agentleFS
nagi-studionagi-studio/skills/skills/rookie/architect/SKILL.md

architect

Skill470 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

技术选型(tech stack):需求清楚之后,比较两三套方案并推荐一套。用于新项目选框架、数据库、托管和部署方式,或用户问「用什么技术做」「怎么部署」、which stack、how to host。

174 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ecosystem-reference, fractal-delegation and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • naman10parikhSkill

    ecosystem-reference

    Quick-access directory of Claude Code ecosystem repos, skills, plugins, MCPs, and patterns. Use when improving the harness.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • naman10parikhSkill

    fractal-delegation

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • tristanphvnSkill

    ketchup-video

    Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • jaydubya818Skill

    figure-it-out

    Use when novel or multi-phase work needs an auditable workflow and no narrower playbook fits.

    Also in 55 projects that use this

  • ianclearySkill

    principle-explain-the-number

    Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.

    Also in 29 projects that use this

  • eryzerzSkill

    make-bot-ui

    Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.

    Also in 20 projects that use this

  • +6 more from naman10parikh

The file

Files
SKILL.md

先读需求:docs/decisions-*.md,以及本次对话里已经定下的结论。从中取出下列约束;缺的、且会改变选型的,问一轮(每个问题写 ❓ Q1|标题、问题、➡️ 建议)。

  • 使用地区:中国大陆、海外,还是都有
  • 平台和规模:网页 / 手机 / 桌面;多少人用,会不会涨
  • 数据:要不要登录、同步、多人协作;放本地还是云端
  • 用户能亲手维护什么:按经历问(部署过网站?管过数据库?用过环境变量?),不问自评
  • 预算和硬约束:持续成本、指定服务、网络、合规

措辞跟着用户的水平走,从他们的回答里随时调整:对新手,每个术语第一次出现时附一句白话。

价格、免费额度、地区可用性、官方支持情况,现查官方页面并附链接;记忆里的数字常常过时。

需求里有成熟的库或现成服务能解决的部分,方案里直接用,不自己写。「成熟」看三点:和需求对得上、有测试、有人持续维护。也要防供应链风险:优先选有可靠背书的(知名公司、基金会或团队维护,用的人多),包名核对清楚,来路不明的小包不装。在开源自建和托管服务之间,选用户维护得了的那个。

给两到三套方案,按「成熟稳妥的技术(boring technology)」排序:第一套是用户管得过来的最简单方案。每套写:

### 方案 A:一句话名字
- 技术栈:
- 为什么适合:
- 开发难度 / 维护成本:
- 目标地区能否顺利使用:
- 你得自己管的东西:密钥放哪、权限规则、要打补丁的服务器;没有就写「无」
- 主要风险:

最后写「推荐:方案 X」和起决定作用的那条理由,再列仍会改变推荐的待定问题(没有就写「无」)。

用户选定后,把方案和理由追加进 decisions 文件(没有就新建 docs/decisions-<英文主题>.md;不能写文件就输出可复制的 Markdown)。

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.