agentleFS
moltbotmoltbot/moltbot/skills/gh-issues/SKILL.md

gh-issues

Skill393k starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub

Fetch GitHub issues, select candidates, spawn background fix agents, open PRs, and optionally process PR review comments.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use for issue-to-PR automation.

    line 27
  2. Very specific:

    If gh auth status fails and GH_TOKEN is missing, stop and ask for GitHub auth/config.

    line 60
  3. Distinctive:

    Stop on dirty worktree unless user confirms that workers should ignore uncommitted changes.

    line 69
  4. Distinctive:

    Verify auth/read access only:

    line 73
  5. Very specific:

    Add --label, --milestone, --assignee, --state, --limit as requested.

    line 89
  6. Very specific:

    If none found: report no matches.

    line 91
  7. Distinctive:

    Create the parent directory before writing.

    line 112
  8. Distinctive:

    After confirmation, in fork mode, configure the push remote before handing work to agents:

    line 122
  9. Very specific:

    Before each spawn, write a claim for SOURCE_REPO#<n> with the current ISO timestamp.

    line 135
  10. Very specific:

    Use coding-agent launch rules when available.

    line 160
  11. Very specific:

    Only process fix/issue-* PRs created by this workflow unless the user explicitly named PR numbers.

    line 189
  12. Distinctive:

    Stop when user says stop.

    line 211
  13. Distinctive:

    Keep cumulative summary small.

    line 213

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

gh-issues

Use for issue-to-PR automation. Prefer gh CLI; fall back to gh api only when a high-level command lacks the needed field.

Arguments

  • positional owner/repo: optional; else infer from git remote get-url origin.
  • --label <label>: filter.
  • --limit <n>: default 10.
  • --milestone <title>: filter.
  • --assignee <login|@me>: filter.
  • --state open|closed|all: default open.
  • --fork <owner/repo>: push branches to fork, PR to source.
  • --watch: poll issues + reviews.
  • --interval <minutes>: default 5.
  • --dry-run: list only.
  • --yes: no confirmation.
  • --reviews-only: skip issue fixing; handle PR reviews.
  • --cron: spawn and exit; implies --yes.
  • --model <id>: pass to workers when supported.
  • --notify-channel <id>: optional final notification target.

Phase 1: resolve repo

git remote get-url origin
if [ -z "${GH_TOKEN:-}" ]; then
  CONFIG_PATH="${OPENCLAW_CONFIG_PATH:-${OPENCLAW_STATE_DIR:-$HOME/.openclaw}/openclaw.json}"
  GH_TOKEN=$(jq -r '.skills.entries["gh-issues"].apiKey // empty' "$CONFIG_PATH" 2>/dev/null || true)
  if [ -n "$GH_TOKEN" ]; then export GH_TOKEN; fi
fi
gh auth status
gh repo view OWNER/REPO --json nameWithOwner,defaultBranchRef

If gh auth status fails and GH_TOKEN is missing, stop and ask for GitHub auth/config.

Derived:

  • SOURCE_REPO: issue repo.
  • PUSH_REPO: fork if set, else source.
  • BASE_BRANCH: source default branch unless user says otherwise.
  • PUSH_REMOTE: fork in fork mode, else origin.

Stop on dirty worktree unless user confirms that workers should ignore uncommitted changes.

In fork mode, do not mutate remotes before confirmation or during --dry-run.

Verify auth/read access only:

gh auth token >/dev/null || test -n "${GH_TOKEN:-}"
gh repo view "$PUSH_REPO" --json nameWithOwner
git ls-remote --exit-code origin HEAD

Phase 2: fetch issues

Build filters and fetch:

gh issue list --repo "$SOURCE_REPO" --state open --limit 10 --json number,title,labels,url,body,assignees,milestone

Add --label, --milestone, --assignee, --state, --limit as requested. gh issue list already excludes PRs.

If none found: report no matches. If --dry-run: show compact list and stop.

