geo-data-engineering
Skill39 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Always invoke when geospatial data must be acquired, prepared, repaired, scaled, or moved through a repeatable pipeline. Covers open-data/OSM/STAC acquisition, spatial formats, CRS transforms, quality checks, and batch ETL architecture for growing or recurring joins. Invoke alongside PostGIS for database execution and alongside SWE standards when code is delivered. Do not trigger merely because another specialist reads analysis-ready data.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- arcgis-pro-automationSkill
- cartography-geovizSkill
- change-detectionSkill
- geoai-orchestratorSkill
- geo-deep-learningSkill
- geostatistics-interpolationSkill
- google-earth-engineSkill
- mcda-suitability-analysisSkill
- ml-experiment-standardsSkill
- movement-trajectorySkill
- network-accessibility-analysisSkill
- point-cloud-lidarSkill
- postgis-spatial-sqlSkill
- remote-sensing-analysisSkill
- spatial-statisticsSkill
- swe-devops-standardsSkill
- terrain-hydrologySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 55
Never strip or overwrite a CRS to "fix" misaligned layers — diagnose which layer is wrong with a known landmark instead.
- Very specific: line 60
Run scripts/clean_vector.py (or import its clean_vector() function) as the standard hygiene pass: drops empty/null geometries, repairs …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Geospatial Data Engineering
Purpose: get spatial data into a clean, validated, analysis-ready state with a repeatable pipeline — the stage where most real-world GIS time is spent and most silent errors are born.
Format selection
| Format | Use for | Avoid because |
| GeoParquet | Analysis interchange, big vector, columnar workflows | Not yet readable by some legacy desktop GIS |
| GeoPackage | Desktop GIS exchange, multi-layer projects | Slower than Parquet at scale; SQLite locking |
| FlatGeobuf | Streaming, HTTP range reads | Single layer |
| COG (Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF) | All raster deliverables | — (make every GeoTIFF a COG) |
| Zarr/NetCDF | Multi-dimensional (time × band × y × x) | Overkill for single rasters |
| Shapefile | Only when a legacy tool demands it | 10-char columns, 2 GB cap, encoding chaos, multi-file fragility |
| CSV + WKT/lon-lat | Simple point exchange | No CRS metadata — document it explicitly |
Acquisition playbook
- OpenStreetMap: small areas →
osmnx; large extracts → Geofabrik PBF +pyrosm/osmium. Respect tag heterogeneity: always inspect tag value distributions before filtering. - Buildings/places at scale: Overture Maps (GeoParquet on S3/Azure, query with DuckDB spatial — often the fastest path).
- Satellite/raster: STAC APIs via
pystac-client+odc-stac— seeremote-sensing-analysis; planetary archives →google-earth-engine. - Boundaries: authoritative national source first; Natural Earth / GADM / geoBoundaries for global work — record which, versions differ materially.
- Record every acquisition: source URL, query parameters, retrieval date,
license. Put it in a
DATA_SOURCES.mdnext to the data.
CRS engineering
- Store in EPSG:4326 or source CRS; analyze in a projected CRS suited to
the extent: local UTM zone (
gdf.estimate_utm_crs()), national grid, or equal-area (EPSG:6933/Mollweide) for cross-region area stats. - Datum shifts matter at sub-meter precision: transformations between datums
need the right transformation grid (
pyproj.network.set_network_enabled(True)when accuracy matters). - Never strip or overwrite a CRS to "fix" misaligned layers — diagnose which layer is wrong with a known landmark instead.
Cleaning pipeline
Run scripts/clean_vector.py (or import its clean_vector() function) as
the standard hygiene pass: drops empty/null geometries, repairs invalid ones
with make_valid, de-duplicates, reprojects, and prints an accounting
report so silent data loss is impossible.
Then: normalize text attributes (trim, collapse whitespace, locale-aware
casefold — beware Turkish İ/ı, German ß), coerce dtypes explicitly, and show
value_counts() of every categorical you will later filter on.
Scale strategies
- Fits in RAM: GeoPandas + Shapely 2 vectorized ops. Ensure the spatial
index is used (
sjoin,query_bulk) — hand-rolled loops are O(n²). - Bigger than RAM, single machine: DuckDB
spatialextension over GeoParquet (predicate pushdown + spatial SQL), ordask-geopandas. - Served / concurrent / transactional: PostGIS — see
postgis-spatial-sql. - Rasters: windowed reads (
rasterio.windows), chunked xarray + dask; neverread()a 50 GB mosaic into memory.
Pipeline standards
- Idempotent steps with explicit inputs/outputs on disk; re-running never corrupts state.
- Checkpoint after expensive stages (download, big join) in GeoParquet/GPKG.
- Log an accounting line per stage: rows/features/pixels in → out.
- Deterministic ordering before writing (sort by stable key) so diffs are meaningful.
Pitfalls checklist
- CSV opened without declaring lon/lat columns' CRS.
- Shapefile column names silently truncated on export.
- Encoding mojibake from legacy files (try
encoding="utf-8"then cp1252). - Mixed geometry types in one layer (Polygon + MultiPolygon breaks some
tools — normalize with
.explode()or promote to Multi*). - Antimeridian and pole-crossing geometries after naive reprojection.
- Downloaded "latest" data with no recorded version/date — unreproducible.
Execution contract
- Workflow: inventory sources and contracts; acquire with provenance; inspect CRS, schema, geometry, and scale; clean deterministically; validate; write an analysis-ready artifact.
- Decision rules: select formats and engines from size, geometry, concurrency, and downstream access needs; never infer CRS or destructive repairs silently.
- Verification protocol: reconcile feature or pixel counts at every stage, assert CRS and geometry invariants, sample outputs spatially, and rerun to confirm idempotence.
- Failure modes: quarantine ambiguous CRS, mixed units, invalid encodings, lossy format conversions, or unexplained row loss instead of guessing.
- Deliverables: validated dataset, machine-readable schema and CRS, provenance manifest, accounting log, rejected-record report, and reproducible pipeline.
- Source freshness: consult the authoritative source registry before using version-sensitive formats or APIs and record the checked date.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

