recommend
Skill0 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Get a model recommendation for a specific task type. User runs /model-router:recommend [task_type] or asks "what model should I use for X?" If not provided, ask the user what they're trying to do. Read ~/.model-router/config.yaml and ~/.model-router/models.yaml If config doesn't exist: If task_type argument provided, use it. If not, ask: Map their response to a task_type. From models.yaml, get the recommendations for this task type: - best: Highest quality option - runner_up: Good alternative - budget: Cheapest option Check which…
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Dariusplayer09/adaptive-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- OHOKAYYEAH/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- agent-sh/skillerstheir own version, first seen Oct 3, 2026
- njt2810/claude-code-frameworktheir own version, first seen Sep 10, 2026
- winchxyz/idea-to-buildtheir own version, first seen Jun 9, 2026
- rajnavakoti/claude-code-viewtheir own version, first seen Mar 5, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- agenticnotetaking/arscontexta★ 3.5ksame name
- winchxyz/idea-to-build★ 9same name
- agent-sh/skillers★ 4same name
- Dariusplayer09/adaptive-skills★ 1same name
- njt2810/claude-code-framework★ 1same name
- OHOKAYYEAH/claude-skills★ 1same name
- rajnavakoti/claude-code-view★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
If not provided, ask the user what they're trying to do.
- Very specific: line 19
Read ~/.model-router/config.yaml and ~/.model-router/models.yaml
- Distinctive: line 21
If config doesn't exist:
- Distinctive: line 28
If task_type argument provided, use it.
- Distinctive: line 55
Check which models the user actually has access to:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Model Router Recommend
Get a model recommendation for a specific task type.
Trigger
User runs /model-router:recommend [task_type] or asks "what model should I use for X?"
Arguments
task_type(optional): One ofcritical_code,code_review,reasoning,math_logic,simple_edits,bulk_operations,writing,analysis
If not provided, ask the user what they're trying to do.
Instructions
1. Load Configuration
Read ~/.model-router/config.yaml and ~/.model-router/models.yaml
If config doesn't exist:
No configuration found. Run /model-router:setup first.2. Determine Task Type
If task_type argument provided, use it.
If not, ask:
What kind of task are you working on?
○ Code review / refactoring
○ Critical production code
○ Reasoning / math / logic
○ Simple edits / formatting
○ Bulk operations / batch processing
○ Writing / documentation
○ Analysis / summarization
○ Something else (describe it)Map their response to a task_type.
3. Get Recommendations
From models.yaml, get the recommendations for this task type:
best: Highest quality optionrunner_up: Good alternativebudget: Cheapest option
4. Filter by Availability
Check which models the user actually has access to:
- Claude models → Always available (they're using Claude Code)
- GPT models → Requires
chatgpt_plus: trueAND codex CLI installed - Gemini models → Requires
google_ai_pro: trueAND gemini CLI installed - Ollama models → Requires
ollama.enabled: trueAND model inollama.modelslist
5. Apply Routing Preference
Based on preferences.routing:
preserve_claude: Order by non-Claude first
1. Ollama models (free)
2. ChatGPT models (via Codex)
3. Gemini models (via Gemini CLI)
4. Claude models (last resort)quality_first: Order by quality tier
1. best model for task
2. runner_up
3. budget optionbudget_first: Order by cost
1. Free (Ollama)
2. Cheap (Gemini Flash, Haiku)
3. Moderate (Sonnet, GPT-5.2)
4. Expensive (Opus)6. Present Recommendation
Task: [task_type_description]
Recommended models (based on your setup):
1. [model_name] [RECOMMENDED]
Provider: [provider]
Why: [reason based on task + user preference]
How: [CLI command or "Use Claude directly"]
2. [model_name]
Provider: [provider]
Why: [alternative reason]
How: [CLI command]
3. [model_name]
Provider: [provider]
Why: [budget/fallback reason]
How: [CLI command]
---
To use: Tell me "use [model_name]" or run the CLI command directly.Example Output
Task: Code Review
Recommended models (based on your setup):
1. GPT-5.2 via Codex [RECOMMENDED]
Provider: OpenAI (ChatGPT Plus)
Why: Preserves Claude usage, HumanEval 91%, included in your subscription
How: codex exec -m gpt-5.2 "Review this code: [paste code]"
2. Gemini 3 Pro
Provider: Google (AI Pro)
Why: Strong coding benchmark (76% SWE-bench), good alternative
How: gemini -y -m gemini-3-pro-preview "[prompt]"
3. Claude Sonnet 4.5
Provider: Anthropic (Claude Pro)
Why: Best quality (92% HumanEval), uses Claude subscription
How: I'll handle this directly
---
To use: Tell me "use GPT-5.2" or run the codex command.If No Models Available
No models available for [task_type].
You may need to:
- Set up CLI tools: /model-router:configure
- Add subscriptions: /model-router:setup
- Install Ollama for free local modelsDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