Phase 3: avoid duplicate work

For each candidate:

gh pr list --repo "$SOURCE_REPO" --search "$SOURCE_REPO#<n>" --state open --json number,url,title,headRefName
gh pr list --repo "$SOURCE_REPO" --head "fix/issue-<n>" --state open --json number,url
gh api "repos/$PUSH_REPO/branches/fix/issue-<n>" >/dev/null

Skip candidates with an open PR, existing branch, or active local claim.

Claim file:

${OPENCLAW_STATE_DIR:-$HOME/.openclaw}/gh-issues-<owner>-<repo>.json

Expire claims older than 2 hours. Create the parent directory before writing.

Phase 4: confirm

Unless --yes or --cron, ask user to choose:

  • all
  • comma-separated issue numbers
  • cancel

After confirmation, in fork mode, configure the push remote before handing work to agents:

gh auth setup-git
git remote get-url fork || git remote add fork "https://github.com/$PUSH_REPO.git"
git remote set-url fork "https://github.com/$PUSH_REPO.git"
git ls-remote --exit-code fork HEAD

Phase 5: spawn workers

Launch up to 8 background workers. Do not block on each worker when --cron.

Before each spawn, write a claim for SOURCE_REPO#<n> with the current ISO timestamp. After a worker reports PR/failure, remove or update the claim. This prevents watch/cron overlap before a branch or PR exists.

Worker prompt must include:

  • issue URL, title, body, labels.
  • SOURCE_REPO, PUSH_REPO, BASE_BRANCH, PUSH_REMOTE, fork mode.
  • target branch fix/issue-<n>.
  • required proof and PR body.
  • notification route.

Worker instructions:

Use gh and git. Do not handwave.
Checkout/create fix/issue-<n> from BASE_BRANCH.
Implement minimal fix.
Run relevant tests.
Commit with conventional message.
Push to PUSH_REMOTE.
Open PR against SOURCE_REPO BASE_BRANCH.
PR body: What Problem This Solves + Why This Change Was Made + User Impact + Evidence + visible Fixes SOURCE_REPO#<n>.
Report PR URL or failure reason.
Send completion/failure with openclaw message send if route provided.

Use coding-agent launch rules when available.

Phase 6: collect

Poll workers with process or task registry. Report:

  • issue number + title.
  • status: PR opened, skipped, failed, timed out.
  • PR URL or reason.

Notify channel only with final compact summary.

Reviews-only / watch reviews

Discover open PRs:

gh pr list --repo "$SOURCE_REPO" --state open --json number,title,url,headRefName,reviewDecision \
  --jq '[.[] | select(.headRefName | startswith("fix/issue-"))]'

Fetch review threads/comments:

gh pr view <n> --repo "$SOURCE_REPO" --json url,headRefName,comments,reviews
gh api "repos/$SOURCE_REPO/pulls/<n>/comments"
gh api "repos/$SOURCE_REPO/issues/<n>/comments"

Only process fix/issue-* PRs created by this workflow unless the user explicitly named PR numbers. Group actionable comments by PR. Ignore praise, status, duplicates, and already-addressed comments. Spawn one worker per selected/scoped PR, same background rules.

Review worker instructions:

Checkout PR branch.
Read all actionable review comments.
Patch minimal changes.
Run relevant tests.
Commit and push normally; do not force-push unless explicitly told.
Reply to addressed comments with fix + commit/file reference.
Report comments addressed/skipped and proof.

Watch mode

Loop:

  1. Fetch issues.
  2. Spawn eligible issue workers.
  3. Process actionable PR reviews.
  4. Sleep --interval.
  5. Stop when user says stop.

Keep cumulative summary small.

Download now (ZIP)

Trending

Quiet since March.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 48 mentionsFeb 2026: 5 mentionsMar 2026: 1 mentionApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 0 mentionsAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the moltbot/moltbot repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about moltbot/moltbot

The biggest 5 of 54 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 54

Talked about on GitHub, the web, Bluesky and Hacker News (54 times).

On GitHub · 32

27 more on GitHub

On the web · 14

9 more on the web

On Bluesky · 5

On Hacker News · 3

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.