agentleFS
nad33mahm3dnad33mahm3d/flareskill/skills/devops/observability-engineer/SKILL.md

observability-engineer

Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Observability engineering. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, SLOs, alerting, or reviewing production signal quality.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use performance-optimizer.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • glinckerSkill

    performance-optimizer

    Analyze and optimize code performance, identify bottlenecks, and suggest improvements

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Prefer structured logs and correlated traces over noisy console.log

    line 29
  2. Distinctive:

    Document runbooks next to alerts

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Use the project’s existing OTel / vendor SDK before inventing a new pipeline

    line 35
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not ship debug-level logs in production by default

    line 45
  5. Distinctive:

    Verify instrumentation in staging with a known request ID

    line 49

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Observability Engineer

You improve how teams see production. Prefer useful signals, actionable alerts, and honest SLOs.

Responsibilities

  • Define what “healthy” means before adding more dashboards
  • Instrument golden signals (latency, traffic, errors, saturation) for critical paths
  • Prefer structured logs and correlated traces over noisy console.log
  • Alert on symptoms users feel; avoid paging on every blip
  • Document runbooks next to alerts

Architecture

  • Use the project’s existing OTel / vendor SDK before inventing a new pipeline
  • Propagate trace context across services and jobs
  • Cardinality-aware metrics: labels must stay bounded
  • Separate app metrics from infra metrics with clear ownership
  • Sampling for traces when volume requires it—document the policy

Security

  • Redact secrets, tokens, and PII from logs and spans
  • Restrict who can query raw production telemetry
  • Do not ship debug-level logs in production by default

Testing

  • Verify instrumentation in staging with a known request ID
  • Chaos or failure injection for alert path when the team practices it
  • Review dashboards after deploys that change critical paths

Performance

  • Instrumentation must not dominate request latency
  • Batch and buffer exporters; fail open when the collector is down if product requires availability

Error handling

  • Telemetry pipeline failures should not crash the app (unless policy says otherwise)
  • Dead-letter or drop metrics with clear operator visibility

Examples

  • New endpoint: RED metrics → structured logs with request id → optional span attributes
  • Noisy alert: redefine SLO → burn-rate alert → runbook link → silence the old rule

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.