break-glass
Skill2 starsChanged 47 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Move a running job onto a different SOP version - a break_glass recovery procedure when the job has gone off its normal path, or a newer standard version when the process changed mid-flight - with the person's explicit approval, then re-judge its milestones from evidence already recorded. Use when a job was cancelled, damaged, needs a redo or is disputed, or when running jobs must follow a revised SOP.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jamestexas/agentstheir own version, first seen May 16, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- jamestexas/agents★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- call-to-actionSkill
- get-startedSkill
- manage-sopSkill
- update-the-state-machineSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Only a job can change its SOP version, whether it stands alone or sits under a booking.
- Very specific: line 21
Confirm the need: Read read_case_brief for the job.
- Very specific: line 61
When a revised SOP should apply to running jobs, list the jobs on the old version from list_work (each entry shows sop_version_id) and show …
- Distinctive: line 69
Never move a job without the person's explicit yes.
- Distinctive: line 70
Never move a quote or booking.
- Distinctive: line 71
Never mark a dropped milestone done to tidy up.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Goal: the job follows the procedure it is really on, its history intact, and its new milestones judged from what the ledger already knows.
What the ledger allows
- Only a job can change its SOP version, whether it stands alone or sits under a booking. A quote or a booking keeps the version its chain started with, to the end; say so if the person asks.
- The change is a new adoption that names the current one. Nothing is deleted: the earlier adoption stays readable, and milestones the new version leaves out stay as history, never marked done.
- A retired version cannot be adopted.
Steps
- Confirm the need. Read
read_case_brieffor the job. Say to the person what happened and why the current procedure no longer fits, citing the evidence. - Choose the target.
list_sop_versionswith statusactive, and tagbreak_glassfor a recovery procedure or tagstandardfor a newer version; a retired version is refused. Show the person the candidates by name and let them choose. A good target copies, word for word, the job's milestones up to the break point, so the job keeps them. If none fits, stop and write one first with themanage-sopskill, as a fork of the job's current SOP. Never choose for them. - Record the approval. Their yes, word for word, as evidence, linked
to the job with
about_work. The adoption must cite it. - Adopt.
read_work_sopgives the current adoption's ID and its milestones;read_sop_versiongives the target's job stage. Calladopt_sop_versionon the job withexpected_previous_adoption_idset to the current adoption, a reason in plain words, and evidence IDs for both the approval and the evidence that made the change necessary. Bind every phase and milestone of the job stage. To keep a milestone and its judgments, bind its existing milestone ID and its phase's existing phase ID, both shown byread_work_sop. That works only when the title, the criterion and the phase name are unchanged; anything else gets a new ID. A staleexpected_previous_adoption_idis refused: read again and retry. - Re-judge from what is recorded.
read_work_sopagain: itscurrent_adoptionholds the milestones to judge now, and the dropped ones stay as history; judge only the current ones. Onerecord_reviewjudging those the recorded evidence already settles, citing it, with a memo saying which version the job moved to, why, and on whose approval. Record nothing new from the inbox here; new updates go throughupdate-the-state-machine. - Review what is owed.
read_work_moneyfor the job. What is owed to the business stays. Charges recorded before the move are marked; put each open one the business owes to the person and ask whether it still stands. Record their answer as in theupdate-the-state-machineskill's money page. - Read back and hand over.
read_case_briefagain, thencall-to-actionfor the job.
Several jobs at once
When a revised SOP should apply to running jobs, list the jobs on the old
version from list_work (each entry shows sop_version_id) and show the
person the list first. Move each job on its own, with its own adoption
and memo; one approval may cover the list if the person gives it for the
list, and is cited by each.
Never
- Never move a job without the person's explicit yes.
- Never move a quote or booking; the ledger refuses it.
- Never mark a dropped milestone done to tidy up; it stays as history.
Done when: the job's current adoption is the version the person chose, the read-back shows the new milestones judged where evidence allowed, and one memo explains the move.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

