docs-review
Skill465 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Review and edit Mintlify documentation against the house style guide in style-guide/. Use when reviewing a docs diff or pull request, before handing back a draft you wrote, or when asked to check a page for style. Covers the order to review in, the checks Vale can't do, and how to report changes.
25 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- langchain-ai/docstheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- mindroom-ai/mindroomtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- NathanForster/claude-commandstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- T0mSIlver/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- microsoft/nacelletheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- grimoire-rs/grimoiretheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use code-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions25 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 25
- storybookjs/storybook★ 91ksame name
- metabase/metabase★ 50ksame name
- grafana/tempo★ 5.6ksame name
- graphistry/pygraphistry★ 2.6ksame name
- perber/leafwiki★ 1.2ksame name
- jtenniswood/espcontrol★ 1.2ksame name
- Harry-kp/vortix★ 757same name
- getsentry/sentry-rust★ 754same name
- getsentry/sentry-docs★ 449same name
- langchain-ai/docs★ 445same name
15 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- .mintlify/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/component-reference.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/writing-standards.mdcCursor rule
- mintlifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Check every fact against the product, not against other docs pages, because other pages can be out of date:
- Very specific: line 17
Behavior claims: Read the code path before you describe what the product does.
- Distinctive: line 19
If you can't verify a fact, list it under areas of uncertainty in your report.
- Very specific: line 25
Lint: If you have a shell, run vale on the changed files, mint broken-links, and mint a11y.
- Distinctive: line 30
Apply the findings: If the person you're working with wrote or edited prose in this conversation, don't change their sentences.
- Distinctive: line 33
Before you hand the page back, check it for every mistake you've already been corrected on, including corrections earlier in the …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Docs review
style-guide/ holds the rules for this repo's docs. This skill doesn't repeat them. It describes the order to apply them in.
Before you review anything, read style-guide/README.md and every file it lists. Don't work from memory of the guide or a summary of it. If you don't have a local checkout, read the files from the mintlify project with the Mintlify Admin MCP read tool.
Check facts against the product
Check every fact against the product, not against other docs pages, because other pages can be out of date:
- UI steps: Take button, tab, and field names and the order of screens from the product or its frontend source.
- Behavior claims: Read the code path before you describe what the product does. If another docs page contradicts the code, find out why before you edit either page.
If you can't verify a fact, list it under areas of uncertainty in your report. Never guess.
Review order
Review your own drafts the same way you review anyone else's. Cut first, then check the structure, then the sentences. Rewriting a sentence is wasted work if the sentence shouldn't be on the page.
- Lint. If you have a shell, run
valeon the changed files,mint broken-links, andmint a11y. If you don't, fix any validation errors your edits return. Either way, a clean run doesn't mean the page follows the guide. - Cut what the reader won't act on. Read the page one paragraph at a time and apply "Leave out what the reader won't act on" in
style-guide/content-strategy.md. Apply it to existing content, other people's content, and your own draft. No other step catches this, and restructuring a sentence that should be cut makes the page longer. - Check the structure against
style-guide/content-strategy.md: page structure, prerequisites, where content goes, and duplication. - Check every sentence against
style-guide/voice-and-tone.md. Take the "Clear sentences" rules one heading at a time, and check every sentence on the page against that rule before you move to the next one. Then check "Phrases to cut" and "AI-writing tells." - Check formatting and components against
style-guide/formatting-and-components.mdand terms againststyle-guide/word-list.md. - Apply the findings. If the person you're working with wrote or edited prose in this conversation, don't change their sentences. Report those findings and ask once whether to apply them.
- Review the edited page again from the top, steps 1 to 5. Your edits create new problems. For example, turning a paragraph into a list can leave several short paragraphs in a row.
Before you hand the page back, check it for every mistake you've already been corrected on, including corrections earlier in the conversation.
Report
List one change per line, grouped by file:
- The location as
path/to/file.mdx:12. - The rule the change fixes.
- The text before and after the change, or "cut" for a step 2 finding.
Include the fixes from step 7, then list areas of uncertainty.
When Vale is wrong
Narrow or fix the Vale rule in .vale/styles/Mintlify/ rather than rewriting correct prose to satisfy it. To turn off a rule for one line, wrap the line in {/* vale Mintlify.RuleName = NO */} and {/* vale Mintlify.RuleName = YES */}. Never turn off a rule for a whole page to hide problems.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

