brain-capture
Skill16 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Zero-friction quick capture into the user's local second-brain, and the inbox review loop that processes what was captured. Use this skill when the user wants to jot something down fast without deciding where it goes, dump a thought or idea mid-conversation, or later triage the inbox — promoting items into real notes, retagging them, or discarding them. Backs `brain capture`, `brain capture list`, and `brain capture review`. For ingesting content that already exists (a file, an email, a transcript) use `ingest-brain`; for authoring a deliberate titled note use `brain-authoring`; for what *you the agent* record about the user across sessions use `brain-memory`. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: capture this, jot this down, quick note, note to self, add to my inbox, dump this in my brain, capture idea, my inbox, review my inbox, process my inbox, triage my captures, what's in my inbox, brain capture.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DentalEdge-Solutions/claude_codetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- nikolajhh2008-svg/brainwardentheir own version, first seen Jul 9, 2026
- franckdjiongo/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 6, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- nikolajhh2008-svg/brainwarden★ 2same name
- DentalEdge-Solutions/claude_code★ 1same name
- franckdjiongo/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brain-askSkill
- brain-authoringSkill
- brain-graphSkill
- brain-maintenanceSkill
- brain-memorySkill
- brain-proactivitySkill
- brain-todoSkill
- consult-brainSkill
- elicit-brainSkill
- ingest-brainSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 40
If the user says "capture this" about something they just said, that is this skill.
- Very specific: line 124
After a promote or tag, the item is an ordinary document — reachable through brain search / brain recall / brain show (see consult-brain, …
- Very specific: line 138
ddeletes the document outright: No undo, no trash. Confirm with the user before discarding anything you did not capture in this same … - Very specific: line 149
If brain capture errors outright instead of printing a confirmation, that is an environment problem — route to brain-maintenance (brain …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brain Capture
The inbox pattern: capture now, decide later. brain capture takes a thought
that has no home yet, stores it as a document tagged inbox, and gets out of
the way. Nothing about the note's eventual place — folder, title, tags — has to
be settled at capture time. brain capture review is the other half: the
deliberate pass where inbox items become real notes or get thrown away.
Capture is cheap and reversible. Review is interactive and destructive — read "Safety rules" before running it.
capture vs ingest vs note new
| The content is… | Use | Why |
| A thought the user just had, no home yet | brain capture | Tagged inbox, triaged later |
| Shares the user sent from their phone ("Save to Brain") | brain capture import --dir PATH --since 7d | Each file in the capture folder becomes an inbox note, then is deleted; --dry-run first. Guide: docs/guides/mobile-capture.md |
| A file / email / transcript that already exists | ingest-brain | Extraction, dedup, source tracking |
| A deliberate note with a title and a place | brain-authoring (brain note new) | Templates, folders, frontmatter |
If the user says "capture this" about something they just said, that is this
skill. If they say it about a document, a link, or a meeting, it is
ingest-brain — those need extraction, not a text box.
Capturing
brain capture --text "Follow up on the cutover window before the next review"
brain capture --text "Idea: batch the nightly re-embed" -t ideas -t infra
echo "A thought, piped in" | brain capture --title "re-embed idea"| Flag | Purpose |
--text <str> | Content inline. Omit it and content is read from stdin. |
--title <str> | Title. Defaults to a date-stamped auto-title. |
-t / --tag <str> | Extra tag(s), repeatable, applied alongside the always-on inbox tag. |
Two rules worth internalising:
- The
inboxtag is not optional and is not something you pass — every capture gets it. That tag is the entire mechanism by whichcapture listandcapture reviewfind the item later. - With no
--text, capture reads stdin. Invoking it with neither a--textflag nor piped input blocks waiting on a terminal that is not there. Always supply one or the other.
Capture the user's words, not your paraphrase. The value of an inbox item is
that it preserves the original thought; a summary of it is a different, lesser
artifact. If the thought is long enough to need structure, it is a note — hand
off to brain-authoring.
Importing phone shares
The user's "Save to Brain" iOS Shortcut writes each share into an iCloud Drive folder
configured with mode = "capture" (docs/guides/mobile-capture.md).
brain capture import --dir PATH --since 7d --dry-run # show the user the list first
brain capture import --dir PATH --since 7dIt deletes each file once its note exists, and refuses without --dir PATH and
--since Nd. Only use a folder the user named or one already configured as a capture
folder; never edit drop-folders.toml unless asked. A rejected file (over 1 MiB, or
not UTF-8 text) stays in the folder's imported/.
Reading the inbox
brain capture list
brain capture list --jsonA compact <id> <kind> <type> <title> table, mirroring brain list. The JSON
form is an array whose items carry their tags (always including inbox) —
use it when you need to reason about the inbox rather than show it.
An empty inbox prints nothing interesting and exits 0. That is the desired steady state, not a problem to investigate.
Triaging the inbox
brain capture review
brain capture review -n 5
brain capture review --autoInteractive review offers five choices per item:
| Key | Action |
p | Promote — drop the inbox tag; the item becomes an ordinary document |
t TAG ... | Tag — add tags and drop inbox |
d | Discard — delete the document, behind a second explicit y / Y |
s | Skip — leave it in the inbox |
q | Quit the pass |
--limit / -n caps the pass at N items (default 10). --auto routes every
item through the local-Ollama tag proposer instead of asking; it leaves items
without a summary untouched, so an --auto pass that clears nothing is a
normal outcome, not a failure.
After a promote or tag, the item is an ordinary document — reachable through
brain search / brain recall / brain show (see consult-brain, which
carries the cost-ordered guide to picking between them) and editable through
brain-authoring.
Safety rules
brain capture reviewis interactive and destructive. NEVER pipe blindd/yresponses into it.--limitselects items by inbox order, not by relevance, so a scripted confirmation deletes whatever happens to sit at the front of the queue — not the item you had in mind. Doing exactly this destroyed a real note on 2026-06-09. Show the user each item and let them choose. If they want a bulk pass,--autois the supported route: it retags, it never deletes.ddeletes the document outright. No undo, no trash. Confirm with the user before discarding anything you did not capture in this same conversation.- Never capture on the user's behalf without being asked. A capture writes to their corpus; "that's interesting" is not a request to store something.
- Never invent the content. Capture what the user said. If you cannot tell which part of a long message they meant, ask — an inbox full of your guesses is worse than an empty one.
- Exit 0 with no output is a valid result. An empty
capture listmeans the inbox is clear. Do not re-run with different flags hunting for items.
If brain capture errors outright instead of printing a confirmation, that is
an environment problem — route to brain-maintenance (brain doctor first)
rather than retrying the capture and risking a duplicate.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

