secure-code-guardian
Skill1 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when implementing authentication/authorization, securing user input, or preventing OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities — including custom security implementations such as hashing passwords with bcrypt/argon2, sanitizing SQL queries with parameterized statements, configuring CORS/CSP headers, validating input with Zod, and setting up JWT tokens. Invoke for authentication, authorization, input validation, encryption, OWASP Top 10 prevention, secure session management, and security hardening. For pre-built OAuth/SSO integrations or standalone security audits, consider a more specialized skill.
- Reads credentials
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
6
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 28
After each implementation step, verify:
- Common: line 30
Authentication: Test brute-force protection (lockout/rate limit triggers), session fixation resistance, token expiration, and …
- Common: line 31
Authorization: Verify horizontal and vertical privilege escalation paths are blocked.
- Common: line 51
Use parameterized queries (never string-interpolated SQL)
- Common: line 62
Use weak or deprecated algorithms (MD5, SHA-1, DES, ECB mode)
- Common: line 183
When implementing security features, provide:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Secure Code Guardian
Core Workflow
- Threat model — Identify attack surface and threats
- Design — Plan security controls
- Implement — Write secure code with defense in depth; see code examples below
- Validate — Test security controls with explicit checkpoints (see below)
- Document — Record security decisions
Validation Checkpoints
After each implementation step, verify:
- Authentication: Test brute-force protection (lockout/rate limit triggers), session fixation resistance, token expiration, and invalid-credential error messages (must not leak user existence).
- Authorization: Verify horizontal and vertical privilege escalation paths are blocked; test with tokens belonging to different roles/users.
- Input handling: Confirm SQL injection payloads (
' OR 1=1--) are rejected; confirm XSS payloads (<script>alert(1)</script>) are escaped or rejected. - Headers/CORS: Validate with a security scanner (e.g.,
curl -I, Mozilla Observatory) that security headers are present and CORS origin allowlist is correct.
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
| OWASP | references/owasp-prevention.md | OWASP Top 10 patterns |
| Authentication | references/authentication.md | Password hashing, JWT |
| Input Validation | references/input-validation.md | Zod, SQL injection |
| XSS/CSRF | references/xss-csrf.md | XSS prevention, CSRF |
| Headers | references/security-headers.md | Helmet, rate limiting |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Hash passwords with bcrypt/argon2 (never MD5/SHA-1/unsalted hashes)
- Use parameterized queries (never string-interpolated SQL)
- Validate and sanitize all user input before use
- Implement rate limiting on auth endpoints
- Set security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options)
- Log security events (failed auth, privilege escalation attempts)
- Store secrets in environment variables or secret managers (never in source code)
MUST NOT DO
- Store passwords in plaintext or reversibly encrypted form
- Trust user input without validation
- Expose sensitive data in logs or error responses
- Use weak or deprecated algorithms (MD5, SHA-1, DES, ECB mode)
- Hardcode secrets or credentials in code
Code Examples
Password Hashing (bcrypt)
import bcrypt from 'bcrypt';
const SALT_ROUNDS = 12; // minimum 10; 12 balances security and performance
export async function hashPassword(plaintext: string): Promise<string> {
return bcrypt.hash(plaintext, SALT_ROUNDS);
}
export async function verifyPassword(plaintext: string, hash: string): Promise<boolean> {
return bcrypt.compare(plaintext, hash);
}Parameterized SQL Query (Node.js / pg)
// NEVER: `SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${email}'`
// ALWAYS: use positional parameters
import { Pool } from 'pg';
const pool = new Pool();
export async function getUserByEmail(email: string) {
const { rows } = await pool.query(
'SELECT id, email, role FROM users WHERE email = $1',
[email] // value passed separately — never interpolated
);
return rows[0] ?? null;
}Input Validation with Zod
import { z } from 'zod';
const LoginSchema = z.object({
email: z.string().email().max(254),
password: z.string().min(8).max(128),
});
export function validateLoginInput(raw: unknown) {
const result = LoginSchema.safeParse(raw);
if (!result.success) {
// Return generic error — never echo raw input back
throw new Error('Invalid credentials format');
}
return result.data;
}JWT Validation
import jwt from 'jsonwebtoken';
const JWT_SECRET = process.env.JWT_SECRET!; // never hardcode
export function verifyToken(token: string): jwt.JwtPayload {
// Throws if expired, tampered, or wrong algorithm
const payload = jwt.verify(token, JWT_SECRET, {
algorithms: ['HS256'], // explicitly allowlist algorithm
issuer: 'your-app',
audience: 'your-app',
});
if (typeof payload === 'string') throw new Error('Invalid token payload');
return payload;
}Securing an Endpoint — Full Flow
import express from 'express';
import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit';
import helmet from 'helmet';
const app = express();
app.use(helmet()); // sets CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, etc.
app.use(express.json({ limit: '10kb' })); // limit payload size
const authLimiter = rateLimit({
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes
max: 10, // 10 attempts per window per IP
standardHeaders: true,
legacyHeaders: false,
});
app.post('/api/login', authLimiter, async (req, res) => {
// 1. Validate input
const { email, password } = validateLoginInput(req.body);
// 2. Authenticate — parameterized query, constant-time compare
const user = await getUserByEmail(email);
if (!user || !(await verifyPassword(password, user.passwordHash))) {
// Generic message — do not reveal whether email exists
return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid credentials' });
}
// 3. Authorize — issue scoped, short-lived token
const token = jwt.sign(
{ sub: user.id, role: user.role },
JWT_SECRET,
{ algorithm: 'HS256', expiresIn: '15m', issuer: 'your-app', audience: 'your-app' }
);
// 4. Secure response — token in httpOnly cookie, not body
res.cookie('token', token, { httpOnly: true, secure: true, sameSite: 'strict' });
return res.json({ message: 'Authenticated' });
});Output Templates
When implementing security features, provide:
- Secure implementation code
- Security considerations noted
- Configuration requirements (env vars, headers)
- Testing recommendations
Knowledge Reference
OWASP Top 10, bcrypt/argon2, JWT, OAuth 2.0, OIDC, CSP, CORS, rate limiting, input validation, output encoding, encryption (AES, RSA), TLS, security headers
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- Antthonyyy/marketing-agents-kit★ 0100% same
- james-paul25/claude-skill★ 0100% same
Edited · 8
- Jeffallan/claude-skills★ 12k97% same
- heyongjun666/AICU-Graph★ 20097% same
- PIXARTSeu/Synapse★ 9100% same
- thesaifalitai/claude-setup★ 846% same
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 6100% same
- zacklecon/claude-skills★ 356% same
- hu465/claude-skills-★ 097% same
- usmanmubarak1/ClaudeSkilledAgents★ 051% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-video-generationSkill
- claude-md-improverSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- heron-buildSkill
- heron-claude-dataSkill
- heron-tray-windowsSkill
- minimalist-uiSkill
- product-launch-videoSkill
- rust-engineerSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- svelte5-initSkill
- svelte5-reviewSkill
- tauri-app-autostartSkill
- tauri-app-notificationSkill
- tauri-app-positionerSkill
- tauri-app-system-traySkill
- tauri-buildSkill
- tauri-securitySkill
- tauriSkill
- tauri-windowSkill
- test-masterSkill
- typescript-proSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

