project-release-maintainer
Skill4 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Project overlay for release and packaging maintenance across install layout, shipped assets, automation, license and notice alignment, and release docs. Not for content-only documentation or publishing without explicit authorization.
In this repository47 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agentic-sdlc-improvementSkill
- agentic-sdlcSkill
- agent-skill-generatorSkill
- agents-md-generatorSkill
- backend-guidanceSkill
- backend-systems-guidanceSkill
- bounded-delegationSkill
- chrome-devtools-axiSkill
- coding-guidance-bashSkill
- coding-guidance-cppSkill
- coding-guidance-goSkill
- coding-guidance-go-tuiSkill
- coding-guidance-pythonSkill
- coding-guidance-qtSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- deepseek-harnessSkill
- design-md-authorSkill
- development-contract-processSkill
- development-contract-repo-overlay-templateSkill
- development-contract-systemSkill
- documenter-coauthoringSkill
- documenterSkill
- dream-thinkingSkill
- fuse-skillsSkill
- godotSkill
- go-testing-with-testifySkill
- jekyllSkill
- lighthouseSkill
- playwright-testingSkill
- project-config-and-testsSkill
- project-core-devSkill
- project-platform-diagnoseSkill
- project-vendor-boundarySkill
- prompt-engineeringSkill
- recursive-thinkingSkill
- security-identity-accessSkill
- securitySkill
- setup-playwrightSkill
- story-clarifierSkill
- story-implementation-plannerSkill
- story-repo-scoutSkill
- story-to-plan-orchestratorSkill
- tester-mindsetSkill
- thinkingSkill
- ui-design-guidanceSkill
- ui-guidanceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Use documenter alone for content-only edits that do not require reconciliation with shipped artifacts.
- Distinctive: line 41
Use the repo's existing dry-run, package-listing, hygiene, and verification commands.
- Distinctive: line 47
Keep documentation concise and grounded in the shipped build.
- Distinctive: line 51
Treat tagging, publishing, uploading, signing, credential use, and creating an external release as separate consequential actions that …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Release Maintainer
This is a composable project overlay. Add matching implementation guidance when
source, build, or automation code changes. Compose with documenter when the
main artifact is durable release, install, or contributor documentation.
For review or planning, inspect and report without changing package contents, manifests, notices, or release state. Apply the workflow as edit instructions only when the user asks for those changes.
When to use
The change affects the shipped or published contract: package contents, install rules, release automation, shipped assets, license and notice files, release checklists, or documentation that must match those artifacts.
Not for
Use documenter alone for content-only edits that do not require reconciliation
with shipped artifacts. For internal code changes with no release impact, use
the matching principle skill and add project-core-dev only when repository-
specific completion evidence is not concrete. Use project-config-and-tests
for config contracts. Use project-vendor-boundary as primary for vendored
source ownership, and compose both overlays when a vendor change also alters
shipped metadata.
Workflow
- Inventory the existing release contract from package manifests, install rules, shipped assets, release automation, license and notice files, checklists, and public documentation. Identify the source of truth before editing.
- Trace the requested change across only the affected artifacts. Keep package contents, install behavior, public commands, examples, and release notes mutually consistent.
- Use the repo's existing dry-run, package-listing, hygiene, and verification commands. When install behavior changes, validate in a temporary install tree and clean it up; smoke-test the installed artifact when practical.
- Inspect the produced package or staged tree rather than inferring contents from build configuration alone. Report unavailable signing, platform, or publication checks instead of implying they passed.
- Keep documentation concise and grounded in the shipped build. Do not invent CI, packaging, signing, publishing, or release workflows that the repo does not contain or the user did not request.
Treat tagging, publishing, uploading, signing, credential use, and creating an external release as separate consequential actions that require explicit authorization. Limit license work to keeping declared license and notice files consistent; do not make legal compatibility claims or change project licensing without explicit direction.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

