agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/win-dev-skills/plugins/windbg/skills/windbg-kernel-bugcheck-triage/SKILL.md

windbg-kernel-bugcheck-triage

Skill469 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when a kernel dump reports a Windows bugcheck; decode parameters and recover exception or trap context before investigating your driver. Not for user-mode process crashes or blaming a module from its name alone.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Load windbg-diagnostic-method first: if it is not already loaded in this conversation, and apply it throughout for evidence ranking, …

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Use a kernel crash dump or authorized live kernel session.

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not reuse a parameter layout across different bugchecks.

    line 50
  4. Very specific:

    When !analyze -v or verified stack evidence identifies a TRAP_FRAME:

    line 75
  5. Distinctive:

    Verify vendor build identity against the matching binary/PDB.

    line 101
  6. Very specific:

    Follow FEEDBACK.md and submit only reviewed, sanitized feedback to WinDbg-Feedback.

    line 126

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Kernel Bugcheck Triage

Load windbg-diagnostic-method first if it is not already loaded in this conversation, and apply it throughout for evidence ranking, hypothesis testing, confidence calibration, independent review, and report validation. This skill adds the bug-family-specific commands and evidence requirements.

Scope

Use a kernel crash dump or authorized live kernel session. A process dump captured after a reboot does not contain the earlier kernel fault. Confirm the dump type with the debugger, not a filename or the user's visible symptom. This skill includes exception-context and trap-frame recovery.

Workflow

1. Establish symbols and bugcheck evidence

.symfix
.sympath+ <your-vendor-symbol-directory>
.reload
!analyze -v
.bugcheck
k

Replace the placeholder with the approved symbol location for your own binaries. Record dump type, target architecture/build, bugcheck code and parameters, faulting instruction, and available memory. Public Windows symbols suffice for many investigations; do not require private Windows source or PDBs.

2. Decode parameters for the specific code

CodeParameter meaning / next step
0x1EP1 exception code; P2 exception address; P3/P4 exception-specific information. These are not generically a CONTEXT pair.
0x7EP1 exception code; P2 exception address; P3 EXCEPTION_RECORD; P4 CONTEXT.
0x3BP1 exception code; P2 instruction address; P3 CONTEXT; P4 unused.
0x0A / 0xD1Referenced address, IRQL, access information, instruction address. Decode the access field for that code; these parameters are not generally a trap-frame pointer.
0x50Invalid memory reference; parameter interpretation varies with target version. Consult the code reference.
0x9FP1 selects the power-failure subtype; use its specific parameter table and windbg-kernel-irp-lifecycle-triage where applicable.
Verifier-class stopUse windbg-kernel-verifier-triage and the exact code/subcode definition.

Do not reuse a parameter layout across different bugchecks.

3. Recover the original faulting context

For 0x7E:

.exr <P3>
.cxr <P4>
kb
r

For 0x3B:

.cxr <P3>
kb
r

For other exception-style bugchecks, locate a valid saved exception/context using the documented code procedure and available analysis output. Do not guess .cxr arguments from arbitrary P1..P4 values.

When !analyze -v or verified stack evidence identifies a TRAP_FRAME:

.trap <trap-frame-address>
kb
r

Trap frames can be partial: some registers may be missing or reconstructed incorrectly. Note the debugger's warnings and do not treat unsaved registers as reliable evidence. If a frame is missing, malformed, or absent from the dump, report the limitation rather than scanning arbitrary pointers and claiming a recovered context.

4. Investigate the driver, not just the detector

!thread
lmvm <driver-module>
.frame /r <frame-number>

Inspect the recovered instruction, register/object used, IRQL, ownership, and nearby driver frames. A crash in an operating-system routine may result from prior driver corruption. Conversely, a third-party name in MODULE_NAME does not establish that the named driver caused the failure. Verify vendor build identity against the matching binary/PDB.

For concurrency or blocked requests use windbg-kernel-lock-deadlock-triage or windbg-kernel-irp-lifecycle-triage. Kernel ~ commands select processors, not the application thread list; use documented thread/process inspection such as !thread and !process 0 7.

Validation

Record the decoded parameters, recovered context and its limitations, and the evidence connecting the driver's operation to the violated invariant. Test competing lifetime, bounds, IRQL, and synchronization explanations. Recommend an instrumented test/repro only with approval; route Verifier evidence to windbg-kernel-verifier-triage. Do not call a guessed module assignment a proven cause.

References

Feedback

Follow FEEDBACK.md and submit only reviewed, sanitized feedback to WinDbg-Feedback. Include windbg-kernel-bugcheck-triage and the package version from plugin.json; no automatic kernel dump, private-symbol, or source upload.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.