agentleFS
mpaaratingmpaarating/ai-workflow-kit/skills/read-later/SKILL.md

read-later

Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Save articles with AI-generated summaries and category tags

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If fetching fails (paywall, 404, timeout), save with just the URL and title from the link text.

    line 27
  2. Distinctive:

    Write a 3-4 sentence summary of the article.

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep the summary factual. Don't editorialize.

    line 37
  4. Distinctive:

    Add to the reading list.

    line 53
  5. Distinctive:

    Using {{notes}}: Create an entry with fields: Title, URL, Summary, Category, Date Saved, Status (Unread).

    line 55

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Read Later

Save articles to your reading list with a short summary and category tag. Never lose an interesting link again.

Trigger Phrases

  • "read later:"
  • "save article"
  • "interesting:"
  • "read this:"

Workflow

Step 1: Extract URL

Parse the URL from the user's message. If no URL is provided, ask for one.

Step 2: Fetch Article

Fetch the page content and extract the article body, title, author, and publication date. Strip navigation, ads, and boilerplate.

If fetching fails (paywall, 404, timeout), save with just the URL and title from the link text. Note: "Could not fetch full content."

Step 3: Generate Summary

Write a 3-4 sentence summary of the article. Focus on:

  • What the article is about (one sentence)
  • The key insight or argument (one-two sentences)
  • Why it matters or who it's useful for (one sentence)

Keep the summary factual. Don't editorialize.

Step 4: Categorize

Assign one category tag based on the content:

CategorySignals
AIMachine learning, LLMs, AI tools, agents
Web DevFrontend, backend, frameworks, APIs
DevOpsInfrastructure, CI/CD, deployment, monitoring
CareerGrowth, management, interviewing, culture
GeneralEverything else

Step 5: Save

Add to the reading list.

Using {{notes}}: Create an entry with fields: Title, URL, Summary, Category, Date Saved, Status (Unread).

Markdown fallback: Append to ~/.ai-workflow/reading-list.md:

## [Article Title](https://example.com/article)
- **Saved**: 2026-03-19
- **Category**: AI
- **Status**: Unread

Summary text here.

---

Step 6: Confirm

Respond with a brief confirmation:

Saved: "Building Agents That Actually Work" (AI)
> 3-sentence summary here.

Examples

Save from URL:

read later: https://example.com/great-article

Saved: "Great Article Title" (Web Dev)
> The article covers new patterns for server components in React 19.
> Key insight: streaming SSR reduces TTFB by 40% in benchmarks.
> Useful for frontend engineers migrating from client-side rendering.

Quick save:

interesting: https://example.com/ai-agents-2026

Saved: "AI Agents in 2026: What Changed" (AI)
> Overview of how agent architectures evolved over the past year.
> Main argument: tool-use reliability matters more than model size.
> Good context for anyone building or evaluating AI tooling.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.