agentleFS
Sign inStart free
Model Context ProtocolKnown publishermodelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk/.agents/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md

review-pr

Skill1.6k starsChanged 11 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Comprehensive PR review using specialized agents. Use when asked to review a pull request or local changes before committing or creating a PR.

185 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Trending

More talk lately.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 1 mentionMay 2026: 2 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 1 mentionAug 2026: 3 mentionsSep 2026: 35 mentionsOct 2026: 4 mentionsNov 2026: 1 mention
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the modelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about modelcontextprotocol/swift-sdk

The biggest 5 of 55 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 55

Talked about on GitHub and Bluesky (55 times).

On GitHub · 50

45 more on GitHub

Used with

Projects with it also use diagnose-ci-failures, docs-loop and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • zerx-labSkill

    diagnose-ci-failures

    Diagnose CI failures for a PR using the GitHub CLI, extract error logs, and generate a plan to fix them. Use when the user asks to check CI status, pull CI issues, triage test failures, or investigate PR build failures.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GeiserXSkill

    docs-loop

    Use when the user asks to audit docs, check documentation for stale claims, or verify docs against the code.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GeiserXSkill

    full-loop

    Drive a repository to done with sergio-loop, then keep improving it with refine-loop at a descending theta. Use only when the user explicitly invokes full-loop.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • n24q02mSkill

    review-delta

    Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • n24q02mSkill

    build-graph

    Build or update the code review knowledge graph. Run this first to initialize, or let hooks keep it updated automatically.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +7 more from GeiserX
  • Other versions185 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 1

    1. kubeflow/trainer★ 2.3k93% same

    Wrote their own version · 184

    1. denoland/deno★ 109ksame name
    2. ToolJet/ToolJet★ 41ksame name
    3. remix-run/remix★ 33ksame name
    4. tirth8205/code-review-graph★ 33ksame name
    5. alpinejs/alpine★ 32ksame name
    6. nrwl/nx★ 29ksame name
    7. PrefectHQ/fastmcp★ 28ksame name
    8. jlowin/fastmcp★ 28ksame name
    9. livewire/livewire★ 24ksame name
    10. microsoft/fluentui★ 20ksame name

    174 more not listed

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 178 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 11

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 178 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free