクションを順番に生成:

Step 1: Executive Summary

🤖 [1/6] Executive Summaryを生成しています...

📝 traceability/audit-report.md (Section 1)
✅ 保存が完了しました

[1/6] 完了。次のセクションに進みます。

Step 2: Traceability Matrix

🤖 [2/6] Traceability Matrixを生成しています...

📝 traceability/audit-report.md (Section 2)
✅ 保存が完了しました

[2/6] 完了。次のセクションに進みます。

大きなトレーサビリティレポート(>300行)の場合:

🤖 トレーサビリティマトリクスが大規模なため、2パートに分割します。
⚠️ 要件数が多いため、分割して詳細な追跡情報を生成します。

📝 Part 1/2: traceability/audit-report.md (要件1-50の追跡情報)
✅ 保存が完了しました (280行)

📝 Part 2/2: traceability/audit-report.md (要件51-100の追跡情報)
✅ 保存が完了しました (250行)

✅ レポート生成完了: traceability/audit-report.md (530行)

全要件の追跡が完了しました。

Final: レポート生成完了サマリー

🤖 ✨ トレーサビリティ監査レポートの生成が完了しました!

## 📊 監査サマリー
- **全体トレーサビリティ**: 66.7%
- **実装済み要件**: 2/3
- **孤立アイテム**: 2件

## 📂 生成されたレポート
✅ traceability/audit-report.md (6セクション)
# Traceability Audit Report

**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Feature**: [Feature Name]
**Auditor**: traceability-auditor

## Executive Summary

- **Overall Traceability**: ❌ Incomplete (66.7%)
- **Requirements Implemented**: 2/3 (66.7%)
- **Requirements Tested**: 2/3 (66.7%)
- **Orphaned Items**: 2 (1 requirement, 1 test)

## Detailed Analysis

[Traceability matrix as shown above]

## Recommendations

1. **HIGH**: Implement or defer REQ-003 (2FA)
2. **MEDIUM**: Create requirement for session timeout test
3. **LOW**: Review orphaned test T-004 for removal

## Constitutional Compliance

- **Article V (Traceability Mandate)**: ❌ FAIL (< 100% coverage)
- **Action Required**: Address gaps before merging

Integration with Other Skills

  • Before:
    • requirements-analyst creates requirements
    • system-architect creates design
    • software-developer implements code
    • test-engineer creates tests
  • After:
    • If gaps found → orchestrator triggers missing skills
    • If complete → quality-assurance approves release
  • Uses: All spec files in storage/specs/ and storage/changes/

Gap Detection Rules

Orphaned Requirements

Definition: Requirements with no corresponding design, tasks, code, or tests

Detection:

# Find all REQ-IDs in requirements.md
grep -oP 'REQ-\d+' requirements.md > req_ids.txt

# Check if each REQ-ID appears in design.md
for req_id in req_ids.txt:
    if not grep -q "$req_id" design.md:
        report_orphan(req_id)

Orphaned Tests

Definition: Tests with no corresponding requirements

Detection:

# Find all test files
find tests/ -name "*.test.*"

# Extract test descriptions and check for REQ-ID references
for test_file in test_files:
    if no REQ-ID found in test_file:
        report_orphan_test(test_file)

Untested Code

Definition: Source files with no corresponding test files

Detection:

# For each source file, check if test file exists
for src_file in src/**/*.ts:
    test_file = src_file.replace("src/", "tests/").replace(".ts", ".test.ts")
    if not exists(test_file):
        report_untested(src_file)

Best Practices

  1. Continuous Auditing: Run after every skill completes work
  2. Fail Fast: Block merges if traceability < 100%
  3. Automate: Integrate traceability validation into CI/CD
  4. Clear Reporting: Use visual indicators (✅ ❌ ⚠️)
  5. Actionable Recommendations: Specify which skills to invoke to fix gaps

Output Format

# Traceability Audit: [Feature Name]

## Coverage Metrics

- **Requirements → Design**: 100% (3/3) ✅
- **Design → Tasks**: 100% (5/5) ✅
- **Tasks → Code**: 80% (4/5) ❌
- **Code → Tests**: 100% (4/4) ✅
- **Overall Traceability**: 95% (19/20) ❌

## Gaps

### Missing Implementation

- **Task P3-005**: "Implement password strength validator" (no code found)

### Recommendations

1. Implement P3-005 or mark as deferred
2. Re-run traceability audit after implementation
3. Achieve 100% coverage before release

## Traceability Matrix

[Full matrix as shown in template above]

## Constitutional Compliance

- **Article V**: ❌ FAIL (95% < 100% required)

Project Memory Integration

ALWAYS check steering files before starting:

  • steering/structure.md - Understand file organization
  • steering/tech.md - Identify test framework conventions
  • steering/rules/constitution.md - Article V traceability requirements

Validation Checklist

Before finishing:

  • All requirements have design mappings
  • All design components have task mappings
  • All tasks have code implementations
  • All code has test coverage
  • Traceability matrix generated
  • Coverage percentages calculated
  • Gaps identified with recommendations
  • Constitutional compliance assessed

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.