agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/winappCli/plugins/winui/agent-plugin/skills/winui-code-review/SKILL.md

winui-code-review

Skill1.4k starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub

Review WinUI 3 code or changes for quality: MVVM, x:Bind correctness, accessibility, theming, security, performance, and WinUI analyzer findings. Use when asked to review or audit a WinUI app or its pending changes, or before committing. Catches issues the compiler and UI tests miss.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about microsoft/winappCli

The biggest 5 of 52 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 52

Talked about on GitHub, Bluesky and Stack Overflow (52 times).

On GitHub · 50

45 more on GitHub

On Bluesky · 1

On Stack Overflow · 1

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run a code review after the app builds and before committing.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Read through the project's XAML and C# files and check each section below.

    line 12
  3. Very specific:

    Before reporting an API mismatch or recommending a replacement, verify it against the restored app project's references with CLI 0.7+ …

    line 14

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

When to Use

Run a code review after the app builds and before committing. This catches quality issues that aren't build errors and aren't visible in UI tests — patterns that compile and run but are wrong, fragile, or slow.

How to Review

Read through the project's XAML and C# files and check each section below. For analyzer setup, see winui-dev-workflow; if it isn't installed, tell the user its checks didn't run.

Before reporting an API mismatch or recommending a replacement, verify it against the restored app project's references with CLI 0.7+ winapp find-api, for example winapp find-api members NavigationView --filter selected --json --project-dir <app-project-dir>. See winui-design for batch property checks and project selection; machine-SDK results are not proof of app-package availability.

The analyzer catches a curated set of WinUI 3 / Windows App SDK issues with categorized 4-digit IDs:

  • WUI0xxx — UWP → WinUI 3 API compatibility (UwpXamlNamespace, Window.Current, CoreDispatcher, GetForCurrentView)
  • WUI1xxx — Migration-table data-driven hints (UWP API has WinAppSDK equivalent, no equivalent, feature-area hint)
  • WUI2xxx — Runtime / layout / XAML pitfalls (raw TabView content, nullable binding paths, ineffective binding modes, null Converter, missing AutomationId, attached-property syntax)
  • WUI3xxx — MVVM patterns (old [ObservableProperty] field syntax)
  • WUI4xxx — Interop (WebView2 not initialized, removed ONNX Runtime GenAI APIs WUI4101-WUI4103)

Use the installed package's diagnostic help links for rule details. Check inherited x:DefaultBindMode and event/command/converter exceptions before treating an omitted mode as a defect. Fix root causes; any justified false-positive suppression must be narrow and documented, not a blanket NoWarn policy. Keep IL/CsWinRT warnings enabled as well; the WinUI analyzer does not replace AOT/trim analysis.

MVVM Compliance

  • ViewModels extend ObservableObject, use [ObservableProperty] partial properties (not fields)
  • Commands use [RelayCommand] attribute, not manual ICommand implementations
  • No UI types in ViewModels (SolidColorBrush, Visibility, BitmapImage) — these belong in converters or XAML
  • No business logic in code-behind — only navigation, dialog coordination, and event wiring
  • async Task for async methods, async void only for event handlers
  • Never replace ObservableCollection<T> — use .Clear() + re-add

x:Bind and Data Binding

  • Prefer {x:Bind} for known source types; runtime {Binding} needs a justified source and, for AOT, a generated property provider
  • Dynamic values use an effective OneWay/TwoWay mode (explicit or inherited x:DefaultBindMode) plus change notifications; don't rewrite stable event/command/converter bindings to satisfy a blanket mode rule
  • x:DataType on DataTemplates using compiled x:Bind, not on Page
  • No nested nullable paths (e.g., ViewModel.Selected.Name) without FallbackValue

Native AOT / Trimming (When Intended)

  • The published artifact was tested (a Release JIT run is not AOT validation), with IL/CsWinRT warnings fixed rather than suppressed
  • ABI-crossing types are partial; JSON and runtime bindings use source generation — see winui-packaging's references/sourcegen-patterns.md

Accessibility

  • AutomationProperties.AutomationId on every interactive control (Button, TextBox, ComboBox, ToggleSwitch, ListView, NavigationViewItem)
  • AutomationProperties.Name on icon-only buttons and controls without visible text
  • Semantic controls (Button, HyperlinkButton) — not clickable Border/TextBlock
  • No information conveyed by color alone

Theming

  • All colors use {ThemeResource} brushes — no hardcoded #FF0000 or Color="Blue"
  • Typography uses built-in styles (TitleTextBlockStyle, SubtitleTextBlockStyle, BodyTextBlockStyle, CaptionTextBlockStyle) — no raw FontSize
  • Spacing uses 4px grid multiples (4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48)
  • Corner radius uses ControlCornerRadius / OverlayCornerRadius — not hardcoded values
  • Styles referenced with {StaticResource} not {ThemeResource} (except for brush usage sites)

Security

  • No secrets, API keys, or tokens in source code
  • No Process.Start with unsanitized user input
  • External input validated and sanitized before use
  • File paths from user input not used directly in File.Delete / File.WriteAllText without validation

Performance

  • Long or dynamic lists use ListView/GridView (virtualized), not StackPanel with foreach
  • x:Load for content that's not always visible (e.g., dialogs, secondary panels)
  • Heavy work off UI thread via Task.Run or async/await — never block UI
  • No .Result / .Wait() / .GetAwaiter().GetResult() — these deadlock the UI thread
  • using statements on all disposable objects (Model, Tokenizer, InferenceSession, Generator)

Globalization

  • User-facing strings use x:Uid in XAML and ResourceLoader in C# — not hardcoded
  • String resources in Strings/en-us/Resources.resw (not .resx)
  • Date/number formatting uses CultureInfo.CurrentCulture — not hardcoded formats
  • Layout supports RTL (FlowDirection inherited from root, no absolute positioning that breaks in RTL)
  • No string concatenation for user-facing messages — use string.Format or interpolation with resource strings

Review Report

After reviewing, summarize:

  1. Issues found: List each with file, line, and what's wrong
  2. Severity: Error (must fix), Warning (should fix), or Note (could improve)
  3. Suggested fixes: Specific code changes for each issue

References

For detailed rules with code examples, see references/quality-rules.md — covers performance deep dives (x:Phase, layout optimization), security (PasswordVault, DPAPI, WebView2 hardening), accessibility (keyboard nav, screen readers), code quality (.editorconfig, naming), and globalization (x:Uid patterns, RTL, pluralization).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.